Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Friday, August 22, 2008
NIST WTC 7 Report
Shameful, Embarrassing And Completely Flawed comes to mind when reviewing this report.NIST Claims New Phenomenon Occurred For First Time Ever In Collapse Of WTC 7
Yet fails to address why ground zero workers and media outlets had prior knowledge of an extraordinary event never before observed an hour in advance,plus myriad of other ignored issues. In its final report on the collapse of WTC 7 that news outlets are reporting puts 9/11 conspiracy theories to bed,NIST claims that the never before observed new phenomenon of thermal expansion was to blame for the destruction of the building, a completely ludicrous conclusion in a report that simply ignores eyewitness testimony and hard evidence that points to the deliberate demolition of the structure.
Again - NIST completely fails to address prior knowledge of the building’s collapse, including why news outlets like the BBC and CNN reported that the building had collapsed an hour before it actually fell, as well as firefighters on the scene who are heard on video saying,Keep your eye on that building, it’ll be coming down soon.We are actually being asked to believe the impossible - that WTC 7 was the only building in history to have defied all precedent and suffered a complete and almost instantaneous collapse from fire damage alone, despite this being an impossibility if one accepts the basic laws of physics as accurate.
Think of this, If the collapse of WTC 7 came as a result of a new phenomenon and an extraordinary event that had never happened before in the history of building collapses, then why did news stations and ground zero workers know it was about to happen a hour or more in advance? This on its own completely destroys the very foundation of NIST’s assertion that a new phenomenon was responsible for the collapse. Which is the more likely scenario - that ground zero officials and media outlets got word that the building was going to be pulled - or that they employed clairvoyant powers of deduction that enabled them to foresee an event that had never happened before in history to a building that was structurally reinforced and had suffered limited fires?
NIST claims that the collapse of Building 7 is The first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building.The issue of molten metal, which was discovered under both the twin towers and WTC 7, suggesting an extremely hot burning agent was used in the demolition process, is completely ignored in NIST’s report, despite it being acknowledged in Appendix C of FEMA’s World Trade Center Building Performance Study, which stated:
Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel… The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.There were numerous close proximity eyewitnesses who reported loud explosions, including NYPD officer Craig Bartmer and ground zero first responder Kevin McPadden (who also experienced the countdown before the building fell), but this fact was again simply ignored by NIST.
The core of NIST’s explanation, that an extraordinary event called thermal expansion was to blame for the sudden total collapse of the building is of course on the face of it a fraud when one considers the innumerable number of buildings that have suffered roaring fires across the majority of their floors and remained standing, whereas WTC 7 suffered limited fire damage across a handful of floors. NIST also claims that the building only fell at 40% free fall speed, as if this isn’t suspicious in itself. Remember that this 47-story behemoth took just 7 seconds to completely collapse within its own footprint falling through the path of most resistance.
To claim that the collapse of WTC 7 is no longer a mystery,as chief NIST investigator Dr. Shyam Sunder stated smacks of a desperate attempt to proclaim the authority of the official story by mere words alone, when in reality NIST’s laughable new phenomenon claim, the latest in a long line of changing explanations for the obvious demolition of Building 7, only heaps more embarrassment on NIST and makes the official 9/11 story look more untrustworthy than ever before. Do the research yourself and see what you come up with. Look at buildings that were brought down and compare it to building 7.
Videos: It's coming down soon. I guess he's an expert, how the hell did he know?
Interesting:
NIST can't have it both ways. If the exterior frame was so stiff and strong, then it should have stopped the collapse, or - at the very least - we would have seen a bowing effect where tremendous opposing forces were battling each other for dominance in determining the direction of the fall.
In real life, the thick structural beams and "stiff [and strong]" exterior frame used in the building should have quickly stopped any partial collapse, unless the support columns were all blown. At the very worst, we should see a 1 or 2 floor partial collapse.And what about the pools of molten metal at ground zero for months? And why was the ground at the site of WTC 7 as hot as the ground under WTC 1 and 2?
And the New York Times wrote that partly EVAPORATED steel beams were found at WTC 7. But normal office and diesel fires are not NEARLY hot enough to evaporate steel. Hydrocarbon fires fueled by diesel (which was apparently stored at WTC 7) and normal office materials cannot evaporate steel. Steel does not evaporate unless it is heated to at least 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Everyone agrees that fires from conventional building fires are thousands of degrees cooler than that. Well, I'm not expert at all of this. I just call it how I see it but let's see what the experts say:
* The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable.
* Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition
* Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says:
"Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned and controlled demolition"
* Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes:
"Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds... ? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust."
* Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England, points out:
"WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building was small&localized therefore what is the cause?"
* A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded
* A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed "does not match the available facts" and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition.
Maybe we are all wrong and the Government is right. Oswald was the only shooter.....
Yet fails to address why ground zero workers and media outlets had prior knowledge of an extraordinary event never before observed an hour in advance,plus myriad of other ignored issues. In its final report on the collapse of WTC 7 that news outlets are reporting puts 9/11 conspiracy theories to bed,NIST claims that the never before observed new phenomenon of thermal expansion was to blame for the destruction of the building, a completely ludicrous conclusion in a report that simply ignores eyewitness testimony and hard evidence that points to the deliberate demolition of the structure.
Again - NIST completely fails to address prior knowledge of the building’s collapse, including why news outlets like the BBC and CNN reported that the building had collapsed an hour before it actually fell, as well as firefighters on the scene who are heard on video saying,Keep your eye on that building, it’ll be coming down soon.We are actually being asked to believe the impossible - that WTC 7 was the only building in history to have defied all precedent and suffered a complete and almost instantaneous collapse from fire damage alone, despite this being an impossibility if one accepts the basic laws of physics as accurate.
Think of this, If the collapse of WTC 7 came as a result of a new phenomenon and an extraordinary event that had never happened before in the history of building collapses, then why did news stations and ground zero workers know it was about to happen a hour or more in advance? This on its own completely destroys the very foundation of NIST’s assertion that a new phenomenon was responsible for the collapse. Which is the more likely scenario - that ground zero officials and media outlets got word that the building was going to be pulled - or that they employed clairvoyant powers of deduction that enabled them to foresee an event that had never happened before in history to a building that was structurally reinforced and had suffered limited fires?
NIST claims that the collapse of Building 7 is The first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building.The issue of molten metal, which was discovered under both the twin towers and WTC 7, suggesting an extremely hot burning agent was used in the demolition process, is completely ignored in NIST’s report, despite it being acknowledged in Appendix C of FEMA’s World Trade Center Building Performance Study, which stated:
Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel… The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.There were numerous close proximity eyewitnesses who reported loud explosions, including NYPD officer Craig Bartmer and ground zero first responder Kevin McPadden (who also experienced the countdown before the building fell), but this fact was again simply ignored by NIST.
The core of NIST’s explanation, that an extraordinary event called thermal expansion was to blame for the sudden total collapse of the building is of course on the face of it a fraud when one considers the innumerable number of buildings that have suffered roaring fires across the majority of their floors and remained standing, whereas WTC 7 suffered limited fire damage across a handful of floors. NIST also claims that the building only fell at 40% free fall speed, as if this isn’t suspicious in itself. Remember that this 47-story behemoth took just 7 seconds to completely collapse within its own footprint falling through the path of most resistance.
To claim that the collapse of WTC 7 is no longer a mystery,as chief NIST investigator Dr. Shyam Sunder stated smacks of a desperate attempt to proclaim the authority of the official story by mere words alone, when in reality NIST’s laughable new phenomenon claim, the latest in a long line of changing explanations for the obvious demolition of Building 7, only heaps more embarrassment on NIST and makes the official 9/11 story look more untrustworthy than ever before. Do the research yourself and see what you come up with. Look at buildings that were brought down and compare it to building 7.
Videos: It's coming down soon. I guess he's an expert, how the hell did he know?
Interesting:
NIST can't have it both ways. If the exterior frame was so stiff and strong, then it should have stopped the collapse, or - at the very least - we would have seen a bowing effect where tremendous opposing forces were battling each other for dominance in determining the direction of the fall.
In real life, the thick structural beams and "stiff [and strong]" exterior frame used in the building should have quickly stopped any partial collapse, unless the support columns were all blown. At the very worst, we should see a 1 or 2 floor partial collapse.And what about the pools of molten metal at ground zero for months? And why was the ground at the site of WTC 7 as hot as the ground under WTC 1 and 2?
And the New York Times wrote that partly EVAPORATED steel beams were found at WTC 7. But normal office and diesel fires are not NEARLY hot enough to evaporate steel. Hydrocarbon fires fueled by diesel (which was apparently stored at WTC 7) and normal office materials cannot evaporate steel. Steel does not evaporate unless it is heated to at least 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Everyone agrees that fires from conventional building fires are thousands of degrees cooler than that. Well, I'm not expert at all of this. I just call it how I see it but let's see what the experts say:
* The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable.
* Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition
* Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says:
"Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned and controlled demolition"
* Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes:
"Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds... ? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust."
* Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England, points out:
"WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building was small&localized therefore what is the cause?"
* A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded
* A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed "does not match the available facts" and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition.
Maybe we are all wrong and the Government is right. Oswald was the only shooter.....
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Should 18 be the legal drinking age?
One hundred-plus higher ed leaders (three from SoCal among them) started what they had to know would be a ferocious debate when they came out in favor of lowering the drinking age in the United States to 18. Proponents say the current law isn't working and encourages binge drinking. Opponents say younger drinkers will lead to a jump in drunk driving deaths. (This shot of students on spring break in Mexico, where the drinking age is 18, seems like fodder for both sides of the issue.)
Here is what I think and you can say I'm wrong but here goes. I think the drinking age should be 18 and this is the reason. Well, I have several reasons why. Here are my reasons why drinking should be lowered to 18.
1. They can purchase Alcohol anyway by spotting someone. Spotting someone means that you will have a person over 21 buy it anyway. You will drink anyway. It's up to the parents to teach them about the dangers of Alcohol and pray that their kids will be responsible.
2. You can join the military and go off and kill people but cannot buy a beer? I've always said that this doesn't make sense but again this is just me.
I started drinking at age 12 and because I wasn't responsible I received two DUI's. I made mistakes and it did take me some time to learn but I know that if my parents would have spent time with me and teach me about the dangers of drugs and Alcohol things might have been different. What do you think, should the legal age be 18....
Drop me an email--> Dycerulz@Gmail.com
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
This is a shocker?
Vaccines Found to Cause Diabetes in Children? This was mentioned in the Open Pediatric Medicine Journal. In a prior study, published in the journal Autoimmunity, Dr. J. Bartholomew Classen of Classen Immunotherapies and David Carey Classen of the University of Utah compared more than 100,000 children who had received between one and four doses of the hemophilus vaccine with more than 100,000 unvaccinated children. The Classens found that after seven years, children in the vaccination group had a 26 percent higher risk of developing diabetes than children in the non-vaccine group. This amounted to an extra 54 cases of diabetes per 100,000 children vaccinated.
The Classens noted that the vaccine itself is only projected to prevent seven deaths and seven to 26 cases of permanent disability per 100,000 children.
“Our results conclusively prove there is a causal relationship between immunization schedules and diabetes,” J. Bartholomew Classen said at the time.
In the more recent study, Classen examined data on the same vaccine, this time looking only at children who had a sibling with Type 2 diabetes. He found that the hemophilus vaccine led to an extra case of diabetes in one of every 50 such children, or 2 percent. This is 40 times higher than the already-elevated rate found in the Autoimmunity study.
