In Feb and yes I have plenty of time. I have to give a Bible Reading. Some of the names in this reading are
Ke‧tu′rah,Zim′ran, Jok′shan,Me′dan, Mid′i‧an, Ish′bak and Shu′ah.
Jok′shan, She′ba, De′dan.
As‧shu′rim, Le‧tu′shim, Le‧um′mim.
Mid′i‧an, E′phah and E′pher and Ha′noch, A‧bi′da and El‧da′ah.
Ke‧tu′rah. Mach‧pe′lah E′phron, Zo′har Mam′re, Be′er-la′hai-roi.
Ish′ma‧el’s Ne‧ba′ioth and Ke′dar and Ad′be‧el and Mib′sam Mish′ma and Du′mah and Mas′sa,Ha′dad, Te′ma, Je′tur, Na′phish. Ked′e‧mah. Hav′i‧lah
You might ask what is a bible reading? Well every Tuesday we have what they call a school and service meeting. The school is where at least 4 people has parts which include bible reading, talk given on books of the bible, talk about stuff that happened during the week, bible reading.
I have the Bible the reading. This school is to make sure we understand what we are reading, what we are teaching, making sure we have a clear and accurate understanding of scripture. We go through all scriptures in the bible line by line verse by verse from the beginning of the bible to the end of it.
I do have to study because I remember having trouble with those names before. Anyways, everything is ok with my family. As you know we are having another baby. We are thinking of names now. For names I'm not sure just yet. My wife is 6 weeks and we are very excited.
Gabriel is something special. He always tells me what's going on. He's reading very well and it's amazing to see him on the computer going to his sites and playing his game.
Daisy - well she's very demanding and oh man you get in her bed and she will tell you " DAD go over there, that is your bed " She's very funny and if you make you way to her bed she will open your eye lid and tell you to go over there. LOL
Nevaeh well she's amazing. One of her first words is Hello. So when you walk in the room, she's like...Hello...Hello...and may not stop till you say hello. heheh
Jesse - He's doing well. As mentioned I have a video of him which is just about ready to put up. Right now he's out in service spreading the word. He really changed his life and really is putting God first. He does have hopes for the future, he does have dreams for the future. I hope they happen for him..
My wife and I are very happy and looking forward to our convention happening in Jan. Since I have no work tomorrow I will relax, you may not see another update till Friday when I will put the video up. Unless I get lazy and wait till Monday.
To folks far way...Be safe....
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Hmm
In life it's easy to point the finger at someone else for mistakes. It happens in the office, at school, and of course at home. Why do people do that? At times you could point the finger at someone else but most of the time you need to look in the mirror and take a good look at yourself.
Is it possible that I caused the chain of events? Is it possible that maybe I caused the domino effect? Is this new? Of course not. If you recall Eve's statement to God when she ate from the tree, she said it was the devil. She still had the choice. We all do. It's easy to pass blame to someone else. It's not easy to take blame for actions that happen.
Take for example this that I didn't understand then but I understand now. Bonded by Blood was a success. We were a strong guild pre-tbc. After the expansion hit we helped many obtain keys in order to raid Kara. Many that made it to 70 waited but we continued to help those get to 70 and obtain their keys. By doing so those who were waiting grew tired of waiting and thus left. I would say about 10 to 15 players in the course of 1 week. We were ok and marched on. Shortly after that maybe a few months raiding finally started. We had two groups going at the same time. There was some good that came from that and of course bad. If one group was doing better than the other, the guild as a whole would view the so called better group as the group to be in.
This even though we were all one guild and those who claimed they never got upset or felt as if there wasn't a competition are lying. I knew who said what, when they said it, and why they said it. I just let it go and tried to work through it and make it better. Because we were clearing 10-man we never really got 25-man raids going. Both teams that were in Kara should have merged and started 25-man teams and it did happen for a bit but did not continue. By then other members were raiding with other guilds and some of our so-called I would never leave guys left.
Like I said, I didn't understand then but I understand now. The only reason why the core left and why others left before the core was simply because leadership could not move the guild to the next level. Leadership included those in high rank in the guild but when it came down to it, it fell all on my shoulders and I indeed failed Bonded and it's members. It wasn't them and they had every right to leave. It was me and I accept that. I learned so much from it that now I can see clearly that you cannot blame any member for leaving your guild. You just can't. You have to look in the mirror and ask yourself. WHY and if you can look that deep and judge yourself and admit where you go wrong then the road to recovery isn't far away.
Could I have turned Bonded around? No there is no way because in order to see clearly you have to remove what's blocking your vision. You have to set all pride aside, all emotion, everything and then take a good look at yourself. Because I'm on the outside looking in, I can see clearly where I went wrong and how I could have improved. When people left Bonded I was upset at them. I did not point the finger at myself. I did not look in the mirror, I was pissed at them and could not see clearly why they left.
It's simple: People will leave if you
A. Are not advancing in raids
B. Leveling Alts instead of Raiding
C. Investing all in one tank, healer, dps instead of preparing all
D. Coming to Raids and forcing your way in even though you are not ready.
I can go on and on but example D is amazing because I went through that personally. Folks if you are not geared to go into an instance, DON'T GO INTO THE INSTANCE. There is a reason why there is requirements that you must meet. If it's a 10-man instance your part in it could cause wipes. Work on your gear and return when you are ready. If you are in a tanking position do not go in any raid unless you are prepared. If you force your way in because you have power in the guild then you are a newb and deserves to be removed from your position.
It's easy to whisper those who left your guild and call them bad words or whatever, what you need to do is look in the mirror and ask yourself, can I be the cause of it all?
And no to answer another question that was asked of me...I did not have anything to do with what's going on currently. It just so happens that I did not burn my bridges and I have spoken to many. I also made it a point to talk to those old Bonded members and apologize because I did not speak to them after they left. I don't and won't become a person who gets all upset because of a video game. It's a paying game so you have to understand that people will do whatever in order to move forward, they will do it with you or do it without you but should that be the reason why they should never speak to you again?
GROW UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is it possible that I caused the chain of events? Is it possible that maybe I caused the domino effect? Is this new? Of course not. If you recall Eve's statement to God when she ate from the tree, she said it was the devil. She still had the choice. We all do. It's easy to pass blame to someone else. It's not easy to take blame for actions that happen.
Take for example this that I didn't understand then but I understand now. Bonded by Blood was a success. We were a strong guild pre-tbc. After the expansion hit we helped many obtain keys in order to raid Kara. Many that made it to 70 waited but we continued to help those get to 70 and obtain their keys. By doing so those who were waiting grew tired of waiting and thus left. I would say about 10 to 15 players in the course of 1 week. We were ok and marched on. Shortly after that maybe a few months raiding finally started. We had two groups going at the same time. There was some good that came from that and of course bad. If one group was doing better than the other, the guild as a whole would view the so called better group as the group to be in.
This even though we were all one guild and those who claimed they never got upset or felt as if there wasn't a competition are lying. I knew who said what, when they said it, and why they said it. I just let it go and tried to work through it and make it better. Because we were clearing 10-man we never really got 25-man raids going. Both teams that were in Kara should have merged and started 25-man teams and it did happen for a bit but did not continue. By then other members were raiding with other guilds and some of our so-called I would never leave guys left.
Like I said, I didn't understand then but I understand now. The only reason why the core left and why others left before the core was simply because leadership could not move the guild to the next level. Leadership included those in high rank in the guild but when it came down to it, it fell all on my shoulders and I indeed failed Bonded and it's members. It wasn't them and they had every right to leave. It was me and I accept that. I learned so much from it that now I can see clearly that you cannot blame any member for leaving your guild. You just can't. You have to look in the mirror and ask yourself. WHY and if you can look that deep and judge yourself and admit where you go wrong then the road to recovery isn't far away.
Could I have turned Bonded around? No there is no way because in order to see clearly you have to remove what's blocking your vision. You have to set all pride aside, all emotion, everything and then take a good look at yourself. Because I'm on the outside looking in, I can see clearly where I went wrong and how I could have improved. When people left Bonded I was upset at them. I did not point the finger at myself. I did not look in the mirror, I was pissed at them and could not see clearly why they left.
It's simple: People will leave if you
A. Are not advancing in raids
B. Leveling Alts instead of Raiding
C. Investing all in one tank, healer, dps instead of preparing all
D. Coming to Raids and forcing your way in even though you are not ready.
I can go on and on but example D is amazing because I went through that personally. Folks if you are not geared to go into an instance, DON'T GO INTO THE INSTANCE. There is a reason why there is requirements that you must meet. If it's a 10-man instance your part in it could cause wipes. Work on your gear and return when you are ready. If you are in a tanking position do not go in any raid unless you are prepared. If you force your way in because you have power in the guild then you are a newb and deserves to be removed from your position.
It's easy to whisper those who left your guild and call them bad words or whatever, what you need to do is look in the mirror and ask yourself, can I be the cause of it all?
And no to answer another question that was asked of me...I did not have anything to do with what's going on currently. It just so happens that I did not burn my bridges and I have spoken to many. I also made it a point to talk to those old Bonded members and apologize because I did not speak to them after they left. I don't and won't become a person who gets all upset because of a video game. It's a paying game so you have to understand that people will do whatever in order to move forward, they will do it with you or do it without you but should that be the reason why they should never speak to you again?
GROW UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Monday, December 22, 2008
Interesting
Turn of events in game. I won't be specific but I want to say that if anyone is not respectful to people in game, people will leave. If people insist on having their way without listening to their members, people will leave. If you are not moving forward in terms of progression, people will leave.
As one mage recently told me - I see the writing on the wall. So what do you do now? Do you act like a jerk, act like you never knew him or her, act as if they never helped you or your alt gear up, act as if they never assisted you, act as if they never gave gold to the guild bank, act as if they didn't help recruit members, act as if they were never apart of what they helped create? One post I've read only because it was brought to my attention was " What kind of person are you "
Some really only act as your friends only as long as you remain with their Guild. I know this personally even though others may claim that's not the case. With some I made the first move and with others I remained silent. I will add my two cents on what I think can turn around a failing guild. I mentioned this before, I shall mention it again. Nobody in their right mind is paying $15.00 a month to sit in guild chat and chat. You have instant messenger for that. You have Xfire for that. I am not paying $15.00 a month to chat with you or anyone else when there are means to do it for free.
If leadership isn't cutting it, then you need to pass the lead to someone who will. At times it may require that you demote someone who is in power that should not be in power. Take for example - If over the years or months someone always points the finger elsewhere but yet others around him are leaving his guild then maybe you should look at the person causing it not those who left. Maybe you should look at those who are in power that shouldn't be.
Do I think Obama is a genius? No I don't but look at who he has around him. Look at who he selected to be in Power. You may not agree with all of them but you have to admit that he is indeed built a strong foundation. Like so a guild leader needs to have around him those who will make the right choices for the guild, those who are not selfish, those who will take the bull by the horns and move the guild forward. The Guild leader can lead and horse to water right? Can he make them drink? Thing is he doesn't have to they will drink but the leader or leader(s) need to take steps in order to progress the guild. First things first you only need one Guild Leader.
The Guild Leader doesn't have to know it all but he does need to be around those who do and those who will make things happen. If those around him cannot then he needs to demote them and if they leave his guild because of it then so be it. There are bigger things going on and the Guild Leader needs to think of the guild as a whole and who can he put in place that will help him move his guild forward. If the guild leader cannot do this, then he needs to pass it to the right person. Sadly, the person who I thought should have or could have has already gone bye bye because of the same issues I had way back when.
Now this isn't pointing my finger at anyone. This is giving advise. You can take it however you want to take it. Sounds a little ruff yes but so is loosing members left and right because you don't know what to do. I've been there and done that. I failed but because of my failure I was able to see the light. I was able to see clearly what I was doing wrong and how I should have and could have directed things to create a successful Guild. I have been in only three guilds. One I was a GM, the other I was an officer, and now I'm a member. Out of the three I can see there is organization in the one I'm currently in. There is direction in the one I'm currently in. There is progression in the one I'm currently in. There is respect for others in the one I'm currently in. It's like soup that has all the right stuff in it to make a good soup. If you don't have the right stuff the soup won't taste as good. Thus you won't have those coming into your restaurant or even staying in it. I hope you get the idea.
Soup needs to taste good and keep it cooking folks.
As one mage recently told me - I see the writing on the wall. So what do you do now? Do you act like a jerk, act like you never knew him or her, act as if they never helped you or your alt gear up, act as if they never assisted you, act as if they never gave gold to the guild bank, act as if they didn't help recruit members, act as if they were never apart of what they helped create? One post I've read only because it was brought to my attention was " What kind of person are you "
Some really only act as your friends only as long as you remain with their Guild. I know this personally even though others may claim that's not the case. With some I made the first move and with others I remained silent. I will add my two cents on what I think can turn around a failing guild. I mentioned this before, I shall mention it again. Nobody in their right mind is paying $15.00 a month to sit in guild chat and chat. You have instant messenger for that. You have Xfire for that. I am not paying $15.00 a month to chat with you or anyone else when there are means to do it for free.
