Seems like all need a bailout in one way or another. It's interesting to note that the 700 Billion dollar Bailout is separate from what they have already gave out before. I wrote many things on the bailout. I mentioned that many things will happen between now and the year 2012. All of this is part of their plan for a one world government. 9/11 was the beginning even though this plan has been in motion for sometime.
Fidel Castro suggested Sunday that the U.S. government has promoted Americans' fears about al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups to justify its plans for world domination.
Castro has previously accused the U.S. government of misleading the public about the Sept. 11 attacks, and his close friend and ally Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez says it is plausible that Washington was somehow involved in planning the attacks.
The world has indeed changed since 9/11. Its interesting because many will look at this as if it's just another bad economy and that it's happened before. Think about all that I have posted.
1. Economy
2. Vaccinations
3. Water
4. Chemtrails
5. One World Government.
Speaking of water. What comes to mind when you think of arsenic? For most people, it conjures up a deadly poison used by killers in fictional mystery novels and some real-life murderers, too. But the danger of this toxic substance most often comes not from some evil-doer but simply from exposure to it through our environment, including the water we drink. Unwittingly taken into the body over many years, arsenic can result in lung, bladder and skin cancers, as well as heart disease, diabetes and neurological damage.
In the U.S., many locations are known to have groundwater containing arsenic concentrations in excess of the new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard of 10 parts per billion. But now comes research that suggests the EPA’s supposedly “safe” level of arsemic allowed in water supplies for public consumption isn’t safe at all. In fact, water laced with the federally-approved amount of arsenic could be causing high blood pressure and artery-clogging arhterosclerosis.
According to animal research by University of Pittsburgh scientists set to be published in the December issue of the Journal of Clinical Investigation, and available online now at http://www.jci.org/articles/view/35092, arsenic at EPA-approved levels for drinking water causes pores in liver blood vessels to close, potentially leading to cardiovascular disease and hypertension. This study calls into question whether present Environmental Protection Agency standards (currently based only on the risks of arsenic causing cancer) are stringent enough.
Isn't that interesting? Vaccinations, well I mentioned it time and time again. You get more information on what's in the food you buy at Safeway than you do in any vaccination given to you. All I ask is that they list what's in it and then you decide if you want it or not. This is what will happen. An outbreak will take place. They will tell everyone that they need to get vaccinated to protect themselves. They get the shot and all goes away but does it? No because that shot you just lost 10 years if not more on your life because of that shot! Can happen...Has happened....
Chemtrails: The fact that congress discussed it makes it real. It does happen and is happening now.
It indeed is a scary time to live. I know with this topic I'm all over the place but I have tons on my mind. Be safe...
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Monday, November 24, 2008
Here Chip me!!!
I was reading this article that talked about inserting a microchip into Aids patients. Here is the article: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/11/24/asia/AS-Indonesia-AIDS-Tagging.php.
What I found interesting about the article is the fact that here in the United States they have the same plan for our future. The Government wants to chip each and every American. When they found out that it could cause tumors, back to the drawing board I call it. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20643620/
There are some good idea's about chipping but there are also bad ideas as well. An example of a good idea is what's mentioned in the above link which talks about someone with a medical condition who cannot speak. If scanned they may save his life because his medical information is stored on this chip. Sometimes a few seconds can save your life.
Another reason to be chipped would be to find your children. Let's say someone takes your child. The police can track your child and find him or her before anything happens or at least find your child if something does happen.
So medical, financial, tracking, and all other information about you will be in this chip and please don't sit there and tell me that the FDA approved it which I know they did and I can care less if they did. FDA approves many things that are bad for people.
It's already been proven that the chip can be hacked but yet they say it's safe. Folks it's not safe. What do you think? Would you want to be chipped?
What I found interesting about the article is the fact that here in the United States they have the same plan for our future. The Government wants to chip each and every American. When they found out that it could cause tumors, back to the drawing board I call it. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20643620/
There are some good idea's about chipping but there are also bad ideas as well. An example of a good idea is what's mentioned in the above link which talks about someone with a medical condition who cannot speak. If scanned they may save his life because his medical information is stored on this chip. Sometimes a few seconds can save your life.
Another reason to be chipped would be to find your children. Let's say someone takes your child. The police can track your child and find him or her before anything happens or at least find your child if something does happen.
So medical, financial, tracking, and all other information about you will be in this chip and please don't sit there and tell me that the FDA approved it which I know they did and I can care less if they did. FDA approves many things that are bad for people.
It's already been proven that the chip can be hacked but yet they say it's safe. Folks it's not safe. What do you think? Would you want to be chipped?
Friday, November 21, 2008
In case you didn't know.