“The recent data shows that common childhood vaccines are especially dangerous to children with a strong family history of diabetes,” Classen said. “Parents of a child with a strong family history of insulin-dependent diabetes … should know that the administration of a full series of vaccines may have a greater than 5 percent chance of causing their child to develop diabetes.”Another study, published in the same issue of the Open Pediatric Medicine Journal, demonstrated a connection between the hepatitis B vaccine and Type 2 diabetes. Folks, this is what is going to happen. There will be an outbreak of some kind. I'm guessing like the bird flu or something of that nature. The Government will ask that everyone get vaccinated against it. This will appear to give you protection but in the long run since there are NO studies on what vaccinations can do to you in the long run, this vaccine will kill you or at least decrease your lifespan by 10 years or more. If you take care of yourself it's very possible that your own immune system will defeat most that enters the body.
In other news. I mentioned how Global Warming was a fraud and now it appears that the entire Global Warming fraud is about to come out in the open. As evidence builds of the earth entering a dramatic cooling trend, another scientist has gone public with his conviction that we are about to enter a new ice age, rendering warnings about global warming fraudulent and irrelevant.The models and forecasts of the IPCC is incorrect because only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity. A dramatic cooling trend is being observed across the planet even as people like Al Gore continue to claim that the threat of global warming mandates the poor and middle class be hit with CO2 taxes in order to prevent climate change.Both anecdotal evidence and hard data indicates that the planet is in the beginning stages of a significant downturn in global temperatures.
The reason? Sunspot activity has dwindled. There have only been a handful of days in the past two months where any sunspot activity has been observed and over 400 spotless days have been recorded in the current solar cycle.The sun’s surface has been fairly blank for the last couple of years, and that has some worried that it may be entering another Maunder minimum, the sun’s 50-year abstinence from sunspots, which some scientists have linked to the Little Ice Age of the 17th century.
Since the sun, and not carbon dioxide, is the principle driver of climate change, a dearth of sunspot activity would herald a repeat of the Maunder Minimum, the name given to the period roughly from 1645 to 1715, when sunspots became exceedingly rare and contributed to the onset of the Little Ice Age during which Europe and North America were hit by bitterly cold winters and the Thames river in London completely froze.Long-time man-made global warming advocates NASA assure us that significant sunspot activity will return in 2012, but a recent a paper on recent solar trends by William Livingston and Matthew Penn of the National Solar Observatory in Tucson, predicts that sunspots will all but vanish after 2015. What does that mean for us?
It means that you should get ready or should I say be prepared because in the next few years the Earth will get colder. Till tomorrow. Peace!!
The Classens noted that the vaccine itself is only projected to prevent seven deaths and seven to 26 cases of permanent disability per 100,000 children.
“Our results conclusively prove there is a causal relationship between immunization schedules and diabetes,” J. Bartholomew Classen said at the time.
In the more recent study, Classen examined data on the same vaccine, this time looking only at children who had a sibling with Type 2 diabetes. He found that the hemophilus vaccine led to an extra case of diabetes in one of every 50 such children, or 2 percent. This is 40 times higher than the already-elevated rate found in the Autoimmunity study.
“The recent data shows that common childhood vaccines are especially dangerous to children with a strong family history of diabetes,” Classen said. “Parents of a child with a strong family history of insulin-dependent diabetes … should know that the administration of a full series of vaccines may have a greater than 5 percent chance of causing their child to develop diabetes.”Another study, published in the same issue of the Open Pediatric Medicine Journal, demonstrated a connection between the hepatitis B vaccine and Type 2 diabetes. Folks, this is what is going to happen. There will be an outbreak of some kind. I'm guessing like the bird flu or something of that nature. The Government will ask that everyone get vaccinated against it. This will appear to give you protection but in the long run since there are NO studies on what vaccinations can do to you in the long run, this vaccine will kill you or at least decrease your lifespan by 10 years or more. If you take care of yourself it's very possible that your own immune system will defeat most that enters the body.
In other news. I mentioned how Global Warming was a fraud and now it appears that the entire Global Warming fraud is about to come out in the open. As evidence builds of the earth entering a dramatic cooling trend, another scientist has gone public with his conviction that we are about to enter a new ice age, rendering warnings about global warming fraudulent and irrelevant.The models and forecasts of the IPCC is incorrect because only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity. A dramatic cooling trend is being observed across the planet even as people like Al Gore continue to claim that the threat of global warming mandates the poor and middle class be hit with CO2 taxes in order to prevent climate change.Both anecdotal evidence and hard data indicates that the planet is in the beginning stages of a significant downturn in global temperatures.
The reason? Sunspot activity has dwindled. There have only been a handful of days in the past two months where any sunspot activity has been observed and over 400 spotless days have been recorded in the current solar cycle.The sun’s surface has been fairly blank for the last couple of years, and that has some worried that it may be entering another Maunder minimum, the sun’s 50-year abstinence from sunspots, which some scientists have linked to the Little Ice Age of the 17th century.
Since the sun, and not carbon dioxide, is the principle driver of climate change, a dearth of sunspot activity would herald a repeat of the Maunder Minimum, the name given to the period roughly from 1645 to 1715, when sunspots became exceedingly rare and contributed to the onset of the Little Ice Age during which Europe and North America were hit by bitterly cold winters and the Thames river in London completely froze.Long-time man-made global warming advocates NASA assure us that significant sunspot activity will return in 2012, but a recent a paper on recent solar trends by William Livingston and Matthew Penn of the National Solar Observatory in Tucson, predicts that sunspots will all but vanish after 2015. What does that mean for us?
It means that you should get ready or should I say be prepared because in the next few years the Earth will get colder. Till tomorrow. Peace!!
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
Welcome again to another edition of Who's your Daddy. Just kidding. I am looking forward to rockband 2. Here is the Ion Drum Set
the cost is about $299.00. Some of the songs you can play well, I'll let the video speak for itself
or
Plus you can sing which is great. I love Rockband, Tonight I will record my 5 yr old and post the video tomorrow. It's sickness I recommend that you get it but wait till next month to get Rockband 2.
OH and before I forgot, this was aired March 4th 2001.
the cost is about $299.00. Some of the songs you can play well, I'll let the video speak for itself
or
Plus you can sing which is great. I love Rockband, Tonight I will record my 5 yr old and post the video tomorrow. It's sickness I recommend that you get it but wait till next month to get Rockband 2.
OH and before I forgot, this was aired March 4th 2001.
Monday, August 18, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
Welcome to the most Emo Blog on the net. On weekends I normally try and post movies but I didn't have a chance to get to it. Trinidad aka SkullnBones was invited to a Black Temple Guild last weekend. I told Trinidad about the invite. The way he got this invite without filling out an app was because he helped that member complete a quest. He didn't know that member was an officer in this end game guild. So the invite was given. Their Raid days were on days that didn't conflict with anything that Trinidad was doing but he felt that he could not sit behind his desk for hours on hours trying to catch that carrot on a stick. He passed on it.
I was proud of him. I would love to see black temple and I know that I can if I really wanted to but at what cost? My Freedom. I just don't have that kind of time anymore but the problem is if I'm in a casual guild I get frustrated because if the guild is to casual and I want to see more end game, I'm sure all my frustrations will return. What I have learned is what I said in the beginning. That some not all but some people are only your friends if you are in the same guild. Some people may not talk to you again if you leave their guild. I've always said that it's your money every month and that you have every right to go where you feel you can better yourself. You have every right to go where you feel you need more. Guild Masters, Officers, and Class leads pay the same amount you do. You are in control of what you do with your toons. Don't feel bad because you think you have friends.
Truth is - you don't. Some people will turn on you because you leave the guild. They act as if they don't know you anymore. For me, I'm ok with that. I can live with that. When I receive emails from those who are frustrated as well, I wonder what prevents them from leaving their guild? If you are not happy and don't feel that your guild will progress then leave. It's really that simple. You have given enough of yourself and if you don't see movement and find yourself now leveling an alt well, it might just be time to leave since it's now your second, third, or maybe fourth alt that you have because you are waiting for something to happen. If you are ok with being in a casual guild then you have found your guild if not and you wish to have more then leave and join a guild who can meet your needs. It's as simple as that. Don't worry about the so called friends you think you made because in truth most aren't your friends. They are only your friends because you are in the same guild.
I was proud of him. I would love to see black temple and I know that I can if I really wanted to but at what cost? My Freedom. I just don't have that kind of time anymore but the problem is if I'm in a casual guild I get frustrated because if the guild is to casual and I want to see more end game, I'm sure all my frustrations will return. What I have learned is what I said in the beginning. That some not all but some people are only your friends if you are in the same guild. Some people may not talk to you again if you leave their guild. I've always said that it's your money every month and that you have every right to go where you feel you can better yourself. You have every right to go where you feel you need more. Guild Masters, Officers, and Class leads pay the same amount you do. You are in control of what you do with your toons. Don't feel bad because you think you have friends.
Truth is - you don't. Some people will turn on you because you leave the guild. They act as if they don't know you anymore. For me, I'm ok with that. I can live with that. When I receive emails from those who are frustrated as well, I wonder what prevents them from leaving their guild? If you are not happy and don't feel that your guild will progress then leave. It's really that simple. You have given enough of yourself and if you don't see movement and find yourself now leveling an alt well, it might just be time to leave since it's now your second, third, or maybe fourth alt that you have because you are waiting for something to happen. If you are ok with being in a casual guild then you have found your guild if not and you wish to have more then leave and join a guild who can meet your needs. It's as simple as that. Don't worry about the so called friends you think you made because in truth most aren't your friends. They are only your friends because you are in the same guild.
Friday, August 15, 2008
TGIF
What a long week. We have been so busy that the most I do is sleep or at least that's what I will do this weekend! I've mentioned many things on this blog. It's the news and some will not believe any of it but that's ok. On another forum I mentioned everything about why I believe 9/11 was done by the Government and here are the reasons why..
THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY
1) AWOL Chain of Command
a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.
2) Air Defense Failures
a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
c. Was there an air defense standdown?
3) Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation''s capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?
4) Wargames
a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"?
5) Flight 93
Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?
THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS
6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?
7) Demolition Hypothesis
What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives?
THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS
6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?
7) Demolition Hypothesis
What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives?
FOREKNOWLEDGE & THE ALLEGED HIJACKERS
8) What did officials know? How did they know it?
a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the "Big Wedding"), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators.
b. Various individuals came into possession of specific advance knowledge, and some of them tried to warn the US prior to September 11th.
c. Certain prominent persons received warnings not to fly on the week or on the day of September 11th.
9) Able Danger, Plus - Surveillance of Alleged Hijackers
a. The men identified as the 9/11 ringleaders were under surveillance for years beforehand, on the suspicion they were terrorists, by a variety of US and allied authorities - including the CIA, the US military''s "Able Danger" program, the German authorities, Israeli intelligence and others.
b. Two of the alleged ringleaders who were known to be under surveillance by the CIA also lived with an FBI asset in San Diego, but this is supposed to be yet another coincidence.
10) Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11
A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the "Phoenix Memo," David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration''s order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the "Bojinka" plot, and John O''Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.)
11) Insider Trading
a. Unknown speculators allegedly used foreknowledge of the Sept. 11th events to profiteer on many markets internationally - including but not limited to "put options" placed to short-sell the two airlines, WTC tenants, and WTC re-insurance companies in Chicago and London.
b. In addition, suspicious monetary transactions worth hundreds of millions were conducted through offices at the Twin Towers during the actual attacks.
c. Initial reports on these trades were suppressed and forgotten, and only years later did the 9/11 Commission and SEC provide a partial, but untenable explanation for only a small number of transactions (covering only the airline put options through the Chicago Board of Exchange).