If leadership isn't cutting it, then you need to pass the lead to someone who will. At times it may require that you demote someone who is in power that should not be in power. Take for example - If over the years or months someone always points the finger elsewhere but yet others around him are leaving his guild then maybe you should look at the person causing it not those who left. Maybe you should look at those who are in power that shouldn't be.
Do I think Obama is a genius? No I don't but look at who he has around him. Look at who he selected to be in Power. You may not agree with all of them but you have to admit that he is indeed built a strong foundation. Like so a guild leader needs to have around him those who will make the right choices for the guild, those who are not selfish, those who will take the bull by the horns and move the guild forward. The Guild leader can lead and horse to water right? Can he make them drink? Thing is he doesn't have to they will drink but the leader or leader(s) need to take steps in order to progress the guild. First things first you only need one Guild Leader.
The Guild Leader doesn't have to know it all but he does need to be around those who do and those who will make things happen. If those around him cannot then he needs to demote them and if they leave his guild because of it then so be it. There are bigger things going on and the Guild Leader needs to think of the guild as a whole and who can he put in place that will help him move his guild forward. If the guild leader cannot do this, then he needs to pass it to the right person. Sadly, the person who I thought should have or could have has already gone bye bye because of the same issues I had way back when.
Now this isn't pointing my finger at anyone. This is giving advise. You can take it however you want to take it. Sounds a little ruff yes but so is loosing members left and right because you don't know what to do. I've been there and done that. I failed but because of my failure I was able to see the light. I was able to see clearly what I was doing wrong and how I should have and could have directed things to create a successful Guild. I have been in only three guilds. One I was a GM, the other I was an officer, and now I'm a member. Out of the three I can see there is organization in the one I'm currently in. There is direction in the one I'm currently in. There is progression in the one I'm currently in. There is respect for others in the one I'm currently in. It's like soup that has all the right stuff in it to make a good soup. If you don't have the right stuff the soup won't taste as good. Thus you won't have those coming into your restaurant or even staying in it. I hope you get the idea.
Soup needs to taste good and keep it cooking folks.
Friday, December 19, 2008
Phew
Sorry for the delay. Yesterday was way to busy for me. Today started off like that but I'm ok now. My young one has an ear infection. He started crying at about 2am. He rested till about 4am. I ran to walgreens to get him some medicine.
Although it helped a bit we still took him to the Doctors. Anyways, I read this article the other day that talked about 9/11 and how April Gallop is suing Rumsfeld and Cheney. The reasons why and keep in mind that she was in the Pentagon when the so called plane hit, The suit alleges they engaged in conspiracy to facilitate the terrorist attacks and purposefully failed to warn those inside the Pentagon, contributing to injuries she and her two-month-old son incurred. Additional, unnamed persons with foreknowledge of the attacks are also named.
In the Pentagon they have daily drills just in case something is going to happen. That day, Sept 11th no drill. The Media often twisted her words but she stated on Record this " I was located at the E ring. From my inside perspective, with no knowledge of what had actually happened on the outside, it did sound like a bomb. And we had to escape the building before the floors, debris etc. collapsed on us.
"And I don't recall at anytime seeing any plane debris. Again, I don't know what plane debris would look like after hitting a building. But I would have recalled unusual looking pieces similar to plane parts."
So, to make a long story short. She is suing because she feels the Government knew the Pentagon was going to be attacked and they failed to Act. This is some of the report:
Interesting isn't it?
Although it helped a bit we still took him to the Doctors. Anyways, I read this article the other day that talked about 9/11 and how April Gallop is suing Rumsfeld and Cheney. The reasons why and keep in mind that she was in the Pentagon when the so called plane hit, The suit alleges they engaged in conspiracy to facilitate the terrorist attacks and purposefully failed to warn those inside the Pentagon, contributing to injuries she and her two-month-old son incurred. Additional, unnamed persons with foreknowledge of the attacks are also named.
In the Pentagon they have daily drills just in case something is going to happen. That day, Sept 11th no drill. The Media often twisted her words but she stated on Record this " I was located at the E ring. From my inside perspective, with no knowledge of what had actually happened on the outside, it did sound like a bomb. And we had to escape the building before the floors, debris etc. collapsed on us.
"And I don't recall at anytime seeing any plane debris. Again, I don't know what plane debris would look like after hitting a building. But I would have recalled unusual looking pieces similar to plane parts."
So, to make a long story short. She is suing because she feels the Government knew the Pentagon was going to be attacked and they failed to Act. This is some of the report:
Interesting isn't it?
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Scientists Call AP Report on Global Warming 'Hysteria'
It's really cold here in San Francisco. Where is this Global Warming? What's funny is that they are now saying the reason why it's so cold is because of Global Warming. Interesting isn't it.
The global temperature, at least as measured by satellite, is now the same as it was in the year 1980. In the last couple of years sea level has stopped rising. Hurricane and cyclone activity in the northern hemisphere is at a 24-year low and sea ice globally is also the same as it was in 1980.
No matter what is said from me or from those who are the experts in this field, they will continue to push Global Warming. Carbon Tax anyone? It's also interesting to note that here in San Francisco they want to charge you Tax for driving in specific areas! For example if you drive downtown, it will cost you 3 dollars which they will send through mail by taking a picture of your plates. If you leave the downtown area and come back later on in the day but still in the afternoon it will cost you another 3 dollars.
Other parts of the bay area will cost money, just not a much. It's possible that it will cost me money in order to drive to Work. Carbon Tax anyone!!! Folks it's time for you to open your eyes, do the research.
The global temperature, at least as measured by satellite, is now the same as it was in the year 1980. In the last couple of years sea level has stopped rising. Hurricane and cyclone activity in the northern hemisphere is at a 24-year low and sea ice globally is also the same as it was in 1980.
No matter what is said from me or from those who are the experts in this field, they will continue to push Global Warming. Carbon Tax anyone? It's also interesting to note that here in San Francisco they want to charge you Tax for driving in specific areas! For example if you drive downtown, it will cost you 3 dollars which they will send through mail by taking a picture of your plates. If you leave the downtown area and come back later on in the day but still in the afternoon it will cost you another 3 dollars.
Other parts of the bay area will cost money, just not a much. It's possible that it will cost me money in order to drive to Work. Carbon Tax anyone!!! Folks it's time for you to open your eyes, do the research.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Jonestown & Jesus
I walked home yesterday in the rain and the only thing on my mind was Jesus. I was thinking of the way he taught. I was thinking of what he has done and gone through for us. I was reflecting my choices in life. The reason I starting thinking of him was because an article I read about The Jonestown Massacre. Many younger ones may not recall just what happened. About 909 were led to their death by the Jim Jones in a mass murder-suicide pact in a South American jungle, shortly after Jones' gunmen killed a visiting U.S. congressman and four others at a nearby airstrip.
Of the nearly 1,000 church members who began the day in Jonestown, a cult commune, only 33 survived to see the next day. Jones was a phony faith healer, and much of his money came in mail-order donations from the desperate. Elderly members handed over their Social Security checks, working adults gave 25 percent of their wages to the church and some signed over all their property. Government investigators would later find at least $10 million in Swiss banks, mainly in Panama. Another $1 million in cash was recovered in Jonestown.
After thinking of Jones, I thought of Jesus. One side you have an evil person who clearly was in lead of a cult and another who is pure and holy. I thought that if Jesus were here today, where would he go? What would he say? And what would he do? If you recall back in the day Jesus has tried to show these religious leaders the consequences of their rejection of him. Remember what Jesus said? he said to them “You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father.” So Jesus concludes: “He that is from God listens to the sayings of God. This is why you do not listen, because you are not from God.”
He said this to those religious leaders back in his day. Would he say the same now? Would he approve of what is going on in the world today? Think about it for a second. If Jesus never taught hell fire would be approve of those teaching it? Would Jesus approve of those who use foul language and yet claim to love God? Would Jesus approve of Holidays that are of pagan origin? If Jesus was to inspect what is going on with every single religion in the world do you think he would be disappointed? He was disappointed then and he would be disappointed now. He would be disappointed by those who claim to love him and yet shoot his brother. He would be disappointed by those who claim to love him and yet would go to a strip club to watch another woman bare her fruits. He would be disappointed by those who claim to love him but yet is stealing, yet is killing, yet is using foul language, yet is punching his brother, yet is punching and kicking his sister causing her to have marks on her face, yet would be disappointed by teaching things he has never and would never teach, has never taught and would be upset at those who are teaching things that conflict with what is taught in the bible. It's clear Jesus would be disappointed.
Just because the worlds standards have lowered it does not mean that God's standards have lowered. It does not mean that God is going to allow his followers to do what Satan allows. God has high standards and yet his standards are not burdensome as mentioned in 1st John chapter 5 verse 3. It's not burdensome. It's us who makes it difficult on ourselves. It's us who fail God it's not the other way around. He has been and always will be there to give us guidance. He will always be there to give us direction, he will always show us the path in which we should walk. It's us who fail him.
It's easy to to blame God on the condition of the world but if you do not understand why it's the way it is then clearly you have not studied scripture. If you don't understand why we die, then you have not studied scripture, if you do not know who we should point our finger at then again you have not studied scripture. The scripture tells us that SATAN the devil is cause of the issues we see in the world today. God loves you but God loves those who he Disciplines does he not. And if you are truly listening to his word then you would listen to God's word and what it tells us. I mentioned Jesus and how he viewed the religious leaders of his day, Lets say if Jesus stood right in front of you and asked you how are you doing? He doesn't mean in health or whatever, he's asking in a spiritual sense how are you doing?
If you are doing things in life that he would not approve of do you think that he would be disappointed? If you say yes he would then change brother while there is still time to change. The scriptures tell us that we cannot slave for two masters. You cannot claim to serve God and yet your acts are what the Devil approves of. You cannot claim to serve God and yet treat your children as if they are dogs, as if your wife is a dog, as if your husband is a dog, as if your brother is a dog, as if your sister is a dog, as if your parents are dogs, You cannot claim to serve God if you are doing things in your life that God does not and would not and cannot approve of. Jonestown and what happened there did not need to happen but people often are lead down a path they do not question.
Before I became who I am today, I questioned everything because what I was taught as a boy conflicted with what I was learning as a man. My eyes were opened as since I received accurate knowledge I wondered what was preventing those from hearing and opening their own eyes. 2nd Corinthians chapter 4 verse 4 is clear when it states that Satan has blinded minds and that the good news about the Christ might not shine through. You cannot slave for two masters....If Jesus did indeed make a surprise inspection today, what would you say to him? And are you living up to God's standards or living up to the worlds standard whose really doesn't have any standards. Till tomorrow....
Of the nearly 1,000 church members who began the day in Jonestown, a cult commune, only 33 survived to see the next day. Jones was a phony faith healer, and much of his money came in mail-order donations from the desperate. Elderly members handed over their Social Security checks, working adults gave 25 percent of their wages to the church and some signed over all their property. Government investigators would later find at least $10 million in Swiss banks, mainly in Panama. Another $1 million in cash was recovered in Jonestown.
After thinking of Jones, I thought of Jesus. One side you have an evil person who clearly was in lead of a cult and another who is pure and holy. I thought that if Jesus were here today, where would he go? What would he say? And what would he do? If you recall back in the day Jesus has tried to show these religious leaders the consequences of their rejection of him. Remember what Jesus said? he said to them “You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father.” So Jesus concludes: “He that is from God listens to the sayings of God. This is why you do not listen, because you are not from God.”
He said this to those religious leaders back in his day. Would he say the same now? Would he approve of what is going on in the world today? Think about it for a second. If Jesus never taught hell fire would be approve of those teaching it? Would Jesus approve of those who use foul language and yet claim to love God? Would Jesus approve of Holidays that are of pagan origin? If Jesus was to inspect what is going on with every single religion in the world do you think he would be disappointed? He was disappointed then and he would be disappointed now. He would be disappointed by those who claim to love him and yet shoot his brother. He would be disappointed by those who claim to love him and yet would go to a strip club to watch another woman bare her fruits. He would be disappointed by those who claim to love him but yet is stealing, yet is killing, yet is using foul language, yet is punching his brother, yet is punching and kicking his sister causing her to have marks on her face, yet would be disappointed by teaching things he has never and would never teach, has never taught and would be upset at those who are teaching things that conflict with what is taught in the bible. It's clear Jesus would be disappointed.
Just because the worlds standards have lowered it does not mean that God's standards have lowered. It does not mean that God is going to allow his followers to do what Satan allows. God has high standards and yet his standards are not burdensome as mentioned in 1st John chapter 5 verse 3. It's not burdensome. It's us who makes it difficult on ourselves. It's us who fail God it's not the other way around. He has been and always will be there to give us guidance. He will always be there to give us direction, he will always show us the path in which we should walk. It's us who fail him.