What do rat poison and the HPV vaccine have in common? The answer is a hazardous chemical known as sodium borate. Savvy readers may wonder what a toxin that is commonly used to kill rats is doing in the ingredient list for the HPV vaccine that is currently being pushed on girls as young as nine and is even being considered for men and boys. Unfortunately, the answer isn’t very comforting, especially for new U.S. residents for whom the HPV injection containing sodium borate is now mandated.
What is Sodium Borate?
Sodium borate, a boric acid salt also known as borax, has many common uses. In addition to its use as a rat poison, it is also used in laundry detergents, cosmetics, enamel glazes, flame retardants, and buffer solutions in chemistry. However, sodium borate also has antifungal properties, which means that its probable reason for being in the vaccine is to act as a preservative.
Sodium Borate Banned as Food Additive
Sodium borate is used as a food additive in some countries, but it is now outlawed in many places. For example, one Australian government recall site notes: “Product is Borax (sodium borate) which is a non permitted food additive and is harmful to health.” So, if it’s “harmful to health,” why is it being added to the HPV vaccine?
No Longer Used in Medical Preparations
The U.S. National Library of Medicine states in an article that boric acid is “no longer commonly used in medical preparations.” It’s a good thing, too, considering that the U.S. National Library of Medicine also reports that this substance used to be used to disinfect and treat wounds and that individuals “who received such treatment over and over again got sick, and some died.” In fact, the U.S. National Library of Medicine provides the number for Poison Control for people exposed to this chemical and notes that treatment for those exposed to it may include gastric lavage (stomach pumping), dialysis, and liquids by mouth or IV.
Sodium Borate Poisoning Symptoms Mimic Reactions to HPV Vaccine
Sadly, the information about sodium borate gets even scarier. Another government website article states that exposure to sodium borate can cause convulsions and other ill health effects. Interestingly enough, young girls who receive the HPV vaccine have reported similar symptoms to those that appear in cases of sodium borate poisoning. This particular government site provides the following warning regarding this chemical: “WARNING! HARMFUL IF SWALLOWED, INHALED OR ABSORBED THROUGH SKIN. CAUSES IRRITATION TO SKIN, EYES AND RESPIRATORY TRACT.” Given this information, is sodium borate really something that should be injected into humans? This is something the reader should carefully consider, along with the previously reported information, before choosing to receive the controversial HPV vaccine.
I know a few who have received the HPV vaccine and have had side effects. This past week the Wall Street Journal ran an article on a man getting Alzheimer’s in his 40s, one of 500,000 Americans with early onset. The notion that this problem is striking ever earlier sent shock waves through the country and left people wondering why this is happening.
There are many inflammatory factors in a person’s life and gene-related weaknesses are involved. However, theoretical data on the inflammatory nature of vaccines, especially in the large numbers given to children at an early age while their nerves are developing response patterns for future life, means that they cannot be ruled out as one main factor that primes the Alzheimer’s pump.
On the other hand the Canadian researchers found in another article I read that the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, wine consumption, coffee consumption, and regular physical activity were associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease. There are many great anti-inflammatory nutrients that readily replace the concept of drug use, including the grape seed extracts of red wine (which have been shown to reduce Alzheimer’s plaque formation).
Natural vitamin E at the dose of 2000 IU per day has been shown to extend the life of Alzheimer’s patients by two years. DHA and folic acid have been shown to be protective against Alzheimer’s. Moderate coffee intake has a brain-activating effect, which would be synergistic with learning or other forms of constructive brain exercise that help keep your brain cells fit. Physical exercise is proven to elevate levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) vital for your brain to withstand stress and inflammation and keep your brain cells living longer in a healthier condition. The common theme is that using your brain constructively helps keep it fit and factors that induce brain inflammation, of which there are many, send you in the wrong direction.
Besides the above, obvious factors that cause brain inflammation include a lack of sleep, emotional stress, physical exhaustion, cell phone use, and a poor quality diet. This means that there will never be a specific cause of Alzheimer’s identified, other than the idea that too much inflammation combined with genetic weaknesses will lead to the problem. Too much inflammation is the common theme behind all nerve-related diseases, heart disease, and cancer. Thus, the manifestation of various shades of cognitive decline will be common in the overall population and progression into full Alzheimer’s, compared to some other serious problem, will depend on genetic weak spots.
For example, healthy children of Alzheimer’s patients have adverse changes in their brain structure before any symptoms appear. The greater the amount of inflammation, combined with an individual’s ability to tolerate inflammation, will determine the age of onset.
Recently researchers did autopsies on the brains of individuals who maintained sharp memory into their 80s. Those with sharp memory compared to the brains of those with “normal aging” had far less brain tangles. Thus we see a sliding scale of tangles, going from virtually none in true health, to the common averages of “normal aging,” down into the diseased ranges of cognitive decline, and eventually into Alzheimer’s. With this understanding, “normal aging” can be seen as abnormal from an optimal health point of view. Such brain tangles are driven by inflammatory processes.