12) Who were the perpetrators?
a. Much of the evidence establishing who did the crime is dubious and miraculous: bags full of incriminating material that happened to miss the flight or were left in a van; the "magic passport" of an alleged hijacker, found at Ground Zero; documents found at motels where the alleged perpetrators had stayed days and weeks before 9/11.
b. The identities of the alleged hijackers remain unresolved, there are contradictions in official accounts of their actions and travels, and there is evidence several of them had "doubles," all of which is omitted from official investigations.
c. What happened to initial claims by the government that 50 people involved in the attacks had been identified, including the 19 alleged hijackers, with 10 still at large (suggesting that 20 had been apprehended)
THE 9/11 COVER-UP, 2001-2006
13) Who Is Osama Bin Ladin?
a. Who judges which of the many conflicting and dubious statements and videos attributed to Osama Bin Ladin are genuine, and which are fake? The most important Osama Bin Ladin video (Nov. 2001), in which he supposedly confesses to masterminding 9/11, appears to be a fake. In any event, the State Department''s translation of it is fraudulent.
b. Did Osama Bin Ladin visit Dubai and meet a CIA agent in July 2001 (Le Figaro)? Was he receiving dialysis in a Pakistani military hospital on the night of September 10, 2001 (CBS)?
c. Whether by Bush or Clinton: Why is Osama always allowed to escape?
d. The terror network associated with Osama, known as the "data base" (al-Qaeda), originated in the CIA-sponsored 1980s anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan. When did this network stop serving as an asset to covert operations by US intelligence and allied agencies? What were its operatives doing in Kosovo, Bosnia and Chechnya in the years prior to 9/11?
14) All the Signs of a Systematic 9/11 Cover-up
a. Airplane black boxes were found at Ground Zero, according to two first responders and an unnamed NTSB official, but they were "disappeared" and their existence is denied in The 9/11 Commission Report.
b. US officials consistently suppressed and destroyed evidence (like the tapes recorded by air traffic controllers who handled the New York flights).
c. Whistleblowers (like Sibel Edmonds and Anthony Shaffer) were intimidated, gagged and sanctioned, sending a clear signal to others who might be thinking about speaking out.
d. Officials who "failed" (like Myers and Eberhard, as well as Frasca, Maltbie and Bowman of the FBI) were given promotions.
15) Poisoning New York
The White House deliberately pressured the EPA into giving false public assurances that the toxic air at Ground Zero was safe to breathe. This knowingly contributed to an as-yet unknown number of health cases and fatalities, and demonstrates that the administration does consider the lives of American citizens to be expendable on behalf of certain interests.
16) Disposing of the Crime Scene
The rapid and illegal scrapping of the WTC ruins at Ground Zero disposed of almost all of the structural steel indispensable to any investigation of the collapse mechanics.
17) Anthrax
Mailings of weapons-grade anthrax - which caused a practical suspension of the 9/11 investigations - were traced back to US military stock. Soon after the attacks began in October 2001, the FBI approved the destruction of the original samples of the Ames strain, disposing of perhaps the most important evidence in identifying the source of the pathogens used in the mailings. Were the anthrax attacks timed to coincide with the Afghanistan invasion? Why were the letters sent only to media figures and to the leaders of the opposition in the Senate (who had just raised objections to the USA PATRIOT Act)?
18) The Stonewall
a. Colin Powell promised a "white paper" from the State Department to establish the authorship of the attacks by al-Qaeda. This was never forthcoming, and was instead replaced by a paper from Tony Blair, which presented only circumstantial evidence, with very few points actually relating to September 11th.
b. Bush and Cheney pressured the (freshly-anthraxed) leadership of the Congressional opposition into delaying the 9/11 investigation for months. The administration fought against the creation of an independent investigation for more than a year.
c. The White House thereupon attempted to appoint Henry Kissinger as the chief investigator, and acted to underfund and obstruct the 9/11 Commission.
19) A Record of Official Lies
a. "No one could have imagined planes into buildings" - a transparent falsehood upheld repeatedly by Rice, Rumsfeld and Bush.
b. "Iraq was connected to 9/11" - The most "outrageous conspiracy theory" of all, with the most disastrous impact.
20) Pakistani Connection - Congressional Connection
a. The Pakistani intelligence agency ISI, creator of the Taliban and close ally to both the CIA and "al-Qaeda," allegedly wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta just prior to September 11th, reportedly through the ISI asset Omar Saeed Sheikh (later arrested for the killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who was investigating ISI connections to "al-Qaeda.")
b. This was ignored by the congressional 9/11 investigation, although the senator and congressman who ran the probe (Bob Graham and Porter Goss) were meeting with the ISI chief, Mahmud Ahmed, on Capitol Hill on the morning of September 11th.
c. About 25 percent of the report of the Congressional Joint Inquiry was redacted, including long passages regarding how the attack (or the network allegedly behind it) was financed. Graham later said foreign allies were involved in financing the alleged terror network, but that this would only come out in 30 years.
21) Unanswered Questions and the "Final Fraud" of the 9/11 Commission:
a. The September 11th families who fought for and gained an independent investigation (the 9/11 Commission) posed 400-plus questions, which the 9/11 Commission adopted as its roadmap. The vast majority of these questions were completely ignored in the Commission hearings and the final report.
b. The membership and staff of the 9/11 Commission displayed awesome conflicts of interest. The families called for the resignation of Executive Director Philip Zelikow, a Bush administration member and close associate of "star witness" Condoleezza Rice, and were snubbed. Commission member Max Cleland resigned, condemning the entire exercise as a "scam" and "whitewash."
c.The 9/11 Commission Report is notable mainly for its obvious omissions, distortions and outright falsehoods - ignoring anything incompatible with the official story, banishing the issues to footnotes, and even dismissing the still-unresolved question of who financed 9/11 as being "of little practical significance."
22) Crown Witnesses Held at Undisclosed Locations
The alleged masterminds of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) and Ramzi Binalshibh, are reported to have been captured in 2002 and 2003, although one Pakistani newspaper said KSM was killed in an attempted capture. They have been held at undisclosed locations and their supposed testimonies, as provided in transcript form by the government, form much of the basis for The 9/11 Commission Report (although the Commission''s request to see them in person was denied). After holding them for years, why doesn''t the government produce these men and put them to trial?
23) Spitzer Redux
a. Eliot Spitzer, attorney general of New York State, snubbed pleas by New York citizens to open 9/11 as a criminal case
b. Spitzer also refused to allow his employee, former 9/11 Commission staff member Dietrich Snell, to testify to the Congress about his (Snell''s) role in keeping "Able Danger" entirely out of The 9/11 Commission Report.
24) NIST Omissions
After the destruction of the WTC structural steel, the official Twin Towers collapse investigation was left with almost no forensic evidence, and thus could only provide dubious computer models of ultimately unprovable hypotheses. It failed to even test for the possibility of explosives. (Why not clear this up?)
25) Radio Silence
The 9/11 Commission and NIST both allowed the continuing cover-up of how Motorola''s faulty radios, purchased by the Giuliani administration, caused firefighter deaths at the WTC - once again showing the expendability, even of the first responders.
26) The Legal Catch-22
a. Hush Money - Accepting victims'' compensation barred September 11th families from pursuing discovery through litigation.
b. Judge Hallerstein - Those who refused compensation to pursue litigation and discovery had their cases consolidated under the same judge (and as a rule dismissed).
27) Saudi Connections
a. The 9/11 investigations made light of the "Bin Ladin Airlift" during the no-fly period, and ignored the long-standing Bush family business ties to the Bin Ladin family fortune. (A company in which both families held interests, the Carlyle Group, was holding its annual meeting on September 11th, with George Bush Sr., James Baker, and two brothers of Osama Bin Ladin in attendance.)
b. The issue of Ptech.
28) Media Blackout of Prominent Doubters
The official story has been questioned and many of the above points were raised by members of the US Congress, retired high-ranking officers of the US military, the three leading third-party candidates for President in the 2004 election, a member of the 9/11 Commission who resigned in protest, a former high-ranking adviser to the George W. Bush administration, former ministers to the German, British and Canadian governments, the commander-in-chief of the Russian air force, 100 luminaries who signed the "9/11 Truth Statement," and the presidents of Iran and Venezuela. Not all of these people agree fully with each other, but all would normally be considered newsworthy. Why has the corporate-owned US mass media remained silent about these statements, granting due coverage only to the comments of actor Charlie Sheen?
GEOPOLITICS, TIMING AND POSSIBLE MOTIVES
29) "The Great Game"
The Afghanistan invasion was ready for Bush''s go-ahead on September 9, 2001, with US and UK force deployments to the region already in place or underway. This followed the failure earlier that year of backdoor diplomacy with the Taliban (including payments of $125 million in US government aid to Afghanistan), in an attempt to secure a unity government for that country as a prerequisite to a Central Asian pipeline deal.
30) The Need for a "New Pearl Harbor"
Principals in US foreign policy under the current Bush administration (including Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle and others) have been instrumental in developing long-running plans for worldwide military hegemony, including an invasion of the Middle East, dating back to the Ford, Reagan and Bush Sr. administrations. They reiterated these plans in the late 1990s as members of the "Project for a New American Century," and stated a clear intent to invade Iraq for the purpose of "regime change." After 9/11, they lost no time in their attempt to tie Iraq to the attacks.
31) Perpetual "War on Terror"
9/11 is supposed to provide carte-blanche for an open-ended, global and perpetual "War on Terror," against any enemy, foreign or domestic, that the executive branch chooses to designate, and regardless of whether evidence exists to actually connect these enemies to 9/11.
32) Attacking the Constitution
a. The USA PATRIOT Act was written before 9/11, Homeland Security and the "Shadow Government" were developed long before 9/11, and plans for rounding up dissidents as a means for suppressing civil disturbance have been in the works for decades.
b. 9/11 was used as the pretext to create a new, extra-constitutional executive authority to declare anyone an "enemy combatant" (including American citizens), to detain persons indefinitely without habeas corpus, and to "render" such persons to secret prisons where torture is practiced.
33) Legal Trillions
9/11 triggers a predictable shift of public spending to war, and boosts public and private spending in the "new" New Economy of "Homeland Security," biometrics, universal surveillance, prisons, civil defense, secured enclaves, security, etc.
34) Plundered Trillions?
On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld announced a "war on waste" after an internal audit found that the Pentagon was "missing" 2.3 trillion dollars in unaccounted assets. On September 11th, this was as good as forgotten.
35) Did 9/11 prevent a stock market crash?
Did anyone benefit from the destruction of the Securities and Exchange Commission offices at WTC 7, and the resultant crippling of hundreds of fraud investigations?
36) Resource Wars
a. What was discussed in the Energy Task Force meetings under Dick Cheney in 2001? Why is the documentation of these meetings still being suppressed?
b. Is Peak Oil a motive for 9/11 as inside job?
37) The "Little Game"
Why was the WTC privatized just before its destruction?
HISTORY
38) "Al-CIA-da?"
The longstanding relationship between US intelligence networks and radical Islamists, including the network surrounding Osama Bin Ladin. (See also point 13d.)
39) Historical Precedents for "Synthetic Terror"
a. In the past many states, including the US government, have sponsored attacks on their own people, fabricated the "cause for war," created (and armed) their own enemies of convenience, and sacrificed their own citizens for "reasons of state."
b. Was 9/11 an update of the Pentagon-approved "Project Northwoods" plan for conducting self-inflicted, false-flag terror attacks in the United States, and blaming them on a foreign enemy?