It's easy to to blame God on the condition of the world but if you do not understand why it's the way it is then clearly you have not studied scripture. If you don't understand why we die, then you have not studied scripture, if you do not know who we should point our finger at then again you have not studied scripture. The scripture tells us that SATAN the devil is cause of the issues we see in the world today. God loves you but God loves those who he Disciplines does he not. And if you are truly listening to his word then you would listen to God's word and what it tells us. I mentioned Jesus and how he viewed the religious leaders of his day, Lets say if Jesus stood right in front of you and asked you how are you doing? He doesn't mean in health or whatever, he's asking in a spiritual sense how are you doing?
If you are doing things in life that he would not approve of do you think that he would be disappointed? If you say yes he would then change brother while there is still time to change. The scriptures tell us that we cannot slave for two masters. You cannot claim to serve God and yet your acts are what the Devil approves of. You cannot claim to serve God and yet treat your children as if they are dogs, as if your wife is a dog, as if your husband is a dog, as if your brother is a dog, as if your sister is a dog, as if your parents are dogs, You cannot claim to serve God if you are doing things in your life that God does not and would not and cannot approve of. Jonestown and what happened there did not need to happen but people often are lead down a path they do not question.
Before I became who I am today, I questioned everything because what I was taught as a boy conflicted with what I was learning as a man. My eyes were opened as since I received accurate knowledge I wondered what was preventing those from hearing and opening their own eyes. 2nd Corinthians chapter 4 verse 4 is clear when it states that Satan has blinded minds and that the good news about the Christ might not shine through. You cannot slave for two masters....If Jesus did indeed make a surprise inspection today, what would you say to him? And are you living up to God's standards or living up to the worlds standard whose really doesn't have any standards. Till tomorrow....
Monday, December 15, 2008
The Basic.
What kind of person am I?
I read this post that talked about me without directly saying it. It's interesting to note that everything that I have said after leaving the guild and game has come to pass but even before while I was still apart of that guild, I was warned by Vato.
I was blind and could not see. Sadly others who are still apart of that mess cannot see as well and it's to bad because sooner or later they will wake up. I mentioned what it took to be a success. I have learned from my mistakes and while it is a team effort, the guild does not move forward unless leadership is moving forward.
It takes someone who is doing something in order to move an entire guild forward. I also mentioned that unless you are progressing you will lose members. I mentioned that unless you are being respectful you will lose members.
The last few days I have spoken to many and to those who did not allow a game to come between friendship I thank you. Some folks I know and wish I never did know cannot understand the difference. They cannot separate the game and friendship.
It's interesting also that Blmp who has been a good friend over the years continues to be a good friend simply because he is mature enough to understand the difference between a game and friendship. I have spoken to many that left Bonded. I understand the difference. Should I get upset at you because you want to better yourself. You would have stayed with Bonded if I provided progression.
The saying I will never leave I love it here was simply a lie. Think of it in terms of football. If a player leaves the team to sign with another, do you think those from his former team never speak to him again? Do you think that his former coaches never speak to him again? Of course they do and isn't football a game as well?
There are childish folks in this world who have yet to grow up. There are those who cannot think for themselves and there are those who SHOULD be in charge ( a shaman I know ) but isn't. He's a healer by the way.
What makes a good leader? Well someone who thinks of others before himself. Someone who will enforce his own rules. Someone who respects all his members and tries to include them. Someone who puts those in power that deserves it and is active in their role. Someone who recruits what is needed instead of inviting everyone and their mothers. Someone who will push their goals and respect the ideas of others in terms of progression. Someone who will step down if they aren't cutting it.
It was also mentioned about myself that I have the " it's all about me " which is far from the truth and instead of listening to this person who doesn't have a clue, listen to those who recently left and you can see that my view isn't so one sided as he may think. At least I can look in the mirror and judge myself and correct myself and I can admit when I'm wrong and correct mistakes that I've made. I have yet to see him do any of that. I have been thinking of others but like in football it was time to change teams simply because we were never going to win a superbowl.
In my view it's not the players it's the coaches that need to be replaced. Sadly this person is more like Al Davis who wants to be in control of everything even though he doesn't have any clue. He failed back then and will fail again. Some people just aren't made to lead or be in a position of power. In my view that spot should be and should have always been a healer that I know, a shaman healer.
Speaking of which I had the honor of speaking to him and even though I know he felt upset at me, he is a very humble and open to reason instead of closed to conversation. I used to get upset when people left the guild. It took him doing it to me in order for me to understand my mistake and really does he really have a legit reason to be upset at me? No because if you recall I was getting stressed out. I didn't leave the guild, I quit the game. I didn't join another guild I quit the game. I was waking up nights, having trouble sleep. I had to quit because of what it was doing to me on a personal level but does he understand that? NO of course not
So I create this blog to give my thoughts on various issues but in the beginning I talk about my father who died. What does he do? He gets on the Wow Forums and bashes my blog while I'm talking about my dead father. He hid himself behind an Alt called MeeSoo. He thought I didn't remember that it was him even though he himself told me years ago when he was bashing Ezdagor. I'm talking about my dead father and he talks crap about my blog. In the beginning I asked what kind of person am I? I should ask what kind of person is he?
All I have to say is that I wish I never knew him and sad over the fact that others who are with him are blinded even though people from his own guild agree with most of what I'm saying.
I read this post that talked about me without directly saying it. It's interesting to note that everything that I have said after leaving the guild and game has come to pass but even before while I was still apart of that guild, I was warned by Vato.
I was blind and could not see. Sadly others who are still apart of that mess cannot see as well and it's to bad because sooner or later they will wake up. I mentioned what it took to be a success. I have learned from my mistakes and while it is a team effort, the guild does not move forward unless leadership is moving forward.
It takes someone who is doing something in order to move an entire guild forward. I also mentioned that unless you are progressing you will lose members. I mentioned that unless you are being respectful you will lose members.
The last few days I have spoken to many and to those who did not allow a game to come between friendship I thank you. Some folks I know and wish I never did know cannot understand the difference. They cannot separate the game and friendship.
It's interesting also that Blmp who has been a good friend over the years continues to be a good friend simply because he is mature enough to understand the difference between a game and friendship. I have spoken to many that left Bonded. I understand the difference. Should I get upset at you because you want to better yourself. You would have stayed with Bonded if I provided progression.
The saying I will never leave I love it here was simply a lie. Think of it in terms of football. If a player leaves the team to sign with another, do you think those from his former team never speak to him again? Do you think that his former coaches never speak to him again? Of course they do and isn't football a game as well?
There are childish folks in this world who have yet to grow up. There are those who cannot think for themselves and there are those who SHOULD be in charge ( a shaman I know ) but isn't. He's a healer by the way.
What makes a good leader? Well someone who thinks of others before himself. Someone who will enforce his own rules. Someone who respects all his members and tries to include them. Someone who puts those in power that deserves it and is active in their role. Someone who recruits what is needed instead of inviting everyone and their mothers. Someone who will push their goals and respect the ideas of others in terms of progression. Someone who will step down if they aren't cutting it.
It was also mentioned about myself that I have the " it's all about me " which is far from the truth and instead of listening to this person who doesn't have a clue, listen to those who recently left and you can see that my view isn't so one sided as he may think. At least I can look in the mirror and judge myself and correct myself and I can admit when I'm wrong and correct mistakes that I've made. I have yet to see him do any of that. I have been thinking of others but like in football it was time to change teams simply because we were never going to win a superbowl.
In my view it's not the players it's the coaches that need to be replaced. Sadly this person is more like Al Davis who wants to be in control of everything even though he doesn't have any clue. He failed back then and will fail again. Some people just aren't made to lead or be in a position of power. In my view that spot should be and should have always been a healer that I know, a shaman healer.
Speaking of which I had the honor of speaking to him and even though I know he felt upset at me, he is a very humble and open to reason instead of closed to conversation. I used to get upset when people left the guild. It took him doing it to me in order for me to understand my mistake and really does he really have a legit reason to be upset at me? No because if you recall I was getting stressed out. I didn't leave the guild, I quit the game. I didn't join another guild I quit the game. I was waking up nights, having trouble sleep. I had to quit because of what it was doing to me on a personal level but does he understand that? NO of course not
So I create this blog to give my thoughts on various issues but in the beginning I talk about my father who died. What does he do? He gets on the Wow Forums and bashes my blog while I'm talking about my dead father. He hid himself behind an Alt called MeeSoo. He thought I didn't remember that it was him even though he himself told me years ago when he was bashing Ezdagor. I'm talking about my dead father and he talks crap about my blog. In the beginning I asked what kind of person am I? I should ask what kind of person is he?
All I have to say is that I wish I never knew him and sad over the fact that others who are with him are blinded even though people from his own guild agree with most of what I'm saying.
Friday, December 12, 2008
ANXIETY
Each day that I watch the news or read about the news it's always something negative. Yesterday I read that 35000 people will lose their jobs from Bank of America. I read that 1500 lost their jobs the day before yesterday. Anxiety is characterized by extreme uneasiness of mind or brooding fear about some contingency, full of mental distress or uneasiness because of fear of danger or misfortune; greatly worried.
Don't you agree that we have much to be Anxious about today? Anxiety can be damaging to one’s well-being. It can lead to depression, robbing one of strength and the initiative to act. Says the inspired Proverb chapter 12 verse 25: “Anxious care in the heart of a man is what will cause it to bow down.” There can be serious physical manifestations from worry.
Each time I think of the economy and my role in it I worry. I worry that someday I won't have a job. I worry that I won't be able to take care of my kids. I worry about my friends, my brothers, my loved ones. I worry about them. I worry about those that are here and those that are not here.
Then I think of what Jesus said in the book of Matthew chapter 6 verse 25 through 32 where we read and I quote "
On this account I say to you: Stop being anxious about YOUR souls as to what YOU will eat or what YOU will drink, or about YOUR bodies as to what YOU will wear. Does not the soul mean more than food and the body than clothing? Observe intently the birds of heaven, because they do not sow seed or reap or gather into storehouses; still YOUR heavenly Father feeds them. Are YOU not worth more than they are? Who of YOU by being anxious can add one cubit to his life span? Also, on the matter of clothing, why are YOU anxious? Take a lesson from the lilies of the field, how they are growing; they do not toil, nor do they spin; but I say to YOU that not even Sol′omon in all his glory was arrayed as one of these. If, now, God thus clothes the vegetation of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much rather clothe YOU, YOU with little faith? So never be anxious and say, ‘What are we to eat?’ or, ‘What are we to drink?’ or, ‘What are we to put on?’ For all these are the things the nations are eagerly pursuing. For YOUR heavenly Father knows YOU need all these things" End quote
Jesus concludes this part of his discourse with two pieces of advice. The first: “Keep on, then, seeking first God’s kingdom and his righteousness, and all these other things will be added to you.” The second: “So, never be anxious about the next day, for the next day will have its own anxieties. Sufficient for each day is its own badness.” as found at Matthew 6:33, 34.
Do you think that Jesus was discouraging his disciples, including farmers, from ‘sowing, reaping, or gathering their crops into storehouses’? Or from ‘toiling and spinning’ to get the clothes they needed? Surely not. If they stopped working, they would almost inevitably end up “begging in reaping time,” with nothing to eat or to wear.
Did Jesus mean that anyone could escape anxiety completely? That would be unrealistic. Jesus himself experienced deep emotional distress and anxiety on the night that he was arrested.
Jesus was simply stating a fundamental truth. Undue anxiety will never help you to solve whatever problems you face. It will not, for example, help you to live longer. It will not add one cubit to your life span,.Intense, prolonged anxiety is, in fact, more likely to shorten your life.
His advice was eminently practical. Many of the things we worry about never happen anyway and then we realize that we were worried for nothing. Jesus had much more in mind than his listeners’ physical and emotional well-being. He knew that anxiety about getting the necessities of life, as well as a consuming desire for possessions and pleasures, can crowd out the more important things. What could be more important than getting the necessities of life?’ you may think. The answer is spiritual things having to do with our worship of God. The prime thing in our lives, Jesus stressed, should be to keep on seeking first God’s kingdom and his righteousness.
In Jesus’ day, many people were eagerly pursuing material things. Amassing wealth was their foremost priority. Jesus, however, urged his listeners to have a different outlook. As people dedicated to God, their “whole obligation” was to “fear the true God and keep his commandments.” The same applies to us today.
Back then - Preoccupation with material things—the anxiety of this system of things and the deceptive power of riches—could have destroyed his listeners spiritually. Those who are determined to be rich, fall into temptation and a snare and many senseless and hurtful desires, which plunge men into destruction and ruin.
To help them avoid this “snare,” Jesus reminded his followers that their heavenly Father knew they needed all these things. God would provide for them just as he provides for “the birds of heaven.” Instead of allowing anxiety to overwhelm them, they were to do all they could to care for matters and then confidently leave things in Jehovah’s hands.
When Jesus said “tomorrow will look after itself,” he simply meant that we should not allow undue anxiety about what might happen tomorrow add to our problems today. There is a big difference, however, between not worrying unduly about tomorrow and ignoring it completely. Jesus never encouraged his disciples to ignore tomorrow. On the contrary, he urged them to be intensely interested in the future. They should rightly pray for present needs—their daily bread. But first they should pray for things that were yet future—for God’s Kingdom to come and God’s will to be done on earth.