The adjuvants used in vaccines (putting the mercury issue aside) are intentionally highly inflammatory so as to provoke a more active immune response to the weakened pathogen. The fact that American children are the most vaccinated in the world at such an early age, when their brains are setting up shop, runs the high risk that vaccinations will “train” nerves to become more hyper-active to future inflammatory stress of any kind.
Such issues would be magnified if a child had a history of stress in the womb, stress as an infant (unstable environment), poor nutrition in the womb or early life, other health problems as an infant, or has family-related gene weaknesses predisposing to Alzheimer’s (or any other nerve-related disease for that matter). These massive numbers of early vaccinations could easily set the stage for early onset Alzheimer’s. At this point there is absolutely no science that refutes this theory, and plenty of science to predict it.
Our government, bless their little hearts, has no interest in proving this not to be the case or in figuring out a safety threshold for the number of vaccines or the age they are given. Rather, they operate on the assumption that any number of vaccines is harmless. This public health mentality of “fire a shot gun and ask questions later” (or never ask any questions at all) is good for herd mentality and not so good for personalized wellness and quality of life.
Any notion that the treatment is problematic, such as a contributor to autism, is met with flat out denial. It does not matter to them what data is presented or what new science obviously predicts. Our government’s illness is their bizarre concept of control at all costs by unelected bureaucrats, risks be dammed. The bottom line, our government doesn’t actually care what adverse effects vaccinations may cause to your child, they are treating a herd.
Thus, the question of the immunization link to Alzheimer’s is an open-ended and controversial issue. A responsible government would have demanded animal studies with different levels of immunizations at different ages in relation to the onset of Alzheimer’s. These studies aren’t being conducted because OUR GOVERNMENT DOES NOT WANT TO KNOW THE ANSWER.
Stopping Problems Early
Regardless of factors that set the stage for Alzheimer’s it is quite clear that an overall strategy that balances your inflammation checkbook is central to preventing the problem. On one side of the equation is the wear and tear in your life. On the other side are the healthy things you do to rejuvenate and recover. No matter what you believe in, you’d better figure out a way to balance this checkbook.
We definitely know that it takes many years of wear and tear for full blown Alzheimer’s to manifest. It is vital to act aggressively to prevent the problem if you are sliding down the Alzheimer’s slope. Managing inflammatory stressors is at the top of your list. It is easiest to make changes in your brain before the problem gets large. Various memory glitches are normal and others are not. The Alzheimer’s Association does have a list of the ten warning signs that is helpful:
1. Memory loss. Forgetting recently learned information is one of the most common early signs of dementia. A person begins to forget more often and is unable to recall the information later. What’s normal? Forgetting names or appointments occasionally.
2. Difficulty performing familiar tasks. People with dementia often find it hard to plan or complete everyday tasks. Individuals may lose track of the steps involved in preparing a meal, placing a telephone call or playing a game. What’s normal? Occasionally forgetting why you came into a room or what you planned to say.
3. Problems with language. People with Alzheimer’s disease often forget simple words or substitute unusual words, making their speech or writing hard to understand. They may be unable to find the toothbrush, for example, and instead ask for “that thing for my mouth.” What’s normal? Sometimes having trouble finding the right word.
4. Disorientation to time and place. People with Alzheimer’s disease can become lost in their own neighborhood, forget where they are and how they got there, and not know how to get back home. What’s normal? Forgetting the day of the week or where you were going.
5. Poor or decreased judgment. Those with Alzheimer’s may dress inappropriately, wearing several layers on a warm day or little clothing in the cold. They may show poor judgment, like giving away large sums of money to telemarketers. What’s normal? Making a questionable or debatable decision from time to time.
6. Problems with abstract thinking. Someone with Alzheimer’s disease may have unusual difficulty performing complex mental tasks, like forgetting what numbers are for and how they should be used. What’s normal? Finding it challenging to balance a checkbook.
7. Misplacing things. A person with Alzheimer’s disease may put things in unusual places: an iron in the freezer or a wristwatch in the sugar bowl. What’s normal? Misplacing keys or a wallet temporarily.
8. Changes in mood or behavior. Someone with Alzheimer’s disease may show rapid mood swings – from calm to tears to anger – for no apparent reason. What’s normal? Occasionally feeling sad or moody.
9. Changes in personality. The personalities of people with dementia can change dramatically. They may become extremely confused, suspicious, fearful or dependent on a family member. What’s normal? People’s personalities do change somewhat with age.
10. Loss of initiative. A person with Alzheimer’s disease may become very passive, sitting in front of the TV for hours, sleeping more than usual or not wanting to do usual activities. What’s normal? Sometimes feeling weary of work or social obligations.
Since Alzheimer's runs in my family it's good to know that there is a possibility that maybe it doesn't run in my family but that they caused it to run in my family. Think about that for a second the next time you get a shot.....
What is Sodium Borate?