40) Secret Government
a. The record of criminality and sponsorship of coups around the world by the covert networks based within the US intelligence complex.
b. Specifically also: The evidence of crime by Bush administration principals and their associates, from October Surprise to Iran-Contra and the S&L plunder to PNAC, Enron/Halliburton and beyond.
Hmm Shall I go on. If the glove doesn't fit?
THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY
1) AWOL Chain of Command
a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.
2) Air Defense Failures
a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
c. Was there an air defense standdown?
3) Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation''s capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?
4) Wargames
a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"?
5) Flight 93
Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?
THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS
6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?
7) Demolition Hypothesis
What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives?
THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS
6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?
7) Demolition Hypothesis
What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives?
FOREKNOWLEDGE & THE ALLEGED HIJACKERS
8) What did officials know? How did they know it?
a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the "Big Wedding"), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators.
b. Various individuals came into possession of specific advance knowledge, and some of them tried to warn the US prior to September 11th.
c. Certain prominent persons received warnings not to fly on the week or on the day of September 11th.
9) Able Danger, Plus - Surveillance of Alleged Hijackers
a. The men identified as the 9/11 ringleaders were under surveillance for years beforehand, on the suspicion they were terrorists, by a variety of US and allied authorities - including the CIA, the US military''s "Able Danger" program, the German authorities, Israeli intelligence and others.
b. Two of the alleged ringleaders who were known to be under surveillance by the CIA also lived with an FBI asset in San Diego, but this is supposed to be yet another coincidence.
10) Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11
A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the "Phoenix Memo," David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration''s order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the "Bojinka" plot, and John O''Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.)
11) Insider Trading
a. Unknown speculators allegedly used foreknowledge of the Sept. 11th events to profiteer on many markets internationally - including but not limited to "put options" placed to short-sell the two airlines, WTC tenants, and WTC re-insurance companies in Chicago and London.
b. In addition, suspicious monetary transactions worth hundreds of millions were conducted through offices at the Twin Towers during the actual attacks.
c. Initial reports on these trades were suppressed and forgotten, and only years later did the 9/11 Commission and SEC provide a partial, but untenable explanation for only a small number of transactions (covering only the airline put options through the Chicago Board of Exchange).
12) Who were the perpetrators?
a. Much of the evidence establishing who did the crime is dubious and miraculous: bags full of incriminating material that happened to miss the flight or were left in a van; the "magic passport" of an alleged hijacker, found at Ground Zero; documents found at motels where the alleged perpetrators had stayed days and weeks before 9/11.
b. The identities of the alleged hijackers remain unresolved, there are contradictions in official accounts of their actions and travels, and there is evidence several of them had "doubles," all of which is omitted from official investigations.
c. What happened to initial claims by the government that 50 people involved in the attacks had been identified, including the 19 alleged hijackers, with 10 still at large (suggesting that 20 had been apprehended)
THE 9/11 COVER-UP, 2001-2006
13) Who Is Osama Bin Ladin?
a. Who judges which of the many conflicting and dubious statements and videos attributed to Osama Bin Ladin are genuine, and which are fake? The most important Osama Bin Ladin video (Nov. 2001), in which he supposedly confesses to masterminding 9/11, appears to be a fake. In any event, the State Department''s translation of it is fraudulent.
b. Did Osama Bin Ladin visit Dubai and meet a CIA agent in July 2001 (Le Figaro)? Was he receiving dialysis in a Pakistani military hospital on the night of September 10, 2001 (CBS)?
c. Whether by Bush or Clinton: Why is Osama always allowed to escape?
d. The terror network associated with Osama, known as the "data base" (al-Qaeda), originated in the CIA-sponsored 1980s anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan. When did this network stop serving as an asset to covert operations by US intelligence and allied agencies? What were its operatives doing in Kosovo, Bosnia and Chechnya in the years prior to 9/11?
14) All the Signs of a Systematic 9/11 Cover-up
a. Airplane black boxes were found at Ground Zero, according to two first responders and an unnamed NTSB official, but they were "disappeared" and their existence is denied in The 9/11 Commission Report.
b. US officials consistently suppressed and destroyed evidence (like the tapes recorded by air traffic controllers who handled the New York flights).
c. Whistleblowers (like Sibel Edmonds and Anthony Shaffer) were intimidated, gagged and sanctioned, sending a clear signal to others who might be thinking about speaking out.
d. Officials who "failed" (like Myers and Eberhard, as well as Frasca, Maltbie and Bowman of the FBI) were given promotions.
15) Poisoning New York
The White House deliberately pressured the EPA into giving false public assurances that the toxic air at Ground Zero was safe to breathe. This knowingly contributed to an as-yet unknown number of health cases and fatalities, and demonstrates that the administration does consider the lives of American citizens to be expendable on behalf of certain interests.
16) Disposing of the Crime Scene
The rapid and illegal scrapping of the WTC ruins at Ground Zero disposed of almost all of the structural steel indispensable to any investigation of the collapse mechanics.
17) Anthrax
Mailings of weapons-grade anthrax - which caused a practical suspension of the 9/11 investigations - were traced back to US military stock. Soon after the attacks began in October 2001, the FBI approved the destruction of the original samples of the Ames strain, disposing of perhaps the most important evidence in identifying the source of the pathogens used in the mailings. Were the anthrax attacks timed to coincide with the Afghanistan invasion? Why were the letters sent only to media figures and to the leaders of the opposition in the Senate (who had just raised objections to the USA PATRIOT Act)?
18) The Stonewall
a. Colin Powell promised a "white paper" from the State Department to establish the authorship of the attacks by al-Qaeda. This was never forthcoming, and was instead replaced by a paper from Tony Blair, which presented only circumstantial evidence, with very few points actually relating to September 11th.
b. Bush and Cheney pressured the (freshly-anthraxed) leadership of the Congressional opposition into delaying the 9/11 investigation for months. The administration fought against the creation of an independent investigation for more than a year.
c. The White House thereupon attempted to appoint Henry Kissinger as the chief investigator, and acted to underfund and obstruct the 9/11 Commission.
19) A Record of Official Lies
a. "No one could have imagined planes into buildings" - a transparent falsehood upheld repeatedly by Rice, Rumsfeld and Bush.
b. "Iraq was connected to 9/11" - The most "outrageous conspiracy theory" of all, with the most disastrous impact.
20) Pakistani Connection - Congressional Connection
a. The Pakistani intelligence agency ISI, creator of the Taliban and close ally to both the CIA and "al-Qaeda," allegedly wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta just prior to September 11th, reportedly through the ISI asset Omar Saeed Sheikh (later arrested for the killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who was investigating ISI connections to "al-Qaeda.")
b. This was ignored by the congressional 9/11 investigation, although the senator and congressman who ran the probe (Bob Graham and Porter Goss) were meeting with the ISI chief, Mahmud Ahmed, on Capitol Hill on the morning of September 11th.
c. About 25 percent of the report of the Congressional Joint Inquiry was redacted, including long passages regarding how the attack (or the network allegedly behind it) was financed. Graham later said foreign allies were involved in financing the alleged terror network, but that this would only come out in 30 years.
21) Unanswered Questions and the "Final Fraud" of the 9/11 Commission:
a. The September 11th families who fought for and gained an independent investigation (the 9/11 Commission) posed 400-plus questions, which the 9/11 Commission adopted as its roadmap. The vast majority of these questions were completely ignored in the Commission hearings and the final report.
b. The membership and staff of the 9/11 Commission displayed awesome conflicts of interest. The families called for the resignation of Executive Director Philip Zelikow, a Bush administration member and close associate of "star witness" Condoleezza Rice, and were snubbed. Commission member Max Cleland resigned, condemning the entire exercise as a "scam" and "whitewash."
c.The 9/11 Commission Report is notable mainly for its obvious omissions, distortions and outright falsehoods - ignoring anything incompatible with the official story, banishing the issues to footnotes, and even dismissing the still-unresolved question of who financed 9/11 as being "of little practical significance."
22) Crown Witnesses Held at Undisclosed Locations
The alleged masterminds of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) and Ramzi Binalshibh, are reported to have been captured in 2002 and 2003, although one Pakistani newspaper said KSM was killed in an attempted capture. They have been held at undisclosed locations and their supposed testimonies, as provided in transcript form by the government, form much of the basis for The 9/11 Commission Report (although the Commission''s request to see them in person was denied). After holding them for years, why doesn''t the government produce these men and put them to trial?
23) Spitzer Redux
a. Eliot Spitzer, attorney general of New York State, snubbed pleas by New York citizens to open 9/11 as a criminal case
b. Spitzer also refused to allow his employee, former 9/11 Commission staff member Dietrich Snell, to testify to the Congress about his (Snell''s) role in keeping "Able Danger" entirely out of The 9/11 Commission Report.
24) NIST Omissions
After the destruction of the WTC structural steel, the official Twin Towers collapse investigation was left with almost no forensic evidence, and thus could only provide dubious computer models of ultimately unprovable hypotheses. It failed to even test for the possibility of explosives. (Why not clear this up?)
25) Radio Silence
The 9/11 Commission and NIST both allowed the continuing cover-up of how Motorola''s faulty radios, purchased by the Giuliani administration, caused firefighter deaths at the WTC - once again showing the expendability, even of the first responders.
26) The Legal Catch-22
a. Hush Money - Accepting victims'' compensation barred September 11th families from pursuing discovery through litigation.
b. Judge Hallerstein - Those who refused compensation to pursue litigation and discovery had their cases consolidated under the same judge (and as a rule dismissed).
27) Saudi Connections
a. The 9/11 investigations made light of the "Bin Ladin Airlift" during the no-fly period, and ignored the long-standing Bush family business ties to the Bin Ladin family fortune. (A company in which both families held interests, the Carlyle Group, was holding its annual meeting on September 11th, with George Bush Sr., James Baker, and two brothers of Osama Bin Ladin in attendance.)
b. The issue of Ptech.
28) Media Blackout of Prominent Doubters
The official story has been questioned and many of the above points were raised by members of the US Congress, retired high-ranking officers of the US military, the three leading third-party candidates for President in the 2004 election, a member of the 9/11 Commission who resigned in protest, a former high-ranking adviser to the George W. Bush administration, former ministers to the German, British and Canadian governments, the commander-in-chief of the Russian air force, 100 luminaries who signed the "9/11 Truth Statement," and the presidents of Iran and Venezuela. Not all of these people agree fully with each other, but all would normally be considered newsworthy. Why has the corporate-owned US mass media remained silent about these statements, granting due coverage only to the comments of actor Charlie Sheen?
GEOPOLITICS, TIMING AND POSSIBLE MOTIVES
29) "The Great Game"
The Afghanistan invasion was ready for Bush''s go-ahead on September 9, 2001, with US and UK force deployments to the region already in place or underway. This followed the failure earlier that year of backdoor diplomacy with the Taliban (including payments of $125 million in US government aid to Afghanistan), in an attempt to secure a unity government for that country as a prerequisite to a Central Asian pipeline deal.
30) The Need for a "New Pearl Harbor"
Principals in US foreign policy under the current Bush administration (including Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle and others) have been instrumental in developing long-running plans for worldwide military hegemony, including an invasion of the Middle East, dating back to the Ford, Reagan and Bush Sr. administrations. They reiterated these plans in the late 1990s as members of the "Project for a New American Century," and stated a clear intent to invade Iraq for the purpose of "regime change." After 9/11, they lost no time in their attempt to tie Iraq to the attacks.
31) Perpetual "War on Terror"
9/11 is supposed to provide carte-blanche for an open-ended, global and perpetual "War on Terror," against any enemy, foreign or domestic, that the executive branch chooses to designate, and regardless of whether evidence exists to actually connect these enemies to 9/11.