We should not be like the people of Noah’s day. They were so busy “eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in marriage” that they “took no note” of what was about to happen. With what consequence? “The flood came and swept them all away.” The apostle Peter used that historical event to remind us of the need to live with tomorrow in view. “Since all these things are thus to be dissolved,” he wrote, “what sort of persons ought you to be in holy acts of conduct and deeds of godly devotion, awaiting and keeping close in mind the presence of the day of Jehovah!” as mentioned in 2nd Peter chapter 3 verse 5-7, 11, 12.
So what is a person to do? First, do not make a mistake like that of the man whom Jesus described. Find out what God has in store for tomorrow, and build your life around that. God has not left humans in the dark about what he will do.
What will happen in our future will affect the whole earth on an unprecedented scale. Jesus said: “There will be great tribulation such as has not occurred since the world’s beginning until now.” No human can avert that event. Indeed, there is no reason why worshippers would want to avert it. Why? Because this event will rid the earth of all evil, and it will usher in “a new heaven and a new earth,” meaning a new heavenly government and a new earthly society. In that new world, God “will wipe out every tear from people’s eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore as mentioned in Revelation chapter 21 verse 1-4.
While it's ok to worry, don't allow it to rule your life. Keep putting the kingdom first. I do have a special video that I will post that will include Jesse On stage. I hope to have this complete by Monday. Have a great weekend.
Don't you agree that we have much to be Anxious about today? Anxiety can be damaging to one’s well-being. It can lead to depression, robbing one of strength and the initiative to act. Says the inspired Proverb chapter 12 verse 25: “Anxious care in the heart of a man is what will cause it to bow down.” There can be serious physical manifestations from worry.
Each time I think of the economy and my role in it I worry. I worry that someday I won't have a job. I worry that I won't be able to take care of my kids. I worry about my friends, my brothers, my loved ones. I worry about them. I worry about those that are here and those that are not here.
Then I think of what Jesus said in the book of Matthew chapter 6 verse 25 through 32 where we read and I quote "
On this account I say to you: Stop being anxious about YOUR souls as to what YOU will eat or what YOU will drink, or about YOUR bodies as to what YOU will wear. Does not the soul mean more than food and the body than clothing? Observe intently the birds of heaven, because they do not sow seed or reap or gather into storehouses; still YOUR heavenly Father feeds them. Are YOU not worth more than they are? Who of YOU by being anxious can add one cubit to his life span? Also, on the matter of clothing, why are YOU anxious? Take a lesson from the lilies of the field, how they are growing; they do not toil, nor do they spin; but I say to YOU that not even Sol′omon in all his glory was arrayed as one of these. If, now, God thus clothes the vegetation of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much rather clothe YOU, YOU with little faith? So never be anxious and say, ‘What are we to eat?’ or, ‘What are we to drink?’ or, ‘What are we to put on?’ For all these are the things the nations are eagerly pursuing. For YOUR heavenly Father knows YOU need all these things" End quote
Jesus concludes this part of his discourse with two pieces of advice. The first: “Keep on, then, seeking first God’s kingdom and his righteousness, and all these other things will be added to you.” The second: “So, never be anxious about the next day, for the next day will have its own anxieties. Sufficient for each day is its own badness.” as found at Matthew 6:33, 34.
Do you think that Jesus was discouraging his disciples, including farmers, from ‘sowing, reaping, or gathering their crops into storehouses’? Or from ‘toiling and spinning’ to get the clothes they needed? Surely not. If they stopped working, they would almost inevitably end up “begging in reaping time,” with nothing to eat or to wear.
Did Jesus mean that anyone could escape anxiety completely? That would be unrealistic. Jesus himself experienced deep emotional distress and anxiety on the night that he was arrested.
Jesus was simply stating a fundamental truth. Undue anxiety will never help you to solve whatever problems you face. It will not, for example, help you to live longer. It will not add one cubit to your life span,.Intense, prolonged anxiety is, in fact, more likely to shorten your life.
His advice was eminently practical. Many of the things we worry about never happen anyway and then we realize that we were worried for nothing. Jesus had much more in mind than his listeners’ physical and emotional well-being. He knew that anxiety about getting the necessities of life, as well as a consuming desire for possessions and pleasures, can crowd out the more important things. What could be more important than getting the necessities of life?’ you may think. The answer is spiritual things having to do with our worship of God. The prime thing in our lives, Jesus stressed, should be to keep on seeking first God’s kingdom and his righteousness.
In Jesus’ day, many people were eagerly pursuing material things. Amassing wealth was their foremost priority. Jesus, however, urged his listeners to have a different outlook. As people dedicated to God, their “whole obligation” was to “fear the true God and keep his commandments.” The same applies to us today.
Back then - Preoccupation with material things—the anxiety of this system of things and the deceptive power of riches—could have destroyed his listeners spiritually. Those who are determined to be rich, fall into temptation and a snare and many senseless and hurtful desires, which plunge men into destruction and ruin.
To help them avoid this “snare,” Jesus reminded his followers that their heavenly Father knew they needed all these things. God would provide for them just as he provides for “the birds of heaven.” Instead of allowing anxiety to overwhelm them, they were to do all they could to care for matters and then confidently leave things in Jehovah’s hands.
When Jesus said “tomorrow will look after itself,” he simply meant that we should not allow undue anxiety about what might happen tomorrow add to our problems today. There is a big difference, however, between not worrying unduly about tomorrow and ignoring it completely. Jesus never encouraged his disciples to ignore tomorrow. On the contrary, he urged them to be intensely interested in the future. They should rightly pray for present needs—their daily bread. But first they should pray for things that were yet future—for God’s Kingdom to come and God’s will to be done on earth.
We should not be like the people of Noah’s day. They were so busy “eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in marriage” that they “took no note” of what was about to happen. With what consequence? “The flood came and swept them all away.” The apostle Peter used that historical event to remind us of the need to live with tomorrow in view. “Since all these things are thus to be dissolved,” he wrote, “what sort of persons ought you to be in holy acts of conduct and deeds of godly devotion, awaiting and keeping close in mind the presence of the day of Jehovah!” as mentioned in 2nd Peter chapter 3 verse 5-7, 11, 12.
So what is a person to do? First, do not make a mistake like that of the man whom Jesus described. Find out what God has in store for tomorrow, and build your life around that. God has not left humans in the dark about what he will do.
What will happen in our future will affect the whole earth on an unprecedented scale. Jesus said: “There will be great tribulation such as has not occurred since the world’s beginning until now.” No human can avert that event. Indeed, there is no reason why worshippers would want to avert it. Why? Because this event will rid the earth of all evil, and it will usher in “a new heaven and a new earth,” meaning a new heavenly government and a new earthly society. In that new world, God “will wipe out every tear from people’s eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore as mentioned in Revelation chapter 21 verse 1-4.
While it's ok to worry, don't allow it to rule your life. Keep putting the kingdom first. I do have a special video that I will post that will include Jesse On stage. I hope to have this complete by Monday. Have a great weekend.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
9/11 Truth
I have mentioned many times how I feel about 9/11. I posted information on why I know it was indeed an inside job but I don't recall posting how others feel. Here is Rosie with Mr.Rodriguez.
You might reason and say what do they know? Well, Head of the ISI
Ex-Italian President stated that 9/11 Inside Job. The Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.
Cossiga was elected President of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide 1985 election to become President of the country in 1985.Cossiga gained respect from opposition parties as one of a rare breed - an honest politician - and led the country for seven years until April 1992.
Cossiga's tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 60's, 70's and 80's.
Gladio's specialty was to carry out what they coined "false flag operations," terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition.Cossiga's revelations contributed to an Italian parliamentary investigation of Gladio in 2000, during which evidence was unearthed that the attacks were being overseen by the U.S. intelligence apparatus.
In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."
Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9/11 in 2001, and is quoted in Webster Tarpley's book as stating that "The mastermind of the attack must have been a "sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel.
I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel."Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga's assertion that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies is highly unlikely to be mentioned by any establishment media outlets, because like the hundreds of other sober ex-government, military, air force professionals, allied to hundreds more professors and intellectuals - he can't be sidelined as a crackpot conspiracy theorist.
Charlie Sheen:
Mark Ruffalo:
The list really can go on and on from Celebrities, Those in Government, Those Around the World. When will you at least consider the fact that it indeed was an inside job.
Most think JFK was an inside job, why is it so hard to believe that 9/11 was? It's already been proven that false flag operations have happened in the past. Open your eyes folks.....Look out for the next 4 years.
You might reason and say what do they know? Well, Head of the ISI
Ex-Italian President stated that 9/11 Inside Job. The Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.
Cossiga was elected President of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide 1985 election to become President of the country in 1985.Cossiga gained respect from opposition parties as one of a rare breed - an honest politician - and led the country for seven years until April 1992.
Cossiga's tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 60's, 70's and 80's.
Gladio's specialty was to carry out what they coined "false flag operations," terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition.Cossiga's revelations contributed to an Italian parliamentary investigation of Gladio in 2000, during which evidence was unearthed that the attacks were being overseen by the U.S. intelligence apparatus.
In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."
Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9/11 in 2001, and is quoted in Webster Tarpley's book as stating that "The mastermind of the attack must have been a "sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel.
I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel."Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga's assertion that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies is highly unlikely to be mentioned by any establishment media outlets, because like the hundreds of other sober ex-government, military, air force professionals, allied to hundreds more professors and intellectuals - he can't be sidelined as a crackpot conspiracy theorist.
Charlie Sheen:
Mark Ruffalo:
The list really can go on and on from Celebrities, Those in Government, Those Around the World. When will you at least consider the fact that it indeed was an inside job.
Most think JFK was an inside job, why is it so hard to believe that 9/11 was? It's already been proven that false flag operations have happened in the past. Open your eyes folks.....Look out for the next 4 years.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
It's Cold not Hot
Over 650 scientists have put their names to a US Senate Minority report that challenges the contention of the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change that there is a scientific “consensus” on the causes of global warming.
Set to be released within the next 24 hours, the report features contributions from hundreds of prominent researchers, including current and former IPCC scientists, who are now speaking out in opposition of the UN’s stance on climate change.
The Senate report is an updated version of a 2007 release, with over 250 more names added, highlighting how widespread dissent continues to grow in the scientific community to the alleged “consensus” that the modern warming is primarily man-made and is a crisis.
In comparison, twelve times fewer - just 52 scientists - participated in the much touted IPCC Summary for Policymakers meeting in April 2007. Climate scientists allied with the IPCC were recently caught citing fake data to make the case that global warming is accelerating.
The new Senate report will feature new peer-reviewed scientific studies and analyses refuting man-made warming fears.
Of course the fact that the establishment likes to engage in regular mass public deception by claiming the debate about global warming is over and any dissent is tantamount to holocaust denial doesn’t bode well for potential media coverage of the report, unlike the ongoing UN climate conference in Poznan which is being lavished with endless media attention about the need for a global carbon tax to save the planet from the evils of plant food (CO2).
The self-proclaimed “consensus” behind man-made global warming is one enforced by threats, intimidation and ignorance, as highlighted by media coverage of last year’s UN meeting in Bali, where skeptical climate scientists were shunned and ignored for daring to express an opposing viewpoint.
Following the Bali resolution to impose a global carbon tax, over one hundred prominent scientists signed a letter dismissing the move as a futile bureaucratic scheme which would diminish prosperity and increase human suffering.
Hundreds more skeptical scientists met in Manhattan last February at the first International Conference on Climate Change to discuss the side of the climate change debate that the establishment media prefers to pretend does not exist.
Did the mainstream media even acknowledge these events? Not at all, because they challenge the sacred cow that scientists uniformly agree on man-made global warming.
As we have previously reported, less than half of all published scientists endorse what has been dubbed the “consensus view”.
However, President-elect Barack Obama yesterday vowed to end global warming “denial”.
The following quotes, listed on the website of the US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, provide a taster of what will be contained in the upcoming Senate report:
“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.
“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”
Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.
“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC “are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico
“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.
“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.
“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri’s asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it’s hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society’s Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.
“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?” - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.
“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.
“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.
“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.
“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.
“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata.
Interesting isn't it. They say jump, you say ?
Set to be released within the next 24 hours, the report features contributions from hundreds of prominent researchers, including current and former IPCC scientists, who are now speaking out in opposition of the UN’s stance on climate change.
The Senate report is an updated version of a 2007 release, with over 250 more names added, highlighting how widespread dissent continues to grow in the scientific community to the alleged “consensus” that the modern warming is primarily man-made and is a crisis.
In comparison, twelve times fewer - just 52 scientists - participated in the much touted IPCC Summary for Policymakers meeting in April 2007. Climate scientists allied with the IPCC were recently caught citing fake data to make the case that global warming is accelerating.
The new Senate report will feature new peer-reviewed scientific studies and analyses refuting man-made warming fears.
Of course the fact that the establishment likes to engage in regular mass public deception by claiming the debate about global warming is over and any dissent is tantamount to holocaust denial doesn’t bode well for potential media coverage of the report, unlike the ongoing UN climate conference in Poznan which is being lavished with endless media attention about the need for a global carbon tax to save the planet from the evils of plant food (CO2).