Sodium borate, a boric acid salt also known as borax, has many common uses. In addition to its use as a rat poison, it is also used in laundry detergents, cosmetics, enamel glazes, flame retardants, and buffer solutions in chemistry. However, sodium borate also has antifungal properties, which means that its probable reason for being in the vaccine is to act as a preservative.
Sodium Borate Banned as Food Additive
Sodium borate is used as a food additive in some countries, but it is now outlawed in many places. For example, one Australian government recall site notes: “Product is Borax (sodium borate) which is a non permitted food additive and is harmful to health.” So, if it’s “harmful to health,” why is it being added to the HPV vaccine?
No Longer Used in Medical Preparations
The U.S. National Library of Medicine states in an article that boric acid is “no longer commonly used in medical preparations.” It’s a good thing, too, considering that the U.S. National Library of Medicine also reports that this substance used to be used to disinfect and treat wounds and that individuals “who received such treatment over and over again got sick, and some died.” In fact, the U.S. National Library of Medicine provides the number for Poison Control for people exposed to this chemical and notes that treatment for those exposed to it may include gastric lavage (stomach pumping), dialysis, and liquids by mouth or IV.
Sodium Borate Poisoning Symptoms Mimic Reactions to HPV Vaccine
Sadly, the information about sodium borate gets even scarier. Another government website article states that exposure to sodium borate can cause convulsions and other ill health effects. Interestingly enough, young girls who receive the HPV vaccine have reported similar symptoms to those that appear in cases of sodium borate poisoning. This particular government site provides the following warning regarding this chemical: “WARNING! HARMFUL IF SWALLOWED, INHALED OR ABSORBED THROUGH SKIN. CAUSES IRRITATION TO SKIN, EYES AND RESPIRATORY TRACT.” Given this information, is sodium borate really something that should be injected into humans? This is something the reader should carefully consider, along with the previously reported information, before choosing to receive the controversial HPV vaccine.
I know a few who have received the HPV vaccine and have had side effects. This past week the Wall Street Journal ran an article on a man getting Alzheimer’s in his 40s, one of 500,000 Americans with early onset. The notion that this problem is striking ever earlier sent shock waves through the country and left people wondering why this is happening.
There are many inflammatory factors in a person’s life and gene-related weaknesses are involved. However, theoretical data on the inflammatory nature of vaccines, especially in the large numbers given to children at an early age while their nerves are developing response patterns for future life, means that they cannot be ruled out as one main factor that primes the Alzheimer’s pump.
On the other hand the Canadian researchers found in another article I read that the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, wine consumption, coffee consumption, and regular physical activity were associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease. There are many great anti-inflammatory nutrients that readily replace the concept of drug use, including the grape seed extracts of red wine (which have been shown to reduce Alzheimer’s plaque formation).
Natural vitamin E at the dose of 2000 IU per day has been shown to extend the life of Alzheimer’s patients by two years. DHA and folic acid have been shown to be protective against Alzheimer’s. Moderate coffee intake has a brain-activating effect, which would be synergistic with learning or other forms of constructive brain exercise that help keep your brain cells fit. Physical exercise is proven to elevate levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) vital for your brain to withstand stress and inflammation and keep your brain cells living longer in a healthier condition. The common theme is that using your brain constructively helps keep it fit and factors that induce brain inflammation, of which there are many, send you in the wrong direction.
Besides the above, obvious factors that cause brain inflammation include a lack of sleep, emotional stress, physical exhaustion, cell phone use, and a poor quality diet. This means that there will never be a specific cause of Alzheimer’s identified, other than the idea that too much inflammation combined with genetic weaknesses will lead to the problem. Too much inflammation is the common theme behind all nerve-related diseases, heart disease, and cancer. Thus, the manifestation of various shades of cognitive decline will be common in the overall population and progression into full Alzheimer’s, compared to some other serious problem, will depend on genetic weak spots.
For example, healthy children of Alzheimer’s patients have adverse changes in their brain structure before any symptoms appear. The greater the amount of inflammation, combined with an individual’s ability to tolerate inflammation, will determine the age of onset.
Recently researchers did autopsies on the brains of individuals who maintained sharp memory into their 80s. Those with sharp memory compared to the brains of those with “normal aging” had far less brain tangles. Thus we see a sliding scale of tangles, going from virtually none in true health, to the common averages of “normal aging,” down into the diseased ranges of cognitive decline, and eventually into Alzheimer’s. With this understanding, “normal aging” can be seen as abnormal from an optimal health point of view. Such brain tangles are driven by inflammatory processes.
The adjuvants used in vaccines (putting the mercury issue aside) are intentionally highly inflammatory so as to provoke a more active immune response to the weakened pathogen. The fact that American children are the most vaccinated in the world at such an early age, when their brains are setting up shop, runs the high risk that vaccinations will “train” nerves to become more hyper-active to future inflammatory stress of any kind.