32) Attacking the Constitution
a. The USA PATRIOT Act was written before 9/11, Homeland Security and the "Shadow Government" were developed long before 9/11, and plans for rounding up dissidents as a means for suppressing civil disturbance have been in the works for decades.
b. 9/11 was used as the pretext to create a new, extra-constitutional executive authority to declare anyone an "enemy combatant" (including American citizens), to detain persons indefinitely without habeas corpus, and to "render" such persons to secret prisons where torture is practiced.
33) Legal Trillions
9/11 triggers a predictable shift of public spending to war, and boosts public and private spending in the "new" New Economy of "Homeland Security," biometrics, universal surveillance, prisons, civil defense, secured enclaves, security, etc.
34) Plundered Trillions?
On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld announced a "war on waste" after an internal audit found that the Pentagon was "missing" 2.3 trillion dollars in unaccounted assets. On September 11th, this was as good as forgotten.
35) Did 9/11 prevent a stock market crash?
Did anyone benefit from the destruction of the Securities and Exchange Commission offices at WTC 7, and the resultant crippling of hundreds of fraud investigations?
36) Resource Wars
a. What was discussed in the Energy Task Force meetings under Dick Cheney in 2001? Why is the documentation of these meetings still being suppressed?
b. Is Peak Oil a motive for 9/11 as inside job?
37) The "Little Game"
Why was the WTC privatized just before its destruction?
HISTORY
38) "Al-CIA-da?"
The longstanding relationship between US intelligence networks and radical Islamists, including the network surrounding Osama Bin Ladin. (See also point 13d.)
39) Historical Precedents for "Synthetic Terror"
a. In the past many states, including the US government, have sponsored attacks on their own people, fabricated the "cause for war," created (and armed) their own enemies of convenience, and sacrificed their own citizens for "reasons of state."
b. Was 9/11 an update of the Pentagon-approved "Project Northwoods" plan for conducting self-inflicted, false-flag terror attacks in the United States, and blaming them on a foreign enemy?
40) Secret Government
a. The record of criminality and sponsorship of coups around the world by the covert networks based within the US intelligence complex.
b. Specifically also: The evidence of crime by Bush administration principals and their associates, from October Surprise to Iran-Contra and the S&L plunder to PNAC, Enron/Halliburton and beyond.
Hmm Shall I go on. If the glove doesn't fit?
Thursday, August 14, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
As I was walking with Trinidad yesterday there was this guy who looked as if he was at least 50 years old. There isn't a problem with being 50 but it's what he said that made me look in his direction. He was talking to his friend and how their friend was emo! Trinidad looked at me and said " Isn't that guy like 50? I guess he wants to be young again " Normally something like that would have caught my attention but I started to think of woman who dress as if they were teens and yet they are 50+ years old. I guess inside we are all children and we have yet to grow up in some ways. I mentioned a few posts ago about what pisses me off and that's when grown men hide behind toons in order to bash others. I have always been a man about things. If I couldn't say something to your face then there is no reason I should say it behind your back but it goes back. It's childish and stupid and makes a person who hid in the first place look stupid.
I have logged on and played a bit when there was nothing to do. I have chatted with a few people and have been invited to join guilds. The goal for me wasn't to leave Dragonsbane and join a guild that was in content that I wanted to see. The overall goal was to move away from my frustrations. In the process I learned who was my friends. Folks if the friends you make in game are only your friends because you are in their guild then there is something really wrong with them. Once you leave some act as if they never knew you. Isn't that amazing. It could have been years flushed down the toilet and yet that is exactly what I went through. Although I do receive email from several and receive email since this blog was posted in the wow forums by well I won't mention his name but I should thank you. Since that post the emails I received has increased. Even though you bashed me when I discussed my father and how he died there is a positive outcome from your post so again thank you.
Now on to some other stuff that's going on. I was sent this email that talked about the conflict in Russia. I wasn't going to touch on this subject since it's clear it's about oil and the pipeline that goes through Georgia. Has this ever happened before that a country was invaded because of their oil? No it would never happen. Anyway, have you ever heard of Ghost Recon or Tom Clancy? Did Tom Clancy’s lucky assertions foretell in 2001 the Georgia Conflict of 2008 and foretell in 2004 The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America(SPP)of 2005? Let's analyze Clancy’s seemingly clairvoyant references about the ongoing conflict in Georgia which include the following lucky assertions:
1. Civil unrest in Russia in August 2008- Lucky guess?
2. U.S. clandestine support of rebel factions in Georgia- Lucky guess?
3. Specifically cites South Ossetia War in 2008- Lucky guess?
4. The U.S. clandestine forces “Ghosts” are deployed in Ossetia to silence the rebellion - Lucky guess?
5. U.S. Ghosts battle South Ossetian rebel forces from the north of Georgia.
6. Russian government eventually sends in their army to aid the South Ossetian rebels - Lucky guess?
Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter (GRAW). This video game, GRAW, was originally to be released in 2004, but it was delayed for undisclosed reasons with a new target release in 2005 according to Ubisoft’s 2005 fiscal year publication listing GRAW on their release list for Xbox, PS2, PC, Xbox 360 and scratched entirely for Gamecube. In short, the development of this game took place in 2004 or prior with its release dates delayed two different times once in 2004 and again in 2005. Clancy’s plot in this video game, GRAW, commences Mexico City in 2014 as a U.S. spy plane carrying a device which disrupts wireless communications called Guardrail IX is shot down over Nicaragua. U.S. Intelligence discovers a plot to transfer the device to rebels in Mexico City, and the Ghosts, U.S. clandestine units, are sent in to retrieve it. However, the mission is aborted when a coup d’état takes place in Mexico City and the Ghosts are ordered to Mexico City immediately, where a summit involving the leaders of the United States: President Ballantine, Canada: Canadian Prime Minister (unnamed), and Mexico: President Ruiz-Peña sign the North American Joint Security Agreement (NAJSA) described in the video trailer as a historic new policy designed to share the policing responsibilities along the borders of these three countries and hopefully curtail the illegal immigration and movement of drugs weapons and terrorists in the hemisphere as part of this historic agreement.” Trailer can be seen at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtAwn1ATtcU.This supposed fictional agreement, North American Joint Security Agreement (NAJSA) sounds cynically close to the non-fictional agreement The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP).
Ironically or not,The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), which was predicated upon the writings of CFR members including Robert Pastor entitled Creating a North American Community,was agreed upon on March 23, 2005 by the heads of government, Mexico’s Vincente Fox, U.S.’s George W. Bush, and Canada’s Paul Martin launching the North American partnership (AKA: North American Union) at a meeting in Waco, Texas. Presumably, no one other than insiders had knowledge of the this agreement requiring Judicial Watch, a conservative public-interest law firm, to go through the Freedom of Information Act in Sep 26, 2006 to obtain the SPP documents
So, once again Tom Clancy got lucky in mirroring The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP)during the developmental stages of this video game, GRAW in 2004 or earlier and months or may be an year prior to the actual consummation of the SPP agreement on March 23, 2005 Mexico’s Vincente Fox, U.S.’s George W. Bush, and Canada’s Paul Martin? Virtually two years or more before Judicial Watch obtained the documents in Sep 26, 2006? What odds would actuaries calculate on Tom Clancy lucky assertions in Ghost Recon 2001 video game about
1) the current conflict in Georgia seven (7) years prior to the actual event and
2) the mirroring of “The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) with his supposed fictional agreement, North American Joint Security Agreement(NAJSA) close to one (1) year before the agreement took place and
3) two years or more before Judicial Watch obtained the documents in Sep 26, 2006? Tom Clancy’s wife second wife Alexandra Marie Llewellyn (26 July 1999 - present) is the niece of Colin Powell; interesting isn't it.
I have logged on and played a bit when there was nothing to do. I have chatted with a few people and have been invited to join guilds. The goal for me wasn't to leave Dragonsbane and join a guild that was in content that I wanted to see. The overall goal was to move away from my frustrations. In the process I learned who was my friends. Folks if the friends you make in game are only your friends because you are in their guild then there is something really wrong with them. Once you leave some act as if they never knew you. Isn't that amazing. It could have been years flushed down the toilet and yet that is exactly what I went through. Although I do receive email from several and receive email since this blog was posted in the wow forums by well I won't mention his name but I should thank you. Since that post the emails I received has increased. Even though you bashed me when I discussed my father and how he died there is a positive outcome from your post so again thank you.
Now on to some other stuff that's going on. I was sent this email that talked about the conflict in Russia. I wasn't going to touch on this subject since it's clear it's about oil and the pipeline that goes through Georgia. Has this ever happened before that a country was invaded because of their oil? No it would never happen. Anyway, have you ever heard of Ghost Recon or Tom Clancy? Did Tom Clancy’s lucky assertions foretell in 2001 the Georgia Conflict of 2008 and foretell in 2004 The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America(SPP)of 2005? Let's analyze Clancy’s seemingly clairvoyant references about the ongoing conflict in Georgia which include the following lucky assertions:
1. Civil unrest in Russia in August 2008- Lucky guess?
2. U.S. clandestine support of rebel factions in Georgia- Lucky guess?
3. Specifically cites South Ossetia War in 2008- Lucky guess?
4. The U.S. clandestine forces “Ghosts” are deployed in Ossetia to silence the rebellion - Lucky guess?
5. U.S. Ghosts battle South Ossetian rebel forces from the north of Georgia.
6. Russian government eventually sends in their army to aid the South Ossetian rebels - Lucky guess?
Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter (GRAW). This video game, GRAW, was originally to be released in 2004, but it was delayed for undisclosed reasons with a new target release in 2005 according to Ubisoft’s 2005 fiscal year publication listing GRAW on their release list for Xbox, PS2, PC, Xbox 360 and scratched entirely for Gamecube. In short, the development of this game took place in 2004 or prior with its release dates delayed two different times once in 2004 and again in 2005. Clancy’s plot in this video game, GRAW, commences Mexico City in 2014 as a U.S. spy plane carrying a device which disrupts wireless communications called Guardrail IX is shot down over Nicaragua. U.S. Intelligence discovers a plot to transfer the device to rebels in Mexico City, and the Ghosts, U.S. clandestine units, are sent in to retrieve it. However, the mission is aborted when a coup d’état takes place in Mexico City and the Ghosts are ordered to Mexico City immediately, where a summit involving the leaders of the United States: President Ballantine, Canada: Canadian Prime Minister (unnamed), and Mexico: President Ruiz-Peña sign the North American Joint Security Agreement (NAJSA) described in the video trailer as a historic new policy designed to share the policing responsibilities along the borders of these three countries and hopefully curtail the illegal immigration and movement of drugs weapons and terrorists in the hemisphere as part of this historic agreement.” Trailer can be seen at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtAwn1ATtcU.This supposed fictional agreement, North American Joint Security Agreement (NAJSA) sounds cynically close to the non-fictional agreement The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP).