The self-proclaimed “consensus” behind man-made global warming is one enforced by threats, intimidation and ignorance, as highlighted by media coverage of last year’s UN meeting in Bali, where skeptical climate scientists were shunned and ignored for daring to express an opposing viewpoint.
Following the Bali resolution to impose a global carbon tax, over one hundred prominent scientists signed a letter dismissing the move as a futile bureaucratic scheme which would diminish prosperity and increase human suffering.
Hundreds more skeptical scientists met in Manhattan last February at the first International Conference on Climate Change to discuss the side of the climate change debate that the establishment media prefers to pretend does not exist.
Did the mainstream media even acknowledge these events? Not at all, because they challenge the sacred cow that scientists uniformly agree on man-made global warming.
As we have previously reported, less than half of all published scientists endorse what has been dubbed the “consensus view”.
However, President-elect Barack Obama yesterday vowed to end global warming “denial”.
The following quotes, listed on the website of the US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, provide a taster of what will be contained in the upcoming Senate report:
“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.
“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”
Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.
“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC “are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico
“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.
“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.
“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri’s asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it’s hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society’s Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.
“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?” - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.
“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.
“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.
“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.
“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.
“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata.
Interesting isn't it. They say jump, you say ?
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
World
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7a03e5b6-c541-11dd-b516-000077b07658.html
After you have read the article from a well respected source, please consider the fact that FEAR drives most to allow governments to accomplish the goal of a one world government.
Many still do not or should I say have not opened their eyes to what is coming. Most will call it one sided. He only posts one sided information. Is it really one sided? Take a newspaper and read what is typed. Can you respond to the newspaper? No you cannot but you have the choice to disagree with what's being said. I've said many things and quoted many.
The US government does not have a monopoly on hypocrisy, but no other government can match the hypocrisy of the US government.
It is now well documented and known all over the world that the US government tortured detainees at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and that the US government has had people kidnaped and “rendentioned,” that is, transported to third-world countries, such as Egypt, to be tortured.
Also documented and well known is the fact that the US Department of Justice provided written memos justifying the torture of detainees. One torture advocate who wrote the DOJ memos that gave the green light to the Bush regime’s use of torture is John Yoo, a Vietnamese immigrant who somehow secured a US Justice Department appointment and a tenured professorship at the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law.
Members of Berkeley’s city council believe that Yoo should be charged with war crimes. The US government has charged lesser offenders than Yoo with war crimes. Yoo helped the DOJ achieve the Bush regime’s goal of finding a way around the torture prohibitions of both US statutory law and the Geneva Conventions.
The way around the law that Yoo provided for the sadistic Bush regime was closed down by the US Supreme Court, which voided Yoo’s arguments, and Yoo’s torture memo was rescinded by the Department of Justice. Nevertheless, Yoo’s obvious constitutional incompetence, which in Yoo’s case is total, has not affected his position as professor of constitutional law at Berkeley. Can you imagine the harm Yoo is doing by teaching future cadres of lawyers and government officials that torture is consistent with the Constitution and the law of the land? How many of us will suffer from this ignorant man’s teachings?
But I digress. Even as the US government was torturing people, the US government was prosecuting the son of Charles Taylor, the former ruler of Liberia, for torturing political opponents of his father’s government. The US government did not employ the Yoo torture memo to justify Liberia’s use of torture against those who wished to overthrow the Liberian government or commit terror against it. The US government’s position is that Liberia’s government had no right to use torture to defend itself. Only an “indispensable nation” such as the US has the right to torture people who are imagined to threaten it.
I use the word “imagined” because approximately 99 percent of the detainees tortured by America were totally innocent people picked up at random or sold to the stupid Americans by warlords as “terrorists.” (The US government offered rewards for terrorists, like the bounty offered for outlaws in the “wild west.” The result was that warlords in Afghanistan and Pakistan grabbed whoever was not one of them and sold their captives to Americans as “terrorists.”)
According to Carrie Johnson, a Washington Post staff writer, on October 30, 2008, a federal jury in Miami convicted Charles Taylor’s son, Chuckie, of torture. Chuckie will be sentenced by the indispensable Americans in January for torture, conspiracy and firearms violations. He may spend the rest of his life in an American prison.
While Chuckie’s trial was underway, the Bush regime was torturing people.
The Washington Post writes that Chuckie’s conviction is “the first test of an American law that gives prosecutors the power to bring charges for acts of torture committed in foreign lands.” In other words, US law against torture applies to the entire world, to every other country except the United States. The hubris is unimaginable – no country can torture except the US.
Anyone else who tortures gets life, or in the case of Saddam Hussein gets hung by the neck until dead.
Isn’t it great to be an American. Our laws don’t apply to us, only to every other nation. This is what it means to be the moral light of the world, the unipower, the salt of the earth.
Neither poor Carrie Johnson nor her editors at the Washington Post see the irony or the paradox. Johnson writes in the Washington Post that the US prosecutors “accused Taylor of taking part in atrocities and directing subordinates to torture victims using . . . electrical devices from 1999 to 2002.” That charge practically overlaps in time with Bush’s, or Cheney’s, or Yoo’s, or the DOJ’s, or Rumfeld’s, or whoever’s direction to subordinates to torture people detained by Americans at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and in various CIA rendition sites. By now everyone in the world has seen the photograph of the hooded Iraqi with electrical wires attached standing on that box in Abu Ghraib.
If only American laws applied to the American government. Then the criminals who have been in charge for 8 years could be prosecuted for their extreme violation of United States laws. But, of course, the great moral American government is far above the law. American law only applies to dispensable nations. America is not answerable to law, not to its own law and not to international law. US attorney general Michael Mukasey affirmed that the US government is above all law when he told the Senate Judiciary Committee that there would be no investigation or prosecution of those Bush regime officials who authorized torture and those who carried out the sadistic acts.
The American government, the government of the great indispensable nation, has a free pass. The strong do what they will. The weak suffer what they must.
All hail the coming New World Government!
After you have read the article from a well respected source, please consider the fact that FEAR drives most to allow governments to accomplish the goal of a one world government.
Many still do not or should I say have not opened their eyes to what is coming. Most will call it one sided. He only posts one sided information. Is it really one sided? Take a newspaper and read what is typed. Can you respond to the newspaper? No you cannot but you have the choice to disagree with what's being said. I've said many things and quoted many.
The US government does not have a monopoly on hypocrisy, but no other government can match the hypocrisy of the US government.
It is now well documented and known all over the world that the US government tortured detainees at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and that the US government has had people kidnaped and “rendentioned,” that is, transported to third-world countries, such as Egypt, to be tortured.
Also documented and well known is the fact that the US Department of Justice provided written memos justifying the torture of detainees. One torture advocate who wrote the DOJ memos that gave the green light to the Bush regime’s use of torture is John Yoo, a Vietnamese immigrant who somehow secured a US Justice Department appointment and a tenured professorship at the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law.
Members of Berkeley’s city council believe that Yoo should be charged with war crimes. The US government has charged lesser offenders than Yoo with war crimes. Yoo helped the DOJ achieve the Bush regime’s goal of finding a way around the torture prohibitions of both US statutory law and the Geneva Conventions.
The way around the law that Yoo provided for the sadistic Bush regime was closed down by the US Supreme Court, which voided Yoo’s arguments, and Yoo’s torture memo was rescinded by the Department of Justice. Nevertheless, Yoo’s obvious constitutional incompetence, which in Yoo’s case is total, has not affected his position as professor of constitutional law at Berkeley. Can you imagine the harm Yoo is doing by teaching future cadres of lawyers and government officials that torture is consistent with the Constitution and the law of the land? How many of us will suffer from this ignorant man’s teachings?
But I digress. Even as the US government was torturing people, the US government was prosecuting the son of Charles Taylor, the former ruler of Liberia, for torturing political opponents of his father’s government. The US government did not employ the Yoo torture memo to justify Liberia’s use of torture against those who wished to overthrow the Liberian government or commit terror against it. The US government’s position is that Liberia’s government had no right to use torture to defend itself. Only an “indispensable nation” such as the US has the right to torture people who are imagined to threaten it.
I use the word “imagined” because approximately 99 percent of the detainees tortured by America were totally innocent people picked up at random or sold to the stupid Americans by warlords as “terrorists.” (The US government offered rewards for terrorists, like the bounty offered for outlaws in the “wild west.” The result was that warlords in Afghanistan and Pakistan grabbed whoever was not one of them and sold their captives to Americans as “terrorists.”)
According to Carrie Johnson, a Washington Post staff writer, on October 30, 2008, a federal jury in Miami convicted Charles Taylor’s son, Chuckie, of torture. Chuckie will be sentenced by the indispensable Americans in January for torture, conspiracy and firearms violations. He may spend the rest of his life in an American prison.
While Chuckie’s trial was underway, the Bush regime was torturing people.
The Washington Post writes that Chuckie’s conviction is “the first test of an American law that gives prosecutors the power to bring charges for acts of torture committed in foreign lands.” In other words, US law against torture applies to the entire world, to every other country except the United States. The hubris is unimaginable – no country can torture except the US.
Anyone else who tortures gets life, or in the case of Saddam Hussein gets hung by the neck until dead.
Isn’t it great to be an American. Our laws don’t apply to us, only to every other nation. This is what it means to be the moral light of the world, the unipower, the salt of the earth.
Neither poor Carrie Johnson nor her editors at the Washington Post see the irony or the paradox. Johnson writes in the Washington Post that the US prosecutors “accused Taylor of taking part in atrocities and directing subordinates to torture victims using . . . electrical devices from 1999 to 2002.” That charge practically overlaps in time with Bush’s, or Cheney’s, or Yoo’s, or the DOJ’s, or Rumfeld’s, or whoever’s direction to subordinates to torture people detained by Americans at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and in various CIA rendition sites. By now everyone in the world has seen the photograph of the hooded Iraqi with electrical wires attached standing on that box in Abu Ghraib.
If only American laws applied to the American government. Then the criminals who have been in charge for 8 years could be prosecuted for their extreme violation of United States laws. But, of course, the great moral American government is far above the law. American law only applies to dispensable nations. America is not answerable to law, not to its own law and not to international law. US attorney general Michael Mukasey affirmed that the US government is above all law when he told the Senate Judiciary Committee that there would be no investigation or prosecution of those Bush regime officials who authorized torture and those who carried out the sadistic acts.
The American government, the government of the great indispensable nation, has a free pass. The strong do what they will. The weak suffer what they must.
All hail the coming New World Government!
Monday, December 8, 2008
Well, well, well
I have told a few over the weekend. I am going to be a father again. This will be my 5th child. You might say that I have many children. Jesse who is my oldest is 16 so he's not really a child anymore that I have to take care of.
Having children is a blessing from Jehovah. To know that we are apart of his purpose is amazing. I know many that I've even spoken to who does not believe in God. Some even believe in a higher power.
At some point in my life I felt the same way. I did not believe in God. I felt as if it was a made up story like Santa was. As I got older I questioned why we were here. What is our purpose? Why is it that they have yet to find other planets like ours? If the Earth was closer to the sun Earth couldn't support life and if it was a bit away from the sun it couldn't support life?
Look at all the different kinds of flowers, animals, etc.. How did they get that way?
What keeps everything in order in terms of space and how we rotate around the sun. All of it just couldn't have happened by chance. At work I'm amazed off of design. I open a laptop to replace a systemboard only to notice how it was put together. I notice how one part connects to the next. I notice how all the chips are on the board. The design is simply amazing and it all works.
So when I look at pictures of the Earth or when I think of our solar system I say to myself, Amazing. There has to be something behind it. It couldn't have just happened. God made everything wonderful. There are so many who say who it all started. The Big Bang for example. How can you believe an imperfect human on creation? There are things that humans will never understand!
Like space, if it's forever then how did space itself get started? If that's the case where was God before all of it started? These are questions that we will never understand. We can give a theory but will never know the answer. Anyway, I did not forget about the beasts in Revelation. I will get to that when I get sometime. Have a great day.
Having children is a blessing from Jehovah. To know that we are apart of his purpose is amazing. I know many that I've even spoken to who does not believe in God. Some even believe in a higher power.
At some point in my life I felt the same way. I did not believe in God. I felt as if it was a made up story like Santa was. As I got older I questioned why we were here. What is our purpose? Why is it that they have yet to find other planets like ours? If the Earth was closer to the sun Earth couldn't support life and if it was a bit away from the sun it couldn't support life?
Look at all the different kinds of flowers, animals, etc.. How did they get that way?
What keeps everything in order in terms of space and how we rotate around the sun. All of it just couldn't have happened by chance. At work I'm amazed off of design. I open a laptop to replace a systemboard only to notice how it was put together. I notice how one part connects to the next. I notice how all the chips are on the board. The design is simply amazing and it all works.
So when I look at pictures of the Earth or when I think of our solar system I say to myself, Amazing. There has to be something behind it. It couldn't have just happened. God made everything wonderful. There are so many who say who it all started. The Big Bang for example. How can you believe an imperfect human on creation? There are things that humans will never understand!