Such issues would be magnified if a child had a history of stress in the womb, stress as an infant (unstable environment), poor nutrition in the womb or early life, other health problems as an infant, or has family-related gene weaknesses predisposing to Alzheimer’s (or any other nerve-related disease for that matter). These massive numbers of early vaccinations could easily set the stage for early onset Alzheimer’s. At this point there is absolutely no science that refutes this theory, and plenty of science to predict it.
Our government, bless their little hearts, has no interest in proving this not to be the case or in figuring out a safety threshold for the number of vaccines or the age they are given. Rather, they operate on the assumption that any number of vaccines is harmless. This public health mentality of “fire a shot gun and ask questions later” (or never ask any questions at all) is good for herd mentality and not so good for personalized wellness and quality of life.
Any notion that the treatment is problematic, such as a contributor to autism, is met with flat out denial. It does not matter to them what data is presented or what new science obviously predicts. Our government’s illness is their bizarre concept of control at all costs by unelected bureaucrats, risks be dammed. The bottom line, our government doesn’t actually care what adverse effects vaccinations may cause to your child, they are treating a herd.
Thus, the question of the immunization link to Alzheimer’s is an open-ended and controversial issue. A responsible government would have demanded animal studies with different levels of immunizations at different ages in relation to the onset of Alzheimer’s. These studies aren’t being conducted because OUR GOVERNMENT DOES NOT WANT TO KNOW THE ANSWER.
Stopping Problems Early
Regardless of factors that set the stage for Alzheimer’s it is quite clear that an overall strategy that balances your inflammation checkbook is central to preventing the problem. On one side of the equation is the wear and tear in your life. On the other side are the healthy things you do to rejuvenate and recover. No matter what you believe in, you’d better figure out a way to balance this checkbook.
We definitely know that it takes many years of wear and tear for full blown Alzheimer’s to manifest. It is vital to act aggressively to prevent the problem if you are sliding down the Alzheimer’s slope. Managing inflammatory stressors is at the top of your list. It is easiest to make changes in your brain before the problem gets large. Various memory glitches are normal and others are not. The Alzheimer’s Association does have a list of the ten warning signs that is helpful:
1. Memory loss. Forgetting recently learned information is one of the most common early signs of dementia. A person begins to forget more often and is unable to recall the information later. What’s normal? Forgetting names or appointments occasionally.
2. Difficulty performing familiar tasks. People with dementia often find it hard to plan or complete everyday tasks. Individuals may lose track of the steps involved in preparing a meal, placing a telephone call or playing a game. What’s normal? Occasionally forgetting why you came into a room or what you planned to say.
3. Problems with language. People with Alzheimer’s disease often forget simple words or substitute unusual words, making their speech or writing hard to understand. They may be unable to find the toothbrush, for example, and instead ask for “that thing for my mouth.” What’s normal? Sometimes having trouble finding the right word.
4. Disorientation to time and place. People with Alzheimer’s disease can become lost in their own neighborhood, forget where they are and how they got there, and not know how to get back home. What’s normal? Forgetting the day of the week or where you were going.
5. Poor or decreased judgment. Those with Alzheimer’s may dress inappropriately, wearing several layers on a warm day or little clothing in the cold. They may show poor judgment, like giving away large sums of money to telemarketers. What’s normal? Making a questionable or debatable decision from time to time.
6. Problems with abstract thinking. Someone with Alzheimer’s disease may have unusual difficulty performing complex mental tasks, like forgetting what numbers are for and how they should be used. What’s normal? Finding it challenging to balance a checkbook.
7. Misplacing things. A person with Alzheimer’s disease may put things in unusual places: an iron in the freezer or a wristwatch in the sugar bowl. What’s normal? Misplacing keys or a wallet temporarily.
8. Changes in mood or behavior. Someone with Alzheimer’s disease may show rapid mood swings – from calm to tears to anger – for no apparent reason. What’s normal? Occasionally feeling sad or moody.
9. Changes in personality. The personalities of people with dementia can change dramatically. They may become extremely confused, suspicious, fearful or dependent on a family member. What’s normal? People’s personalities do change somewhat with age.
10. Loss of initiative. A person with Alzheimer’s disease may become very passive, sitting in front of the TV for hours, sleeping more than usual or not wanting to do usual activities. What’s normal? Sometimes feeling weary of work or social obligations.
Since Alzheimer's runs in my family it's good to know that there is a possibility that maybe it doesn't run in my family but that they caused it to run in my family. Think about that for a second the next time you get a shot.....
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Amazing...
In 2006, attorney Rob V. Robertson drafted a “Children’s Bill of Rights” for the Travis County Domestic Relations Office, in Austin, Texas. Ostensibly designed to protect the children of divorced parents, the Children’s Bill of Rights is a prime example of government micromanagement of the affairs of parents.