Ironically or not,The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), which was predicated upon the writings of CFR members including Robert Pastor entitled Creating a North American Community,was agreed upon on March 23, 2005 by the heads of government, Mexico’s Vincente Fox, U.S.’s George W. Bush, and Canada’s Paul Martin launching the North American partnership (AKA: North American Union) at a meeting in Waco, Texas. Presumably, no one other than insiders had knowledge of the this agreement requiring Judicial Watch, a conservative public-interest law firm, to go through the Freedom of Information Act in Sep 26, 2006 to obtain the SPP documents
So, once again Tom Clancy got lucky in mirroring The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP)during the developmental stages of this video game, GRAW in 2004 or earlier and months or may be an year prior to the actual consummation of the SPP agreement on March 23, 2005 Mexico’s Vincente Fox, U.S.’s George W. Bush, and Canada’s Paul Martin? Virtually two years or more before Judicial Watch obtained the documents in Sep 26, 2006? What odds would actuaries calculate on Tom Clancy lucky assertions in Ghost Recon 2001 video game about
1) the current conflict in Georgia seven (7) years prior to the actual event and
2) the mirroring of “The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) with his supposed fictional agreement, North American Joint Security Agreement(NAJSA) close to one (1) year before the agreement took place and
3) two years or more before Judicial Watch obtained the documents in Sep 26, 2006? Tom Clancy’s wife second wife Alexandra Marie Llewellyn (26 July 1999 - present) is the niece of Colin Powell; interesting isn't it.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
What kind of place is Heaven? I touched on hell a bit and even though I could have posted information on why I believe there isn't a hell, there is a Heaven. Question is, who goes there? Do we all go there? Many times we have heard that when we die we go to Heaven. As far as I know, I don't recall anyone saying " OH this guy is going to Hell " But the question is what kind of place is Heaven? From the scriptures we do get some insight as to what kind of place Heaven is. Maybe words such as Love comes to mind or maybe the feeling of happiness. Let me ask you, if you did die and go to Heaven that would mean that you would still know who you are. You would remember the life you had on Earth.
Since you are now an Angel and filled with Love and happiness wouldn't you wonder how your family is doing on earth? If you had children wouldn't you look in on them? Many of you would but what if your wife is going through all kinds of pain. While you are in Heaven being happy, she suffers on earth. Maybe you were her means of support and now she is on the verge of being homeless. Would you still be happy in Heaven knowing that your family is suffering? If you cared about your family then Heaven wouldn't be a happy place for you. What if one of your kids were bad and ended up in Hell or should I say so called hell and you can see him from Heaven? Would Heaven be a happy place for you? Angels have different powers but just like God himself can see what's going on. You might wonder if they can see all why don't they do anything to improve our conditions here on Earth? As time moves forward you will see but for now, it's moving toward that direction. I wouldn't be happy at all. I would be suffering knowing that my family is going through so much pain.
You might reason and say that your wife will be joining you someday but that doesn't take away the pain does it? Of course not. Truth is, we don't go to Heaven and there is no hell. Does anyone go to Heaven? Yes they do but it's a limited number that we are not apart of. Here's a question - if men like Moses or Noah were good men in the eyes of God wouldn't you say that they would go to Heaven? If you say yes then tell me why did Jesus need to come then? Those men came before Jesus. They were no different than the both of us. They were imperfect just like the both of us. They made mistakes just like we do. Remember Moses was not allowed into the promise land but everyone reading knows that Moses was a good man. So if all it takes is for us to die and serve God then why did we need Jesus in the first place? Surely we didn't need Jesus to get to Heaven and since Death is being taken away in the future as mentioned in Rev 21:4 why did Jesus need to come in the first place? Let's take a look at the our father prayer word for word and ask yourself what are you praying for
Our Father in the Heavens, let your name be sanctified. Let your kingdom come. Let your will take place, as in Heaven, also upon the Earth. Give us today our bread for this day, and forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. And do not bring us into temptation but deliver us from the wicked one. etc..
Have you ever looked at what you are praying for? All of the words of course are important but look at this part. You asked God to have his will take place as in Heaven also upon the Earth. What is his will? Well what was his will in the beginning because what you are asking is his will to take place as in Heaven also upon the Earth and again what kind of place is Heaven? If he created Heaven to be a place of happiness and love what you are praying for is that same thing also upon the Earth. Interesting isn't it? Anyway, a few posts from now I'll break everything down from the beginning to the end....
Since you are now an Angel and filled with Love and happiness wouldn't you wonder how your family is doing on earth? If you had children wouldn't you look in on them? Many of you would but what if your wife is going through all kinds of pain. While you are in Heaven being happy, she suffers on earth. Maybe you were her means of support and now she is on the verge of being homeless. Would you still be happy in Heaven knowing that your family is suffering? If you cared about your family then Heaven wouldn't be a happy place for you. What if one of your kids were bad and ended up in Hell or should I say so called hell and you can see him from Heaven? Would Heaven be a happy place for you? Angels have different powers but just like God himself can see what's going on. You might wonder if they can see all why don't they do anything to improve our conditions here on Earth? As time moves forward you will see but for now, it's moving toward that direction. I wouldn't be happy at all. I would be suffering knowing that my family is going through so much pain.
You might reason and say that your wife will be joining you someday but that doesn't take away the pain does it? Of course not. Truth is, we don't go to Heaven and there is no hell. Does anyone go to Heaven? Yes they do but it's a limited number that we are not apart of. Here's a question - if men like Moses or Noah were good men in the eyes of God wouldn't you say that they would go to Heaven? If you say yes then tell me why did Jesus need to come then? Those men came before Jesus. They were no different than the both of us. They were imperfect just like the both of us. They made mistakes just like we do. Remember Moses was not allowed into the promise land but everyone reading knows that Moses was a good man. So if all it takes is for us to die and serve God then why did we need Jesus in the first place? Surely we didn't need Jesus to get to Heaven and since Death is being taken away in the future as mentioned in Rev 21:4 why did Jesus need to come in the first place? Let's take a look at the our father prayer word for word and ask yourself what are you praying for
Our Father in the Heavens, let your name be sanctified. Let your kingdom come. Let your will take place, as in Heaven, also upon the Earth. Give us today our bread for this day, and forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. And do not bring us into temptation but deliver us from the wicked one. etc..
Have you ever looked at what you are praying for? All of the words of course are important but look at this part. You asked God to have his will take place as in Heaven also upon the Earth. What is his will? Well what was his will in the beginning because what you are asking is his will to take place as in Heaven also upon the Earth and again what kind of place is Heaven? If he created Heaven to be a place of happiness and love what you are praying for is that same thing also upon the Earth. Interesting isn't it? Anyway, a few posts from now I'll break everything down from the beginning to the end....
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
I was reading an article yesterday that discussed vaccines or should I say vaccinations. This article caught my eye. It talks about Dr. Randall. Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines." With a push to mandate all vaccinations it's important that you do your research. Take for example Andrew Wakefield. He wrote an article and held a press conference about research he has done with MMR and Austim. He noted that 12 children had issues after receiving the shots recommended.
Is it possible that right now our Government is testing on us? There is no long term study of any kind if these vaccinations help in the long run. We have no clue. You know what happened to Andrew? He was fired from his position. One of the questions given to Dr.Randall was and I quote " If vaccines do harm, why give them? " End quote. This was his answer
Quote" First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network. That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there. " End quote.
If you watched the video with Dr.Horowitz it gives you a clear idea on vaccinations. The overall goal is to depopulate the planet. I promise you this that sooner or later there will be an outbreak. Is it possible that the outbreak will be the Spanish Flu? I can see this in our future. This may be there way to depopulate the world. I never had the flu and every year I'm encouraged to receive the shot and then I see those around me getting sick. What I suggest is the same thing I have always suggested. Question Everything and do research from respected sources. Do not and I repeat do not look to the Media who is controlled. Shame on them who do not report the truth. How do you feel about vaccines? Email: Dycerulz@gmail.com
Is it possible that right now our Government is testing on us? There is no long term study of any kind if these vaccinations help in the long run. We have no clue. You know what happened to Andrew? He was fired from his position. One of the questions given to Dr.Randall was and I quote " If vaccines do harm, why give them? " End quote. This was his answer
Quote" First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network. That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there. " End quote.
If you watched the video with Dr.Horowitz it gives you a clear idea on vaccinations. The overall goal is to depopulate the planet. I promise you this that sooner or later there will be an outbreak. Is it possible that the outbreak will be the Spanish Flu? I can see this in our future. This may be there way to depopulate the world. I never had the flu and every year I'm encouraged to receive the shot and then I see those around me getting sick. What I suggest is the same thing I have always suggested. Question Everything and do research from respected sources. Do not and I repeat do not look to the Media who is controlled. Shame on them who do not report the truth. How do you feel about vaccines? Email: Dycerulz@gmail.com
Monday, August 11, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
I hope that you enjoyed both movies. After watching both it's time to consider who we are and how much we mean to our Government. Are we test subjects? Was the spraying that was going to happen over the bay area a test or was it really a moth? What I loved about Sunday's video is that he backed it up with proven Documents. For anyone to say now after watching that video that something isn't wrong, I'm not sure what else I can say or try to prove. Dr.Horowitz is respected. It's not like he's someone that just wanted to make a google or youtube video. He backed up his words with de-classified documents to prove his point.
Even President Clinton apologized for what happened to Africans. Has the testing stopped? I'm sure it hasn't. Even Obama's former pastor mentioned it in his speech. He mentioned how Aids was created and the targets? Africans and Gay men. I have no doubt in my mind that most of what's out there was created. It didn't just happen. Take for example Bayer. They knowingly dumped medicine that was known to be contaminated with AIDS virus on the European market after it killed people in America.
We live in a sick world folks that is not controlled by God. I will call this operation wipeout simply because that's what I feel is planned for our future. To wipe out population. My wife thinks it's crazy. Some even want to blame global warming on population. I do not believe at all in Global warming. I mentioned in another forum about global warming and how the carbon tax introduced by Al Gore is supposed to help somehow with Global warming. If they do their research, they would know that right now the Earth is going through a Global cooling. When they first mentioned Global warming yes the earth was hot but not because of man. It was because of the sun. The earth did get hotter and how do I know it wasn't because of man? Well, the temperature on Mars and other planets increased. As far as I know, there are no Suv's on Mars. Maybe I'll post on Global warming later but for now, I hope you enjoyed both videos.
Loose change is a video that I've watched several times. I've heard someone mentioned that they(meaning Iraq or Osama) killed 3000 people in the towers and do I consider that torture? After looking at the evidence myself and the fact that no one in office wants to touch the subject, is it really hard to believe that the Government did have a hand in it? Who knew ahead of time? Who called Willie Brown? How did they know to have all those put options on the planes? Bush said he saw the first plane hit the building? He didn't. Where are the black boxes? To many questions and nobody to answer them. Even if it was proven that the Government did it, is there anything we can do? I don't know. I'm sure that many of us are in their Main Core Database who believe that it was an inside job. Watch the video again and ask questions....
Even President Clinton apologized for what happened to Africans. Has the testing stopped? I'm sure it hasn't. Even Obama's former pastor mentioned it in his speech. He mentioned how Aids was created and the targets? Africans and Gay men. I have no doubt in my mind that most of what's out there was created. It didn't just happen. Take for example Bayer. They knowingly dumped medicine that was known to be contaminated with AIDS virus on the European market after it killed people in America.
We live in a sick world folks that is not controlled by God. I will call this operation wipeout simply because that's what I feel is planned for our future. To wipe out population. My wife thinks it's crazy. Some even want to blame global warming on population. I do not believe at all in Global warming. I mentioned in another forum about global warming and how the carbon tax introduced by Al Gore is supposed to help somehow with Global warming. If they do their research, they would know that right now the Earth is going through a Global cooling. When they first mentioned Global warming yes the earth was hot but not because of man. It was because of the sun. The earth did get hotter and how do I know it wasn't because of man? Well, the temperature on Mars and other planets increased. As far as I know, there are no Suv's on Mars. Maybe I'll post on Global warming later but for now, I hope you enjoyed both videos.