Like space, if it's forever then how did space itself get started? If that's the case where was God before all of it started? These are questions that we will never understand. We can give a theory but will never know the answer. Anyway, I did not forget about the beasts in Revelation. I will get to that when I get sometime. Have a great day.
Friday, December 5, 2008
A super-sized energy crisis is brewing
On Oct. 19, Vice-President elect Joe Biden predicted that the Obama Administration would be put to the test by an "engineered" crisis within 6 months. Just like Kennedy. In fact, he "guaranteed" it.
Our research indicates that Russia is prepared to strike within four weeks after the new president is sworn in. When that happens, the global balance of power will be stretched to its breaking point.
Crisis Investing
The coming crisis will have a sense of deja vu. That's because we've seen the "dress rehearsal" played out last summer. Russia's invasion of the Caucasian country of Georgia was part of a larger plan. One dictated by Russia's desperate need to shore up its most important sources of foreign-currency revenues: Oil and natural gas.
According to globalsecurity.org, revenues from taxes on oil and natural gas equaled 5-6% of Russia's gross domestic product. That year, the U.S. Department of Energy estimated that oil and gas account for about 20% of Russia's GDP. On 27 May 2008, President Dmitry Medvedev stated that Gazprom, Russia's natural gas monopoly, contributes around 20% of the federal budget's revenues.
But that was at a time when oil was trading at $140... when Medvedev predicted prices of $500 a barrel. Now, crude oil prices are plummeting and are below the "conservative" estimates of $70 per barrel used by the Kremlin to budget for 2009.
On November 13, ChinaPost.com reported that Russia was forced to revise downwards its forecast for oil prices for the coming year from
US$95 per barrel to US$50 "and may therefore have to alter its budget". The forecast for average oil prices in 2010 had also been lowered to US$55 per barrel and to US$60 in 2011.
Unfortunately, the trajectory of crude oil prices over the past weeks indicates that estimates of $50 to $60 per barrel may be way too
optimistic: On November 13, the price of Russian oil fell below $50 per barrel for the first time since early 2007. Some experts now peg the outlook for crude as low as $10-$30 per barrel. But even prices at current levels would mean budget cuts and a sudden end to Russia's economic boom.
To make things worse, Moscow has been spending huge parts of its limited financial reserves on banking bail-outs. As of October 21, Russia's gold and forex reserves, then the world's third largest, were down $66.9 billion to $530.6 billion since early August. Between October 31 and November 7, the reserves slid another $9.2 billion to
$475.4 billion. Still, they are lower than at the start of the year.
In the period between October 17-24, the decline reached a staggering
$31 billion. Reserves further contracted due to re-evaluation as the euro sank as well as after part of international reserves was transferred to Vnesheconombank in an effort to rescue the financial system.
Over $100 billion of reserves were spent between September and October alone, representing over 20% of total reserves. Experts estimate that Russian banks and companies will have to pay out another $115.7 billion, in addition to the $47.5 billion which is to be covered by Vnesheconombank in the fourth quarter. It's not just Russia's newfound prosperity that's melting away. It's the newfound nationalist pride of the humbled Evil Empire! It's a matter of money, of pride - and of superpower leverage!
Gas and Power
With oil prices in the dumps, Russia increasingly depends on its natural gas business. That market actually turns out to be more advantageous than the oil market. After all, oil is a fungible commodity with a global market price. Natural gas, due to its complex infrastructure requirements, is far more regional. Controlling supply in one particular region can be far more profitable than competing globally for oil or gold prices.
Over the past decade, Russia has turned its natural gas business into a cash cow. It buys natural gas from the formerly Soviet countries of Central Asia at half price... and resells it to Europe at full retail.
But Europe is sick of paying full price... and increasingly suspicious of Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin!
Central Asian countries such as Turkmenistan have been chafing under Russia's patronage. A Turkmen source illustrates the seething anger:
"For Russia, arguably, the game now starts all over again. First and foremost, it is no longer the superpower in the world of natural gas as was widely regarded until recently. Turkmenistan is, unquestionably, also a gas superpower of comparable muscle power to Russia."
In the Caucasus, the West is about to establish a natural gas pipeline that runs from Central Asia through Georgia. This "Nabucco Project"
pipeline would bypass Russia-and cut deeply into its natural gas business. Nabucco is expected to be operational by 2013, pumping gas along 1,800 miles, from Turkey's borders with Georgia or Iran to Austria., which would then distribute the gas across Europe.
This has the potential to single-handedly destroy Russia's financial future. Putin simply cannot allow this to happen. That's why last summer the Russian army occupied the Georgian towns that would control the Nabucco pipeline: "With Georgia no longer in full control of its territory and other countries in the region reassessing their relations with Russia, the chances that the Europeans would be able to use Georgia, or count on Azerbaijan for its gas, appear slim," writes the International Herald Tribune's Judy Dempsey. And regardless of what Putin tells the press, they aren't leaving anytime soon.
One Down, One to Go
In Eastern Europe, the Cold-War era pipeline carrying gas into Europe runs through Belarus and Ukraine. Since Ukraine's freedom-loving president Viktor Yushchenko is a friend of the West - even applying for NATO membership - that section of the pipeline has become Russia's Achilles heel. That's because Russia's main "peace-time" weapon to keep down uppity neighbors is natural gas. Consider this:
* Ukraine relies on Russia for 71% of its gas needs.
* Hungary obtains over 80% of its natural gas from Russia.
* The Baltic countries, Finland, and Slovakia are almost entirely dependent on Russian supplies.
* Even Turkey receives most of its gas from Russia.
Right now, the European Union has to import 57% of its natural gas.
This will rise to 84% by 2030. Much will come from Russia. And most of this gas is still shipped through that Cold War-era pipeline that crosses Ukraine. The two countries have a history of pipeline-related hostilities!
Russia's gas monopoly Gazprom has choked off gas flows to Ukraine in the past: Russia doubled the gas price for Ukraine in 2006... raised it by 37% in 2007... and by 38% this year. When Ukraine couldn't pay, they simply cut off gas deliveries. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in June that his country may double the gas price again for 2009. In view of its budget situation and the continuing efforts to push through the Nabucco Project, Russia needs to strike again. The timing is crucial. It will have to happen when...
* Ukraine and Europe require gas most, in the dead of winter...
* The probability of U.S. interference is minimal, due to an inexperienced, "non-confrontational" new administration...
* The economic situation in Europe is critical thanks to the recent financial crisis!
Guaranteed Crisis
Research indicates that Russia will make its move after Inauguration Day (Jan. 20). Most likely, it will happen during the week between Feb. 13 and Feb. 20. Here's how it will go down:
* Russia will double gas prices for Ukraine, quoting supply and demand. Ukraine will be unable to pay.
* Gazprom immediately will cut off natural gas deliveries.
* Ukraine's already damaged economy will grind to a standstill.
* Kiev will be forced to help itself to "transit gas" destined for Europe - and threaten to cut off the pipeline that connects Russia with the European Union.
The most powerful player in this brutal game of chess will be Gazprom.
Gazprom is a company so powerful it's sometimes called a "state within the state". Its former Chairman of the Board, Alexander Medvedev, is now the Russian president. The company was even granted the right to form its own armed security force to safeguard its pipelines against "sabotage and terrorist acts" that could disrupt gas supplies to Europe. Gazprom's "kontraktniki" are an army of mercenaries, recruited from veteran Russian special forces. They have tanks. They have helicopters. And they're backed up by the conventional and nuclear firepower of the Russian military...
Who else to come out swinging from an armed confrontation? But there's a hidden agenda behind this whole scenario... Russia is making the ultra long-term play. A few million in stock valuation lost today could be worth trillions in the long run: Russia wants to re-nationalize Gazprom at the lowest possible cost to the Russian government... and at the expense of Western shareholders! When they sell in a panic, Russia will buy at fire-sale prices.
Ticking Time Bomb
If Ukraine moves to block the pipeline, Gazprom's shock troops will move to "protect" their business interests. Gas prices will go through the roof the moment the first Russian tank rumbles across the Ukrainian border. And Russian stocks will collapse as investors pull out in a panic. Just as they did in August, when Russia invaded Georgia. Just as they did last October.
When that happens, Gazprom share prices will get destroyed. Don't be surprised if their U.S.-traded ADRs will lose 20%... or even 50%... in a single trading day. That's exactly the moment the Russian government is waiting for: As private investors bail out, the Kremlin will step in... graciously buying up shares for kopeks on the ruble. Hedge funds, institutions and private investors will lose billions
Our research indicates that Russia is prepared to strike within four weeks after the new president is sworn in. When that happens, the global balance of power will be stretched to its breaking point.
Crisis Investing
The coming crisis will have a sense of deja vu. That's because we've seen the "dress rehearsal" played out last summer. Russia's invasion of the Caucasian country of Georgia was part of a larger plan. One dictated by Russia's desperate need to shore up its most important sources of foreign-currency revenues: Oil and natural gas.
According to globalsecurity.org, revenues from taxes on oil and natural gas equaled 5-6% of Russia's gross domestic product. That year, the U.S. Department of Energy estimated that oil and gas account for about 20% of Russia's GDP. On 27 May 2008, President Dmitry Medvedev stated that Gazprom, Russia's natural gas monopoly, contributes around 20% of the federal budget's revenues.
But that was at a time when oil was trading at $140... when Medvedev predicted prices of $500 a barrel. Now, crude oil prices are plummeting and are below the "conservative" estimates of $70 per barrel used by the Kremlin to budget for 2009.
On November 13, ChinaPost.com reported that Russia was forced to revise downwards its forecast for oil prices for the coming year from
US$95 per barrel to US$50 "and may therefore have to alter its budget". The forecast for average oil prices in 2010 had also been lowered to US$55 per barrel and to US$60 in 2011.
Unfortunately, the trajectory of crude oil prices over the past weeks indicates that estimates of $50 to $60 per barrel may be way too
optimistic: On November 13, the price of Russian oil fell below $50 per barrel for the first time since early 2007. Some experts now peg the outlook for crude as low as $10-$30 per barrel. But even prices at current levels would mean budget cuts and a sudden end to Russia's economic boom.
To make things worse, Moscow has been spending huge parts of its limited financial reserves on banking bail-outs. As of October 21, Russia's gold and forex reserves, then the world's third largest, were down $66.9 billion to $530.6 billion since early August. Between October 31 and November 7, the reserves slid another $9.2 billion to
$475.4 billion. Still, they are lower than at the start of the year.
In the period between October 17-24, the decline reached a staggering
$31 billion. Reserves further contracted due to re-evaluation as the euro sank as well as after part of international reserves was transferred to Vnesheconombank in an effort to rescue the financial system.
Over $100 billion of reserves were spent between September and October alone, representing over 20% of total reserves. Experts estimate that Russian banks and companies will have to pay out another $115.7 billion, in addition to the $47.5 billion which is to be covered by Vnesheconombank in the fourth quarter. It's not just Russia's newfound prosperity that's melting away. It's the newfound nationalist pride of the humbled Evil Empire! It's a matter of money, of pride - and of superpower leverage!
Gas and Power
With oil prices in the dumps, Russia increasingly depends on its natural gas business. That market actually turns out to be more advantageous than the oil market. After all, oil is a fungible commodity with a global market price. Natural gas, due to its complex infrastructure requirements, is far more regional. Controlling supply in one particular region can be far more profitable than competing globally for oil or gold prices.
Over the past decade, Russia has turned its natural gas business into a cash cow. It buys natural gas from the formerly Soviet countries of Central Asia at half price... and resells it to Europe at full retail.
But Europe is sick of paying full price... and increasingly suspicious of Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin!
Central Asian countries such as Turkmenistan have been chafing under Russia's patronage. A Turkmen source illustrates the seething anger:
"For Russia, arguably, the game now starts all over again. First and foremost, it is no longer the superpower in the world of natural gas as was widely regarded until recently. Turkmenistan is, unquestionably, also a gas superpower of comparable muscle power to Russia."
In the Caucasus, the West is about to establish a natural gas pipeline that runs from Central Asia through Georgia. This "Nabucco Project"
pipeline would bypass Russia-and cut deeply into its natural gas business. Nabucco is expected to be operational by 2013, pumping gas along 1,800 miles, from Turkey's borders with Georgia or Iran to Austria., which would then distribute the gas across Europe.
This has the potential to single-handedly destroy Russia's financial future. Putin simply cannot allow this to happen. That's why last summer the Russian army occupied the Georgian towns that would control the Nabucco pipeline: "With Georgia no longer in full control of its territory and other countries in the region reassessing their relations with Russia, the chances that the Europeans would be able to use Georgia, or count on Azerbaijan for its gas, appear slim," writes the International Herald Tribune's Judy Dempsey. And regardless of what Putin tells the press, they aren't leaving anytime soon.