“Marriage is a contract between adults, and when it ends, the matter is between the adults also,” writes Robertson. “Yet no parental action has a greater impact on children. Children love their parents and want to be with them. Even in times of great stress, parents have a responsibility to conduct their legal affairs in a manner that will protect their children from adult conflicts.”
However, the bill transcends the realm of legal affairs and mandates how adults will conduct themselves in relation to their own children, including the displaying photographs, making phone calls, and sending and receiving correspondence and greeting cards.
Bureaucrats in Travis County have forcibly inserted the state into all manner of private minutiae, once the province of families but now apparently the business of government. The list is exhaustive:
1. Neither parent shall deny the child reasonable use of the telephone to place and receive calls with the other parent and relatives.
2. Neither parent shall speak or write derogatory remarks about the other parent to the child, or engage in abusive, coarse or foul language, which can be overheard by the child whether or not the language involves the other parent.
3. Neither parent shall permit the children to overhear arguments, negotiations or other substantive discussions about legal or business dealings between the parents.
4. Neither parent shall physically or psychologically attempt to pressure, attempt to influence, pressure or influence the children concerning the personal opinion or position of the child concerning legal proceedings between the parents.
5. Each parent will permit the child to display photographs of the other parent or both parents in the child’s room.
6. Neither parent shall communicate moral judgments about the other parent to the child concerning the other parent’s choice of values, lifestyle, choice of friends, successes or failures in life (career, financial, relational) or residential choice.
7. The parents will acknowledge to the child that the child has two homes although the child may spend more time at one home than the other.
8. The parents shall cooperate to the greatest extent practicable in sharing time with the child.
9. Each parent will permit the child to retain, and allow easy access to, correspondence, greeting cards, and other written materials received from the other parent.
10. Each parent will respect the physical integrity of items possessed by the child which depict the other parent or remind the child of the other parent.
11. Neither parent will trivialize, or deny the existence of the other parent to the child.
12. Neither parent will interrogate the child about the other parent nor will either parent discourage comments by the child about the other parent.
13. Neither parent will intercept, “lose”, derail, “forget” or otherwise interfere with communications to the child from the other parent.
14. Neither parent will refuse to acknowledge that the child can have or should have good experiences with the other parent.
15. Neither parent will directly or indirectly attack or criticize to the child the extended family of the other parent, the other parent’s career, the living and travel arrangements of the other parent, or lawful activities of the other parent or associates of the other parent.
16. Neither parent will use the child as a “middleman” by using the child to communicate with the other parent on inappropriate topics.
17. Neither parent will undermine the other parent in the eyes of the child by engaging in the “circumstantial syndrome” which is done by manipulating, changing, or rearranging facts.
18. Neither parent will create for, or exaggerate to, the child differences between the parents.
19. Neither parent will say and do things with an eye to gaining the child as an “ally” against the other parent.
20. Neither parent will encourage or instruct the child to be disobedient to the other parent, stepparents, or relatives.
21. Neither parent will reward the child to act negatively toward the other parent.
22. Neither parent will try to make the child believe he or she loves the child more than the other parent, by, for example, saying that he or she loves the child more than the other parent or over-informing the child on adult topics or overindulging the child.
23. Neither parent will discuss child support issues with the child.
24. Neither parent will engage in judgmental, opinionated or negative commentary, physical inspections or interrogations once the child arrives from his/her other home.
25. Neither parent will “rewrite” or “re-script” facts which the child originally knows to be different.
26. Neither parent will punish the child physically or threaten such punishment in order to influence the child to adopt the parent’s negative program, if any, against the other parent.
27. Neither parent will permit the child to be transported by a person who is intoxicated due to consumption of alcohol or illegal drugs.
28. Neither parent will smoke tobacco materials inside structures or vehicles occupied at the time by the child.
29. Each parent will permit the child to carry gifts, toys, clothing, and other items belonging to the child with him or her to the residence of the other parent or relatives or permit the child to take gifts, toys, clothing, and other items belonging to the child back to the residence of the other parent, as the case may be, to facilitate the child having with him or her objects, important to the child. The gifts, toys, clothing and other items belonging to the child referred to here mean items which are reasonable transportable and does not include pets (which the parents agree are impractical to move about).
Once upon a time, the state limited its involvement in the affairs of parents, divorced or otherwise, in cases of physical abuse. Now the state and meddling government bureaucrats are in the business of dictating subjective behavior and deciding what opinions are acceptable. Minor infractions are used to take children from their parents and force them into the abusive “Child Protective” system.
How long before the state and “social workers” are dictating and monitoring the daily behavior of all parents? Across the country, children are locked down in government schools, forced to take deadly vaccinations under color of law.
Link ----> http://www.co.travis.tx.us/dro/children_rights.asp
Welcome to Texas....
“Marriage is a contract between adults, and when it ends, the matter is between the adults also,” writes Robertson. “Yet no parental action has a greater impact on children. Children love their parents and want to be with them. Even in times of great stress, parents have a responsibility to conduct their legal affairs in a manner that will protect their children from adult conflicts.”