Loose change is a video that I've watched several times. I've heard someone mentioned that they(meaning Iraq or Osama) killed 3000 people in the towers and do I consider that torture? After looking at the evidence myself and the fact that no one in office wants to touch the subject, is it really hard to believe that the Government did have a hand in it? Who knew ahead of time? Who called Willie Brown? How did they know to have all those put options on the planes? Bush said he saw the first plane hit the building? He didn't. Where are the black boxes? To many questions and nobody to answer them. Even if it was proven that the Government did it, is there anything we can do? I don't know. I'm sure that many of us are in their Main Core Database who believe that it was an inside job. Watch the video again and ask questions....
Sunday, August 10, 2008
Saturday, August 9, 2008
Friday, August 8, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
Hell on Earth. That's exactly what we have folks. Hell on Earth. While many believe that there is a place where Satan hangs out and that people burn forever, I don't believe in that at all. There are several reasons why I don't. One of the reasons why I don't is because I refuse to believe that God would create such a place to have people burn forever. It doesn't sound loving of him at all. It doesn't sound like something he would do. If you believe that God gave us every good thing then it's hard to believe that he would create such a place to burn people forever.
Yes I know there are evil people in this world but, look at it from this point of view. No matter how bad your son or daughter is, you wouldn't want them to burn forever would you? No parent would want that for their children. Likewise, God who is our parent wouldn't want that for us as well. I just can't believe it. Not to mention that in the book of Jeremiah 7:31 it mentions that those were burning their sons and daughters in the fire, God says that he did not command that and that it did not come into his heart. Look it up! So if it didn't come into his heart back then, why would he create such a place for people to burn forever. Look at Jeremiah 19:5 where it states the same thing. 2nd Kings 23:10 says the same thing.
What's being taught is that when the human body dies, the human soul does not die but survives, although we cannot see it with our Natural eyes. Since it leaves the body it must go somewhere, maybe the spirit world, maybe Heaven but bad souls go to hell. Heaven is a place of everlasting happiness vs hell is the opposite of heaven. Since they claim that their teaching is what the Bible says hell is, we are obliged to go directly to the bible itself to find out exactly what the bible says hell is. We must go according to what the bible says hell is, not to what others say it is. People have a way of twisting what the bible says. The difference between what I'm saying and what they are saying is I'm telling you to research yourself. In the 7th creative days, (not literal) days it took to create the heavens and earth, you don't find anything that says Hell was created.
When I say the 7 creative days - I mean that God didn't create the world in just 7 days. We are still in that 7th creative day. The way God views a day or time itself is different than how we view a day or time itself. Anyway, back to the subject at hand. Think of this point as well. When God mentioned to Adam and Eve that if they ate of the fruit, he didn't tell them they would burn forever did he? Wouldn't you think that their disobedience that effects you and I today would justify them being the first to go too hell? He didn't say that to Adam or Eve. He told them that Death would be their sentence not a place to burn forever. The Story of Cain and Abel. Cain killed his brother Abel. God didn't tell Cain that Abel was up here with me, he said that your brother's blood is crying out to me from the ground. God didn't mention to Cain that now he will burn forever and this was the first death.
On Earth, did Jesus teach that there is literal fire in hell? No he did not. Hell is a place where all of us are going. Hell is nothing more than our grave. Another word for hell is Hades or Sheol. So again Hell is nothing more than our Graves. Think of this, if Death is a means to get to Heaven or Hell why would God do away with Death if that's our only ticket to get into Heaven? Look at Revelation 21:4. It states that in the future Death will be no more. In order to understand what he means you have to understand exactly why Jesus needed to come to earth in the first place. OH Jesus came here to save us? If you say that, then yes you are correct. He had to die for us in order to balance what Adam and Eve Lost. I'll discuss that later but think about it if our means of getting to Heaven through Death is destroyed then how do we get into Heaven after God does away with death? Simple answer - we don't go to Heaven. As for hell, Look at Revelation 12:7 through 12. Notice the End of that scripture it takes that Satan knows he has a short period of time left.
So if hell is a place for people to burn forever, why would Satan have a short time left? Also think of this, in those same verses 7 through 12 it states that Satan was hurled down to the earth. Keep in mind that Satan was an Angel in the beginning. He was hurled down to the earth, him and his demons. The scriptures does not state that hell was then created and he was hurled down then. It states that he was hurled down to where? The Entire Inhabited Earth!!! and what was he doing? Misleading the Entire inhabited Earth. Thus the reason why I state in the beginning of this post " Hell on Earth " and wouldn't you agree that Earth seems controlled by Satan rather than God? Think about it, if you were God and had all his powers, what kind of an Earth would this be if you were in control? If you are an honest person you would answer honestly. I say Hell on Earth because Satan is in control of this entire planet and it shows based on what you see. If you are rich then it may not have that big of an impact on you like it does me but even if you have all that money the one thing you will never escape is Death and for that my friend you will need God's help.
I say again that Satan is in control. Hell is indeed on Earth but it won't remain that way forever. I will end this post in having you look at Psalm chapter 37 verse 9 through 11 where it takes that the meek ones will possess the earth. That day is coming. Above I stated that Satan has a short period of time left and in Psalm the meek ones will possess the Earth. Interesting isn't it
Look out for Movie Weekend Every Saturday and Sunday!!!
Comments, suggestions, you know the email!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Have a great weekend!!!
Yes I know there are evil people in this world but, look at it from this point of view. No matter how bad your son or daughter is, you wouldn't want them to burn forever would you? No parent would want that for their children. Likewise, God who is our parent wouldn't want that for us as well. I just can't believe it. Not to mention that in the book of Jeremiah 7:31 it mentions that those were burning their sons and daughters in the fire, God says that he did not command that and that it did not come into his heart. Look it up! So if it didn't come into his heart back then, why would he create such a place for people to burn forever. Look at Jeremiah 19:5 where it states the same thing. 2nd Kings 23:10 says the same thing.
What's being taught is that when the human body dies, the human soul does not die but survives, although we cannot see it with our Natural eyes. Since it leaves the body it must go somewhere, maybe the spirit world, maybe Heaven but bad souls go to hell. Heaven is a place of everlasting happiness vs hell is the opposite of heaven. Since they claim that their teaching is what the Bible says hell is, we are obliged to go directly to the bible itself to find out exactly what the bible says hell is. We must go according to what the bible says hell is, not to what others say it is. People have a way of twisting what the bible says. The difference between what I'm saying and what they are saying is I'm telling you to research yourself. In the 7th creative days, (not literal) days it took to create the heavens and earth, you don't find anything that says Hell was created.
When I say the 7 creative days - I mean that God didn't create the world in just 7 days. We are still in that 7th creative day. The way God views a day or time itself is different than how we view a day or time itself. Anyway, back to the subject at hand. Think of this point as well. When God mentioned to Adam and Eve that if they ate of the fruit, he didn't tell them they would burn forever did he? Wouldn't you think that their disobedience that effects you and I today would justify them being the first to go too hell? He didn't say that to Adam or Eve. He told them that Death would be their sentence not a place to burn forever. The Story of Cain and Abel. Cain killed his brother Abel. God didn't tell Cain that Abel was up here with me, he said that your brother's blood is crying out to me from the ground. God didn't mention to Cain that now he will burn forever and this was the first death.
On Earth, did Jesus teach that there is literal fire in hell? No he did not. Hell is a place where all of us are going. Hell is nothing more than our grave. Another word for hell is Hades or Sheol. So again Hell is nothing more than our Graves. Think of this, if Death is a means to get to Heaven or Hell why would God do away with Death if that's our only ticket to get into Heaven? Look at Revelation 21:4. It states that in the future Death will be no more. In order to understand what he means you have to understand exactly why Jesus needed to come to earth in the first place. OH Jesus came here to save us? If you say that, then yes you are correct. He had to die for us in order to balance what Adam and Eve Lost. I'll discuss that later but think about it if our means of getting to Heaven through Death is destroyed then how do we get into Heaven after God does away with death? Simple answer - we don't go to Heaven. As for hell, Look at Revelation 12:7 through 12. Notice the End of that scripture it takes that Satan knows he has a short period of time left.
So if hell is a place for people to burn forever, why would Satan have a short time left? Also think of this, in those same verses 7 through 12 it states that Satan was hurled down to the earth. Keep in mind that Satan was an Angel in the beginning. He was hurled down to the earth, him and his demons. The scriptures does not state that hell was then created and he was hurled down then. It states that he was hurled down to where? The Entire Inhabited Earth!!! and what was he doing? Misleading the Entire inhabited Earth. Thus the reason why I state in the beginning of this post " Hell on Earth " and wouldn't you agree that Earth seems controlled by Satan rather than God? Think about it, if you were God and had all his powers, what kind of an Earth would this be if you were in control? If you are an honest person you would answer honestly. I say Hell on Earth because Satan is in control of this entire planet and it shows based on what you see. If you are rich then it may not have that big of an impact on you like it does me but even if you have all that money the one thing you will never escape is Death and for that my friend you will need God's help.
I say again that Satan is in control. Hell is indeed on Earth but it won't remain that way forever. I will end this post in having you look at Psalm chapter 37 verse 9 through 11 where it takes that the meek ones will possess the earth. That day is coming. Above I stated that Satan has a short period of time left and in Psalm the meek ones will possess the Earth. Interesting isn't it
Look out for Movie Weekend Every Saturday and Sunday!!!
Comments, suggestions, you know the email!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Have a great weekend!!!
Thursday, August 7, 2008
My Thoughts for today
I remember when I was younger that a cop whispered in my ear telling me that he should take me to the beach and kick my behind. Not all cops are bad, just the ones that arrested me. LOL
This makes me upset though. Has any police officer treated you with dis-respect? Let me know....
DYCERULZ@Gmail.com....
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
Imagine this - You launch firefox or Explorer. You type in your favorite website only to find that the page isn't there anymore. You wonder what the hell is going on. You try and log onto your favorite games only to find that you cannot connect. Amazing revelations have emerged concerning already existing government plans to overhaul the way the internet functions in order to apply much greater restrictions and control over the web.
Lawrence Lessig, a respected Law Professor from Stanford University told an audience at this years Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference in Half Moon Bay, California, that “There’s going to be an i-9/11 event” which will act as a catalyst for a radical reworking of the law pertaining to the internet.Lessig also revealed that he had learned, during a dinner with former government Counter Terrorism Czar Richard Clarke, that there is already in existence a cyber equivalent of the Patriot Act, an “i-Patriot Act” if you will, and that the Justice Department is waiting for a cyber terrorism event in order to implement its provisions.
I guess I wouldn't go so far as to say that every site you go to will go down or the on-line games you play but there will be restrictions to which sites we can access. Very interesting. Finally I watched this on youtube yesterday and I was amazed but not shocked on what was going on. It was also reported by the news. That's the part that amazed me.
I've been saying for years that the Government uses humans to test their latest weapons in terms of a vaccine. This video doesn't prove anything that I already didn't know and if you are one of those that think they wouldn't do it. I posted on another forum de-classified documents showing it was done. I've spoken to those who served in Vietnam who told me that they were sprayed on by planes by our own Military. Do the research before you call me a liar and our own Government says so then I guess you are calling them a liar as well. Till tomorrow - DYCE...
Lawrence Lessig, a respected Law Professor from Stanford University told an audience at this years Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference in Half Moon Bay, California, that “There’s going to be an i-9/11 event” which will act as a catalyst for a radical reworking of the law pertaining to the internet.Lessig also revealed that he had learned, during a dinner with former government Counter Terrorism Czar Richard Clarke, that there is already in existence a cyber equivalent of the Patriot Act, an “i-Patriot Act” if you will, and that the Justice Department is waiting for a cyber terrorism event in order to implement its provisions.