One Down, One to Go
In Eastern Europe, the Cold-War era pipeline carrying gas into Europe runs through Belarus and Ukraine. Since Ukraine's freedom-loving president Viktor Yushchenko is a friend of the West - even applying for NATO membership - that section of the pipeline has become Russia's Achilles heel. That's because Russia's main "peace-time" weapon to keep down uppity neighbors is natural gas. Consider this:
* Ukraine relies on Russia for 71% of its gas needs.
* Hungary obtains over 80% of its natural gas from Russia.
* The Baltic countries, Finland, and Slovakia are almost entirely dependent on Russian supplies.
* Even Turkey receives most of its gas from Russia.
Right now, the European Union has to import 57% of its natural gas.
This will rise to 84% by 2030. Much will come from Russia. And most of this gas is still shipped through that Cold War-era pipeline that crosses Ukraine. The two countries have a history of pipeline-related hostilities!
Russia's gas monopoly Gazprom has choked off gas flows to Ukraine in the past: Russia doubled the gas price for Ukraine in 2006... raised it by 37% in 2007... and by 38% this year. When Ukraine couldn't pay, they simply cut off gas deliveries. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in June that his country may double the gas price again for 2009. In view of its budget situation and the continuing efforts to push through the Nabucco Project, Russia needs to strike again. The timing is crucial. It will have to happen when...
* Ukraine and Europe require gas most, in the dead of winter...
* The probability of U.S. interference is minimal, due to an inexperienced, "non-confrontational" new administration...
* The economic situation in Europe is critical thanks to the recent financial crisis!
Guaranteed Crisis
Research indicates that Russia will make its move after Inauguration Day (Jan. 20). Most likely, it will happen during the week between Feb. 13 and Feb. 20. Here's how it will go down:
* Russia will double gas prices for Ukraine, quoting supply and demand. Ukraine will be unable to pay.
* Gazprom immediately will cut off natural gas deliveries.
* Ukraine's already damaged economy will grind to a standstill.
* Kiev will be forced to help itself to "transit gas" destined for Europe - and threaten to cut off the pipeline that connects Russia with the European Union.
The most powerful player in this brutal game of chess will be Gazprom.
Gazprom is a company so powerful it's sometimes called a "state within the state". Its former Chairman of the Board, Alexander Medvedev, is now the Russian president. The company was even granted the right to form its own armed security force to safeguard its pipelines against "sabotage and terrorist acts" that could disrupt gas supplies to Europe. Gazprom's "kontraktniki" are an army of mercenaries, recruited from veteran Russian special forces. They have tanks. They have helicopters. And they're backed up by the conventional and nuclear firepower of the Russian military...
Who else to come out swinging from an armed confrontation? But there's a hidden agenda behind this whole scenario... Russia is making the ultra long-term play. A few million in stock valuation lost today could be worth trillions in the long run: Russia wants to re-nationalize Gazprom at the lowest possible cost to the Russian government... and at the expense of Western shareholders! When they sell in a panic, Russia will buy at fire-sale prices.
Ticking Time Bomb
If Ukraine moves to block the pipeline, Gazprom's shock troops will move to "protect" their business interests. Gas prices will go through the roof the moment the first Russian tank rumbles across the Ukrainian border. And Russian stocks will collapse as investors pull out in a panic. Just as they did in August, when Russia invaded Georgia. Just as they did last October.
When that happens, Gazprom share prices will get destroyed. Don't be surprised if their U.S.-traded ADRs will lose 20%... or even 50%... in a single trading day. That's exactly the moment the Russian government is waiting for: As private investors bail out, the Kremlin will step in... graciously buying up shares for kopeks on the ruble. Hedge funds, institutions and private investors will lose billions
Thursday, December 4, 2008
In a sense
Things must get worse before it gets better. Bailouts no matter what the cost will not work. The stock market will fall. You need to understand what is behind it all and who is behind it all.
The Depression is here folks. You might say it isn't but say that to those who just lost their home or lost their job. You think it's bad now, wait till next year and the year after and maybe even after that. It's going to take sometime before this economy recovers. For all those who voted for Obama thinking he had all of the solutions were wrong. The same folks that will be in his administration is the same folks who Clinton would have chosen.
We are change wasn't change at all. The only change and I will quote Obama when asked what is the change he stated " I am the change " meaning that the change is just a new administration. It's amazing how quickly people forget what was said during the debates between Obama and Clinton. They will say whatever they have to say in order to get in office. I call it the political musical chairs.
All of this is happening for a reason. Think of the League of Nations and why it was formed. Think of the United Nations and why it was formed. Both out of fear and if you disagree then you need to research my friend and also note that its interesting that money was funding both sides in most if not all of the wars.
Tomorrow I will discuss the beasts found in Revelation....
The Depression is here folks. You might say it isn't but say that to those who just lost their home or lost their job. You think it's bad now, wait till next year and the year after and maybe even after that. It's going to take sometime before this economy recovers. For all those who voted for Obama thinking he had all of the solutions were wrong. The same folks that will be in his administration is the same folks who Clinton would have chosen.
We are change wasn't change at all. The only change and I will quote Obama when asked what is the change he stated " I am the change " meaning that the change is just a new administration. It's amazing how quickly people forget what was said during the debates between Obama and Clinton. They will say whatever they have to say in order to get in office. I call it the political musical chairs.
All of this is happening for a reason. Think of the League of Nations and why it was formed. Think of the United Nations and why it was formed. Both out of fear and if you disagree then you need to research my friend and also note that its interesting that money was funding both sides in most if not all of the wars.
Tomorrow I will discuss the beasts found in Revelation....
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Hit TV Series To Feature 9/11 Conspiracy Plot
The hit TV series Rescue Me, a drama about New York City firefighters, is set to feature a 9/11 conspiracy plot in the first ten episodes of the new series, according to the show’s main star Denis Leary.
Leary revealed the details during a book signing in Los Angeles, where he also offered his forthright personal opinion on the collapse of WTC Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that collapsed into its own footprint on the late afternoon of 9/11 despite not being hit by a plane.
“When asked by a hesitant fan as to whether or not the actor thought there should be a reinvestigation into the events leading up to and surrounding the 9/11 tragedy, Leary’s eyes lit up as he revealed that conspiracy and reinvestigation into 9/11 are, in fact, major plot lines in the first 10 episodes of Rescue Me season 5, set to premiere in April 2009 for a 22-episode run on FX,” reports L.A. Weekly.
But Leary deflected questions about the collapse of Building 7, stating, “You guys don’t want to get into that with me,” adding that he “knew several of the guys who had been there working to hold that building up.”
Perhaps Leary also knows some of the people who are on tape on 9/11 saying that the building is “about to blow up” too? Perhaps Leary can help explain how a massive skyscraper which had been structurally reinforced can implode within 7 seconds after suffering limited fires across no more than ten floors and in doing so completely defy the laws of physics?
Perhaps Leary’s friends can tell us why the Windsor Building in Madrid burned like a raging inferno for 24 hours yet retained its structural integrity?
The L.A. Weekly failed to report what happened at the end of the conversation. After the question about Building 7, security thugs stepped in, blocked the camera and proceeded to kick the protagonists out of the bookstore. There was no hostility or impoliteness on the part of the 9/11 truthers, but apparently Leary’s security thinks it necessary to physically eject anyone who expresses an opinion different to his.
The real hero in all of this is obviously Daniel Sunjata, who co-stars in Rescue Me. Sunjata has been a vocal advocate for the 9/11 truth movement in questioning 9/11 and he likely had a massive influence on the decision of the script writers to dramatize the issue.
The prevalence of 9/11 truth in a plethora of different mediums is exactly what is required to spread the truth and wake up people who would not necessarily come into contact with this information through the usual channels.
I applaud the staff of Rescue Me for having the fortitude to tackle this vital issue.
Leary revealed the details during a book signing in Los Angeles, where he also offered his forthright personal opinion on the collapse of WTC Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that collapsed into its own footprint on the late afternoon of 9/11 despite not being hit by a plane.
“When asked by a hesitant fan as to whether or not the actor thought there should be a reinvestigation into the events leading up to and surrounding the 9/11 tragedy, Leary’s eyes lit up as he revealed that conspiracy and reinvestigation into 9/11 are, in fact, major plot lines in the first 10 episodes of Rescue Me season 5, set to premiere in April 2009 for a 22-episode run on FX,” reports L.A. Weekly.
But Leary deflected questions about the collapse of Building 7, stating, “You guys don’t want to get into that with me,” adding that he “knew several of the guys who had been there working to hold that building up.”
Perhaps Leary also knows some of the people who are on tape on 9/11 saying that the building is “about to blow up” too? Perhaps Leary can help explain how a massive skyscraper which had been structurally reinforced can implode within 7 seconds after suffering limited fires across no more than ten floors and in doing so completely defy the laws of physics?
Perhaps Leary’s friends can tell us why the Windsor Building in Madrid burned like a raging inferno for 24 hours yet retained its structural integrity?
The L.A. Weekly failed to report what happened at the end of the conversation. After the question about Building 7, security thugs stepped in, blocked the camera and proceeded to kick the protagonists out of the bookstore. There was no hostility or impoliteness on the part of the 9/11 truthers, but apparently Leary’s security thinks it necessary to physically eject anyone who expresses an opinion different to his.
The real hero in all of this is obviously Daniel Sunjata, who co-stars in Rescue Me. Sunjata has been a vocal advocate for the 9/11 truth movement in questioning 9/11 and he likely had a massive influence on the decision of the script writers to dramatize the issue.
The prevalence of 9/11 truth in a plethora of different mediums is exactly what is required to spread the truth and wake up people who would not necessarily come into contact with this information through the usual channels.
I applaud the staff of Rescue Me for having the fortitude to tackle this vital issue.
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
No man will ever know
I mentioned this before that no one on this Earth will know when the End of the World will happen. It's safe to say that it will happen. My belief is that God will transform the planet into what is was supposed to be when he created the Garden of Eden but many point to the date December 21, 2012.
Why that date? Well there are several reasons. One of course which is the most talked about, the Mayan. Their end date calendar happens to end on Dec 21, 2012. The most interesting thing about them is the fact that their Calendar is more accurate than our own.
Maya people were masters of mathematics and calendars and they were keeping track of time using three separate calendars. For predictions about the beginning and end of the “world” they used “Long Count” calender. And on December 21st 2012, the Long Count will be at the point zero which Maya predicts as the end of time and beginning of the new world. The Mayas were very accurate in their predictions and they predicted invasions on their soil and the World Wars.
Books in Mayan hieroglyphic writing that survived the Spanish conquest. They are made of fig-bark paper folded like an accordion, with covers of jaguar skin. Though most Mayan books were destroyed as pagan by Spanish priests, four are known to have survived: the Dresden Codex, probably dating from the 11th or 12th century, a copy of earlier texts of the 5th – 9th century; the Madrid Codex, dating from the 15th century; the Paris Codex, slightly older than the Madrid Codex; and the Grolier Codex, discovered in 1971 and dated to the 13th century. They deal with astronomical calculations, divination, and ritual.
Is it really the end of the world? The scriptures tell us that God did not create the world for nothing so I doubt it's the end of the planet but even the scriptures tell us about the end of the world. Again not world but the people on it. Jesus mentioned in the book of Matthew about people finding two gates. One which will lead to life and few are finding it and many are on the road leading off into destruction as found in Matthew chapter 7 verse 13 and 14. He also mentions that the road to life is cramped.
This verse thus tells us that many will indeed die but few will survive what is coming but Jesus himself did not say that the end was 2012. Again, no man knows when it will happen but as mentioned Jesus himself mentioned that many will die. What else will happen in 2012?
They mentioned a pole shift. Pole shift theory is almost always discussed in the context of Earth, but other solar system bodies may have experienced axial reorientation . Pole shift theories are not the same as plate tectonics, the well-accepted geological theory that the Earth’s surface consists of solid plates which shift with continental drift.
Neither are pole shift theories are also not the same as Geomagnetic reversal, the periodic reversal of the earth’s magnetic field (effectively switching the north and south magnetic poles). Geomagnetic reversal has more acceptance in the scientific community than pole shift theories.
In 2012 the next polar reversal will take place on earth. This means that the North Pole will be changed into the South Pole. Scientifically this can only be explained by the fact that the earth will start rotating in the opposite direction. What will happen to the Earth when that happens? Nothing but what will happen to the people on the Earth? Our ancestors have lived through a number of polar reversals, and we're still here, so no need to fret!
In the first quarter of 2001, the Sun switched magnetic poles. This occurs every eleven years. Prior to this the Sun's north magnetic pole was at the north rotational pole. Now the Sun's north magnetic pole is at its south pole. Since opposite poles attract, the magnetic poles of the Earth and Sun are now at their most stable.
Just about the time of 2012 Winter Solstice, the Sun's poles will switch back. During this switch there will be a tendency for the Sun's magnetic field to pull the Earth's field with it.
If the Earth's magnetic poles switch, this would put stress on the planet aggravating earthquakes and volcanos, not to mention destruction of the electrical power distribution grid. All in 2012....Interesting isn't it. Well if that wasn't bad enough in 2012 they also say that a planet called Nibiru will be seen March 2009 by telescope and in 2010 by every human on the planet. Why? They say this planet's orbit every 3600 years or so will come in between the Earth and the Sun thus causing issues on the Earth. Because of those issues they expect that 90 percent of the population will die. Narrow is the gate that leads to life.