However, the bill transcends the realm of legal affairs and mandates how adults will conduct themselves in relation to their own children, including the displaying photographs, making phone calls, and sending and receiving correspondence and greeting cards.
Bureaucrats in Travis County have forcibly inserted the state into all manner of private minutiae, once the province of families but now apparently the business of government. The list is exhaustive:
1. Neither parent shall deny the child reasonable use of the telephone to place and receive calls with the other parent and relatives.
2. Neither parent shall speak or write derogatory remarks about the other parent to the child, or engage in abusive, coarse or foul language, which can be overheard by the child whether or not the language involves the other parent.
3. Neither parent shall permit the children to overhear arguments, negotiations or other substantive discussions about legal or business dealings between the parents.
4. Neither parent shall physically or psychologically attempt to pressure, attempt to influence, pressure or influence the children concerning the personal opinion or position of the child concerning legal proceedings between the parents.
5. Each parent will permit the child to display photographs of the other parent or both parents in the child’s room.
6. Neither parent shall communicate moral judgments about the other parent to the child concerning the other parent’s choice of values, lifestyle, choice of friends, successes or failures in life (career, financial, relational) or residential choice.
7. The parents will acknowledge to the child that the child has two homes although the child may spend more time at one home than the other.
8. The parents shall cooperate to the greatest extent practicable in sharing time with the child.
9. Each parent will permit the child to retain, and allow easy access to, correspondence, greeting cards, and other written materials received from the other parent.
10. Each parent will respect the physical integrity of items possessed by the child which depict the other parent or remind the child of the other parent.
11. Neither parent will trivialize, or deny the existence of the other parent to the child.
12. Neither parent will interrogate the child about the other parent nor will either parent discourage comments by the child about the other parent.
13. Neither parent will intercept, “lose”, derail, “forget” or otherwise interfere with communications to the child from the other parent.
14. Neither parent will refuse to acknowledge that the child can have or should have good experiences with the other parent.
15. Neither parent will directly or indirectly attack or criticize to the child the extended family of the other parent, the other parent’s career, the living and travel arrangements of the other parent, or lawful activities of the other parent or associates of the other parent.
16. Neither parent will use the child as a “middleman” by using the child to communicate with the other parent on inappropriate topics.
17. Neither parent will undermine the other parent in the eyes of the child by engaging in the “circumstantial syndrome” which is done by manipulating, changing, or rearranging facts.
18. Neither parent will create for, or exaggerate to, the child differences between the parents.
19. Neither parent will say and do things with an eye to gaining the child as an “ally” against the other parent.
20. Neither parent will encourage or instruct the child to be disobedient to the other parent, stepparents, or relatives.
21. Neither parent will reward the child to act negatively toward the other parent.
22. Neither parent will try to make the child believe he or she loves the child more than the other parent, by, for example, saying that he or she loves the child more than the other parent or over-informing the child on adult topics or overindulging the child.
23. Neither parent will discuss child support issues with the child.
24. Neither parent will engage in judgmental, opinionated or negative commentary, physical inspections or interrogations once the child arrives from his/her other home.
25. Neither parent will “rewrite” or “re-script” facts which the child originally knows to be different.
26. Neither parent will punish the child physically or threaten such punishment in order to influence the child to adopt the parent’s negative program, if any, against the other parent.
27. Neither parent will permit the child to be transported by a person who is intoxicated due to consumption of alcohol or illegal drugs.
28. Neither parent will smoke tobacco materials inside structures or vehicles occupied at the time by the child.
29. Each parent will permit the child to carry gifts, toys, clothing, and other items belonging to the child with him or her to the residence of the other parent or relatives or permit the child to take gifts, toys, clothing, and other items belonging to the child back to the residence of the other parent, as the case may be, to facilitate the child having with him or her objects, important to the child. The gifts, toys, clothing and other items belonging to the child referred to here mean items which are reasonable transportable and does not include pets (which the parents agree are impractical to move about).
Once upon a time, the state limited its involvement in the affairs of parents, divorced or otherwise, in cases of physical abuse. Now the state and meddling government bureaucrats are in the business of dictating subjective behavior and deciding what opinions are acceptable. Minor infractions are used to take children from their parents and force them into the abusive “Child Protective” system.
How long before the state and “social workers” are dictating and monitoring the daily behavior of all parents? Across the country, children are locked down in government schools, forced to take deadly vaccinations under color of law.
Link ----> http://www.co.travis.tx.us/dro/children_rights.asp
Welcome to Texas....
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Great speakers
Last night after attending our meeting I recalled a talk that I gave in front of about 80 or so brothers and sisters. What I recalled was how I gave the talk and how others give their talks. The training I call it to become a great speaker. I thought of those who inspired me. Although some may find it offensive you must admit these are indeed great speakers.