I guess I wouldn't go so far as to say that every site you go to will go down or the on-line games you play but there will be restrictions to which sites we can access. Very interesting. Finally I watched this on youtube yesterday and I was amazed but not shocked on what was going on. It was also reported by the news. That's the part that amazed me.
I've been saying for years that the Government uses humans to test their latest weapons in terms of a vaccine. This video doesn't prove anything that I already didn't know and if you are one of those that think they wouldn't do it. I posted on another forum de-classified documents showing it was done. I've spoken to those who served in Vietnam who told me that they were sprayed on by planes by our own Military. Do the research before you call me a liar and our own Government says so then I guess you are calling them a liar as well. Till tomorrow - DYCE...
Tuesday, August 5, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
Sometime Ago I mentioned that in the future there was humans were to be chipped. You might say " What do you mean to be chipped " Well, a company called Verichip makes implantable micochips that would go under the skin. It's the Governments way of tracking everyone. You might say " No I wouldn't agree to this "
Real ID is something they are pushing on you now. If you are not sure what Real ID is, I suggest you do some homework. I suggest that you check out a DMV site. Without Real ID you cannot enter a federal building or even get on a plane. There are some good idea's with being chipped. I can think of two examples. One would be if you lost your child. Chipping will allow law enforcement to track your child and I hope find your child alive. Chipping will also allow those in the medical field to know your medical history.
Another way is to store all your financial information on this chip so you can pay for items without cash. Matter of fact cash is going away if you haven't noticed. It started with credit cards, then debit cards, and then in the future the chip. The future will indeed be interesting. Then I read that hackers found a way to hack the chip but that didn't stop them from moving forward. Then they found out that the chip was causing issues with medical equipment but that didn't stop them from moving forward. Then in a recently released article it was proven that the chips cause cancer. Did that stop them? For now it has and I say for now because really even if it's bad for you they will say it's good. The elite does not care about you. They want to control you. They want to kill you. Check this video out
They want to kill you.
Real ID is something they are pushing on you now. If you are not sure what Real ID is, I suggest you do some homework. I suggest that you check out a DMV site. Without Real ID you cannot enter a federal building or even get on a plane. There are some good idea's with being chipped. I can think of two examples. One would be if you lost your child. Chipping will allow law enforcement to track your child and I hope find your child alive. Chipping will also allow those in the medical field to know your medical history.
Another way is to store all your financial information on this chip so you can pay for items without cash. Matter of fact cash is going away if you haven't noticed. It started with credit cards, then debit cards, and then in the future the chip. The future will indeed be interesting. Then I read that hackers found a way to hack the chip but that didn't stop them from moving forward. Then they found out that the chip was causing issues with medical equipment but that didn't stop them from moving forward. Then in a recently released article it was proven that the chips cause cancer. Did that stop them? For now it has and I say for now because really even if it's bad for you they will say it's good. The elite does not care about you. They want to control you. They want to kill you. Check this video out
They want to kill you.
Monday, August 4, 2008
What's Fluoride’s Impact On The Brain?
New science indicating fluoride’s dangers to the brain and other organs will be presented by prominent fluoride research scientists during back-to-back conferences of the International Society for Fluoride Research (ISFR) and the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) in Toronto August 7-11, 2008.
Fluoride, added to water supplies to prevent tooth decay, is also in virtually all non-organic foods and beverages. Fluoride’s brain effects were never examined prior to water fluoridation.
Recently, because of health concerns, Health Canada recommended that fluoride levels be lowered in Canadian water supplies (0.7 mg/L) , children’s toothpaste and infant formula but claims that “the weight of evidence does not support a link between fluoride and intelligence quotient deficit.”
“It is hard to believe that any “weight of evidence” analysis could possibly dismiss fluoride’s neurological impacts. There have now been over 40 animal studies which show that fluoride can damage the brain, and no less than 18 studies which show that fluoride lowers IQ in children, and only 2 that don’t. I look forward to reading the full report when it is made available,” says Paul Connett, PhD, FAN Executive Director.
According to ISFR conference organizer, Dr. Hardy Limeback, “Our conference features experts who researched the dangers that fluoride poses to human health. Our keynote speaker, Dr. A.K. Susheela, (Executive Director, Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation, India) probably knows more about fluoride’s toxic effects to the body than any other living scientist. It is important that officials who promote water fluoridation hear what she and others have to say,” says Limeback.
Susheela can also explain to Medical Doctors, often untrained in fluoride toxicology, how to diagnose, treat and reverse early symptoms of fluoride toxicity which mimic arthritis and irritable bowel syndrome.
The latest issue of ISFR’s journal, Fluoride, published 12 newly-translated Chinese studies, which report fluoride’s effects on the brain, including the lowering of IQ in children. These and other brain studies will be reviewed at both conferences.
Coupled with these conferences, the Toronto-based Citizens for a Safe Environment (CSE) will host two public meetings with FAN in downtown Toronto on Monday August 11.
According to CSE director Karen Buck, “These meetings will give the public information they don’t get from our government or dental organizations. In the afternoon, a panel will address the question of whether Toronto should stop fluoridating its water. In the evening experts will explain fluoride’s dangers to health.”
After receiving an invitation to attend these meetings, the Ontario Dental Association sent out a news release urging legislators and communities to stand up in support of fluoridation; but they won’t do so, themselves.
“The best way that the ODA can get communities and politicians to stand up for water fluoridation is to provide, in person, a cogent and scientifically-referenced defense of fluoridation at the afternoon forum,” says CSE President Karen Buck.
At all three events, Dr. Vyvyan Howard, an infant and fetal pathologist, and president of the International Society of Doctors for the Environment, will be presenting a major review of studies on fluoride’s brain effects, including the translated Chinese studies.
“The best way to lower children’s fluoride intake, as Health Canada suggests, is to stop fluoridation,” says Connett. “It makes no sense to prescribe fluoride drugs to children via the water supply at levels which are between 150 and 250 times higher than the level in mothers’ milk.”
Based on sound evidence it makes you wonder why they continue to add it to our water? There are things you can do. You can purchase toothpaste that does not contain fluoride. You can purchase water that does not contain fluoride. Watch this video
Fluoride, added to water supplies to prevent tooth decay, is also in virtually all non-organic foods and beverages. Fluoride’s brain effects were never examined prior to water fluoridation.
Recently, because of health concerns, Health Canada recommended that fluoride levels be lowered in Canadian water supplies (0.7 mg/L) , children’s toothpaste and infant formula but claims that “the weight of evidence does not support a link between fluoride and intelligence quotient deficit.”
“It is hard to believe that any “weight of evidence” analysis could possibly dismiss fluoride’s neurological impacts. There have now been over 40 animal studies which show that fluoride can damage the brain, and no less than 18 studies which show that fluoride lowers IQ in children, and only 2 that don’t. I look forward to reading the full report when it is made available,” says Paul Connett, PhD, FAN Executive Director.
According to ISFR conference organizer, Dr. Hardy Limeback, “Our conference features experts who researched the dangers that fluoride poses to human health. Our keynote speaker, Dr. A.K. Susheela, (Executive Director, Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation, India) probably knows more about fluoride’s toxic effects to the body than any other living scientist. It is important that officials who promote water fluoridation hear what she and others have to say,” says Limeback.
Susheela can also explain to Medical Doctors, often untrained in fluoride toxicology, how to diagnose, treat and reverse early symptoms of fluoride toxicity which mimic arthritis and irritable bowel syndrome.
The latest issue of ISFR’s journal, Fluoride, published 12 newly-translated Chinese studies, which report fluoride’s effects on the brain, including the lowering of IQ in children. These and other brain studies will be reviewed at both conferences.
Coupled with these conferences, the Toronto-based Citizens for a Safe Environment (CSE) will host two public meetings with FAN in downtown Toronto on Monday August 11.
According to CSE director Karen Buck, “These meetings will give the public information they don’t get from our government or dental organizations. In the afternoon, a panel will address the question of whether Toronto should stop fluoridating its water. In the evening experts will explain fluoride’s dangers to health.”
After receiving an invitation to attend these meetings, the Ontario Dental Association sent out a news release urging legislators and communities to stand up in support of fluoridation; but they won’t do so, themselves.
“The best way that the ODA can get communities and politicians to stand up for water fluoridation is to provide, in person, a cogent and scientifically-referenced defense of fluoridation at the afternoon forum,” says CSE President Karen Buck.
At all three events, Dr. Vyvyan Howard, an infant and fetal pathologist, and president of the International Society of Doctors for the Environment, will be presenting a major review of studies on fluoride’s brain effects, including the translated Chinese studies.
“The best way to lower children’s fluoride intake, as Health Canada suggests, is to stop fluoridation,” says Connett. “It makes no sense to prescribe fluoride drugs to children via the water supply at levels which are between 150 and 250 times higher than the level in mothers’ milk.”
Based on sound evidence it makes you wonder why they continue to add it to our water? There are things you can do. You can purchase toothpaste that does not contain fluoride. You can purchase water that does not contain fluoride. Watch this video
Sunday, August 3, 2008
Saturday, August 2, 2008
Friday, August 1, 2008
My Thoughts for Today
Sorry for the delay. I posted a video to delay what I was going to talk about which is rape or suicide. In each case I'm going to walk you through each story and you tell me if you think it's rape or suicide? Does a woman who kills herself kick her own teeth in before she kills herself? Rape or Suicide?
Would this woman break her nose before killing herself? Rape or Suicide? If this same woman had abrasions all over her body, burns on her hands, loose teeth, acid burns on her genitals, and a bullet hole on the left side of her head even though she is right handed, Rape or Suicide? What would you say and be honest. Do you think this woman was raped? If you say no she did all of this to herself then please stop reading because there is nothing anyone can say to convince you that this woman was raped.
Who was she? She was Army Private First Class LaVena Johnson. Johnson was found dead in Balad, Iraq, just a few weeks short of her twentieth birthday.Her body was found in a tent belonging to the private military contractor Kellogg Brown & Root. The Army labeled LaVena Johnson’s death a suicide. They told her parents she died of “self-inflicted, non-combat injuries.” But her parents never believed that story. They think she was raped and murdered and that the Army’s investigators ignored physical evidence that would have proved this. Check this video for information:
This is a sick story. In the Beginning I mentioned rape or suicide well I guess you can add murder. Sadly this isn't the only case. What's wrong with people........................................
Would this woman break her nose before killing herself? Rape or Suicide? If this same woman had abrasions all over her body, burns on her hands, loose teeth, acid burns on her genitals, and a bullet hole on the left side of her head even though she is right handed, Rape or Suicide? What would you say and be honest. Do you think this woman was raped? If you say no she did all of this to herself then please stop reading because there is nothing anyone can say to convince you that this woman was raped.
Who was she? She was Army Private First Class LaVena Johnson. Johnson was found dead in Balad, Iraq, just a few weeks short of her twentieth birthday.Her body was found in a tent belonging to the private military contractor Kellogg Brown & Root. The Army labeled LaVena Johnson’s death a suicide. They told her parents she died of “self-inflicted, non-combat injuries.” But her parents never believed that story. They think she was raped and murdered and that the Army’s investigators ignored physical evidence that would have proved this. Check this video for information:
This is a sick story. In the Beginning I mentioned rape or suicide well I guess you can add murder. Sadly this isn't the only case. What's wrong with people........................................
My Thoughts For Today
Wrath released between Oct & December? I mentioned to Blmp that it will be released Nov 30th. Some of the new features are insane. Death Knights look insane. I may give it a shot. Right now I'm enjoying my time away from the game but love looking into whats going on. Like this and I love it
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)