What are my personal thoughts on 2012. Well, pole reversal has happened before and as mentioned we are still here. God did not create the planet for nothing. To say that mayan 2012 is the end date and others who have predicted an end date have all been wrong.
1980: Leland Jensen leader of a Baha'i Faith group, predicted that a nuclear disaster would happen in 1980. This would be followed by two decades of conflict, ending in the establishment of God's Kingdom on earth.
1981: Arnold Murray of the Shepherd's Chapel taught an anti-Trinitarian belief about God, and Christian Identity. Back in the 1970's, he predicted that the Antichrist would appear before 1981.
Rev. Sun Myung Moon, founder of the Unification Church predicted that the Kingdom of Heaven would be established this year.
1982: Pat Robertson predicted a few years in advance that the world would end in the fall of 1982. The failure of this prophecy did not seem to adversely affect his reputation.
1982: Astronomers John Gribben & Setphen Plagemann predicted the "Jupiter Effect" in 1974. They wrote that when various planets were aligned on the same side of the sun, tidal forces would create solar flares, radio interruptions, rainfall and temperature disturbances and massive earthquakes. The planets did align as seen from earth, as they do regularly. Nothing unusual happened.
1984 to 1999: In 1983, Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, later called Osho, teacher of what has been called the Rajneesh movement, is said to have predicted massive destruction on earth, including natural disasters and man-made catastrophes. Floods larger than any since Noah, extreme earthquakes, very destructive volcano eruptions, nuclear wars etc. were to happen. Tokyo, New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Bombay will all disappear. Actually, the predictions were read out by his secretary; their legitimacy is doubtful.
1985: Arnold Murray of the Shepherd's Chapel predicted that the war of Armageddon will start on 1985-JUN 8-9 in "a valley of the Alaskan peninsula."
1986: Moses David of The Children of God faith group predicted that the Battle of Armageddon would take place in 1986. Russia would defeat Israel and the United States. A worldwide Communist dictatorship would be established. In 1993, Christ would return to earth.
1987 to 2000: Lester Sumrall, in his 1987 book "I Predict 2000 AD" predicted that Jerusalem would be the richest city on Earth, that the Common Market would rule Europe, and that there would be a nuclear war involving Russia and perhaps the U.S. Also, he prophesized that the greatest Christian revival in the history of the church would happen: all during the last 13 years of the 20th century. All of the predictions failed.
1988: Hal Lindsey had predicted in his book "The Late, Great Planet Earth" that the Rapture was coming in 1988 - one generation or 40 years after the creation of the state of Israel. This failed prophecy did not appear to damage his reputation. He continues to write books of prophecy which sell very well indeed.
bullet Alfred Schmielewsky, a psychic whose stage name was "super-psychic A.S. Narayana," predicted in 1986 that the world's greatest natural disaster would hit Montreal in 1988. Sadly, his psychic abilities failed him on 1999-APR-11 when he answered the door of his home only to be shot dead by a gunman.
1988-MAY: A 1981 movie titled "The man who saw tomorrow" described some of Nostradamus predictions. Massive earthquakes were predicted for San Francisco and Los Angeles.
1988-OCT-11: Edgar Whisenaut, a NASA scientist, had published the book "88 Reasons why the Rapture will Occur in 1988." It sold over 4 million copies.
About 1990: Peter Ruckman concluded from his analysis of the Bible that the rapture would come within a few years of 1990.
Everyone has predicted and have been wrong.........The end will indeed come but to make a long story just a bit shorter...We have no idea when it will happen.....
Why that date? Well there are several reasons. One of course which is the most talked about, the Mayan. Their end date calendar happens to end on Dec 21, 2012. The most interesting thing about them is the fact that their Calendar is more accurate than our own.
Maya people were masters of mathematics and calendars and they were keeping track of time using three separate calendars. For predictions about the beginning and end of the “world” they used “Long Count” calender. And on December 21st 2012, the Long Count will be at the point zero which Maya predicts as the end of time and beginning of the new world. The Mayas were very accurate in their predictions and they predicted invasions on their soil and the World Wars.
Books in Mayan hieroglyphic writing that survived the Spanish conquest. They are made of fig-bark paper folded like an accordion, with covers of jaguar skin. Though most Mayan books were destroyed as pagan by Spanish priests, four are known to have survived: the Dresden Codex, probably dating from the 11th or 12th century, a copy of earlier texts of the 5th – 9th century; the Madrid Codex, dating from the 15th century; the Paris Codex, slightly older than the Madrid Codex; and the Grolier Codex, discovered in 1971 and dated to the 13th century. They deal with astronomical calculations, divination, and ritual.
Is it really the end of the world? The scriptures tell us that God did not create the world for nothing so I doubt it's the end of the planet but even the scriptures tell us about the end of the world. Again not world but the people on it. Jesus mentioned in the book of Matthew about people finding two gates. One which will lead to life and few are finding it and many are on the road leading off into destruction as found in Matthew chapter 7 verse 13 and 14. He also mentions that the road to life is cramped.
This verse thus tells us that many will indeed die but few will survive what is coming but Jesus himself did not say that the end was 2012. Again, no man knows when it will happen but as mentioned Jesus himself mentioned that many will die. What else will happen in 2012?
They mentioned a pole shift. Pole shift theory is almost always discussed in the context of Earth, but other solar system bodies may have experienced axial reorientation . Pole shift theories are not the same as plate tectonics, the well-accepted geological theory that the Earth’s surface consists of solid plates which shift with continental drift.
Neither are pole shift theories are also not the same as Geomagnetic reversal, the periodic reversal of the earth’s magnetic field (effectively switching the north and south magnetic poles). Geomagnetic reversal has more acceptance in the scientific community than pole shift theories.
In 2012 the next polar reversal will take place on earth. This means that the North Pole will be changed into the South Pole. Scientifically this can only be explained by the fact that the earth will start rotating in the opposite direction. What will happen to the Earth when that happens? Nothing but what will happen to the people on the Earth? Our ancestors have lived through a number of polar reversals, and we're still here, so no need to fret!
In the first quarter of 2001, the Sun switched magnetic poles. This occurs every eleven years. Prior to this the Sun's north magnetic pole was at the north rotational pole. Now the Sun's north magnetic pole is at its south pole. Since opposite poles attract, the magnetic poles of the Earth and Sun are now at their most stable.
Just about the time of 2012 Winter Solstice, the Sun's poles will switch back. During this switch there will be a tendency for the Sun's magnetic field to pull the Earth's field with it.
If the Earth's magnetic poles switch, this would put stress on the planet aggravating earthquakes and volcanos, not to mention destruction of the electrical power distribution grid. All in 2012....Interesting isn't it. Well if that wasn't bad enough in 2012 they also say that a planet called Nibiru will be seen March 2009 by telescope and in 2010 by every human on the planet. Why? They say this planet's orbit every 3600 years or so will come in between the Earth and the Sun thus causing issues on the Earth. Because of those issues they expect that 90 percent of the population will die. Narrow is the gate that leads to life.
What are my personal thoughts on 2012. Well, pole reversal has happened before and as mentioned we are still here. God did not create the planet for nothing. To say that mayan 2012 is the end date and others who have predicted an end date have all been wrong.
1980: Leland Jensen leader of a Baha'i Faith group, predicted that a nuclear disaster would happen in 1980. This would be followed by two decades of conflict, ending in the establishment of God's Kingdom on earth.
1981: Arnold Murray of the Shepherd's Chapel taught an anti-Trinitarian belief about God, and Christian Identity. Back in the 1970's, he predicted that the Antichrist would appear before 1981.
Rev. Sun Myung Moon, founder of the Unification Church predicted that the Kingdom of Heaven would be established this year.
1982: Pat Robertson predicted a few years in advance that the world would end in the fall of 1982. The failure of this prophecy did not seem to adversely affect his reputation.
1982: Astronomers John Gribben & Setphen Plagemann predicted the "Jupiter Effect" in 1974. They wrote that when various planets were aligned on the same side of the sun, tidal forces would create solar flares, radio interruptions, rainfall and temperature disturbances and massive earthquakes. The planets did align as seen from earth, as they do regularly. Nothing unusual happened.
1984 to 1999: In 1983, Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, later called Osho, teacher of what has been called the Rajneesh movement, is said to have predicted massive destruction on earth, including natural disasters and man-made catastrophes. Floods larger than any since Noah, extreme earthquakes, very destructive volcano eruptions, nuclear wars etc. were to happen. Tokyo, New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Bombay will all disappear. Actually, the predictions were read out by his secretary; their legitimacy is doubtful.
1985: Arnold Murray of the Shepherd's Chapel predicted that the war of Armageddon will start on 1985-JUN 8-9 in "a valley of the Alaskan peninsula."
1986: Moses David of The Children of God faith group predicted that the Battle of Armageddon would take place in 1986. Russia would defeat Israel and the United States. A worldwide Communist dictatorship would be established. In 1993, Christ would return to earth.
1987 to 2000: Lester Sumrall, in his 1987 book "I Predict 2000 AD" predicted that Jerusalem would be the richest city on Earth, that the Common Market would rule Europe, and that there would be a nuclear war involving Russia and perhaps the U.S. Also, he prophesized that the greatest Christian revival in the history of the church would happen: all during the last 13 years of the 20th century. All of the predictions failed.
1988: Hal Lindsey had predicted in his book "The Late, Great Planet Earth" that the Rapture was coming in 1988 - one generation or 40 years after the creation of the state of Israel. This failed prophecy did not appear to damage his reputation. He continues to write books of prophecy which sell very well indeed.
bullet Alfred Schmielewsky, a psychic whose stage name was "super-psychic A.S. Narayana," predicted in 1986 that the world's greatest natural disaster would hit Montreal in 1988. Sadly, his psychic abilities failed him on 1999-APR-11 when he answered the door of his home only to be shot dead by a gunman.
1988-MAY: A 1981 movie titled "The man who saw tomorrow" described some of Nostradamus predictions. Massive earthquakes were predicted for San Francisco and Los Angeles.
1988-OCT-11: Edgar Whisenaut, a NASA scientist, had published the book "88 Reasons why the Rapture will Occur in 1988." It sold over 4 million copies.
About 1990: Peter Ruckman concluded from his analysis of the Bible that the rapture would come within a few years of 1990.
Everyone has predicted and have been wrong.........The end will indeed come but to make a long story just a bit shorter...We have no idea when it will happen.....
Monday, December 1, 2008
Phew
Well I hope everyone had a nice long weekend. For me, I worked some and finished some delayed projects. I read plenty and watched many videos concerning our time or should I say things that are going on right now. Several months ago I wrote on a forum and discussed torture.
I mentioned torture of the innocent. I mentioned torture of those in the middle east. The reply shocked me as I could not understand the reasoning behind his reply. He stated that since they killed 3000 Americans on 9/11 that torture was justified to those in the middle east.
Over 1 million people have died in Iraq alone. None of them had anything to do with 9/11 and that's been proven. To me and you can correct me if I'm wrong. I don't see how killing is justified. I don't see how torture can be justified. I don't care where you are from. We all bleed the same color. How can someone say that torture in any fashion is fine?
Don't you have a heart? These are supposed to be those who say they worship God? It's fine to torture another human I'll see you in church on Sunday? Simply Amazing.
Anyway, I want to thank Marag, Sworn, Soul, Tary, and Derek for not forgetting that this is just a game and friendship should be more than any game played period. Sometimes when you hang out with a group of friends playing an on-line game that you decide to leave that group to better yourself even though you gave so much of your time, why should they act as if they never knew you? I could revisit this and go over it again but I would rather leave it where it is and move on.
Any game, I don't care what it is should not come between any friendship. If it does then I guess they were never your friends to begin with. Till tomorrow...Be like Job
I mentioned torture of the innocent. I mentioned torture of those in the middle east. The reply shocked me as I could not understand the reasoning behind his reply. He stated that since they killed 3000 Americans on 9/11 that torture was justified to those in the middle east.
Over 1 million people have died in Iraq alone. None of them had anything to do with 9/11 and that's been proven. To me and you can correct me if I'm wrong. I don't see how killing is justified. I don't see how torture can be justified. I don't care where you are from. We all bleed the same color. How can someone say that torture in any fashion is fine?
Don't you have a heart? These are supposed to be those who say they worship God? It's fine to torture another human I'll see you in church on Sunday? Simply Amazing.
Anyway, I want to thank Marag, Sworn, Soul, Tary, and Derek for not forgetting that this is just a game and friendship should be more than any game played period. Sometimes when you hang out with a group of friends playing an on-line game that you decide to leave that group to better yourself even though you gave so much of your time, why should they act as if they never knew you? I could revisit this and go over it again but I would rather leave it where it is and move on.
Any game, I don't care what it is should not come between any friendship. If it does then I guess they were never your friends to begin with. Till tomorrow...Be like Job
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)