Here is another one that I often enjoyed listening to
Here is another one that I often enjoyed listening to.
Please note that I don't share his views on how he feels but you must admit just hearing him makes you want to hear more. Notice his speech, notice how he gives he speech, and notice how much emotion he puts into his speeches. That's what I mean. Martin Luther King's I dream speech was a great speech. I love it. When I give my talks, I often try to give as much emotion that I can do without over doing it.
I remember giving a talk on counsel or the proper view of it. Till this very day people still talk about that talk. I tell them thank you but the feeling I get inside is joy because I helped encourage another brother or sister to fight another day in this wicked system of things. It's hard to stay moral or have any when there is so much wickedness to turn to.
It's funny because just the other day at work they were talking about other celebrity woman and asked who I would sleep with if I had the chance. I told them that I don't look at any other woman in that fashion. I love my wife very much. For some odd reason they couldn't understand that. You have understand what Jesus said. Jesus said that everyone that keeps on looking at a woman so as to have a passion for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
I love my wife very much and to think of any other would be very dis-respectful of her and my marriage. Call me old fashion but remember Jesus's words next time you go to a strip club. If Jesus wouldn't go with you to a strip club why should you go? Common sense folks. Anyway have a great day.
Here is another one that I often enjoyed listening to
Here is another one that I often enjoyed listening to.
Please note that I don't share his views on how he feels but you must admit just hearing him makes you want to hear more. Notice his speech, notice how he gives he speech, and notice how much emotion he puts into his speeches. That's what I mean. Martin Luther King's I dream speech was a great speech. I love it. When I give my talks, I often try to give as much emotion that I can do without over doing it.
I remember giving a talk on counsel or the proper view of it. Till this very day people still talk about that talk. I tell them thank you but the feeling I get inside is joy because I helped encourage another brother or sister to fight another day in this wicked system of things. It's hard to stay moral or have any when there is so much wickedness to turn to.
It's funny because just the other day at work they were talking about other celebrity woman and asked who I would sleep with if I had the chance. I told them that I don't look at any other woman in that fashion. I love my wife very much. For some odd reason they couldn't understand that. You have understand what Jesus said. Jesus said that everyone that keeps on looking at a woman so as to have a passion for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
I love my wife very much and to think of any other would be very dis-respectful of her and my marriage. Call me old fashion but remember Jesus's words next time you go to a strip club. If Jesus wouldn't go with you to a strip club why should you go? Common sense folks. Anyway have a great day.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Word
Several questions thrown my way. Sorry for the delay in answering them. I will try and answer most covering various topics. The first question asked was
Q. Why do I think that 9/11 was an inside job.
A. Well, if you haven't checked any of my posts on why then I suggest that you do. I also suggest that you just google search 9/11. There is always new information coming out about it. Keep an open mind when researching 9/11.
Q. Along time ago you talked about your son and a girl. What happened to that relationship.
A. Well they both had different priorities in life. Jesse wanted to devote his entire time serving God and his friendship with her was hurting him spiritually. He does care deeply about her but wanted to make sure his relationship with God was first.
Q. You say that Jesus is God's son but if you look at John 1:1 it states that he is God?
A. I have tried to explain this scripture many times. It's hard for some to believe that Jesus is the Son of God and not God himself. Keep this in mind. Jesus himself said he was created. The scriptures tell us that Jesus had a beginning thus being created. Someone had to create Jesus? The scriptures also tell us that God has always been. That alone should tell you that they are different. Father and Son.
Q. You say that you gave up many games, can you tell me what games you play now and what games you gave up?
A. I play wow, rockband, baskball on xbox. I used to play Urban Terror, Call of Duty, Quake series, Battlefield series. I gave those all up.
Q. What do you expect of people since you talk so much about your God?
A. I expect people to be themselves without closing the door or window to what might be truth. When I mentioned that I lived in the world that means that at a time I did study other religions before becoming a witness. I didn't have to do that but I did and each and every time someone comes along and tries to show me what they believe I just don't agree with them but I expect them to be respectful, all of us should be that way. If someone talks about going to Heaven, well I don't believe that we do and that scratches many religions of my belief meter. When they say we die and go to hell, I scratch them off my belief meter. It's ok to quote scripture and many do it but to understand what it means is an entire different thing. Even Jesus had to show many who read scriptures often that they didn't have a clear understanding.
Q. Did you know that the leader of the Watchtower was a freemason
A. I didn't answer this the last time it was asked so sorry I just forgot. Many ask about Charles Taze Russell. Many have tried to say that he was a freemason after his death. They even tried to say even back then that witnesses were a cult. Kinda like those who say Obama is a terrorist and never even met the man. But for Charles many of these things were said after his death. Freemasons, for their part, have stated that Russell was not a Freemason. They stated this not Witnesses and yes I know there are sites out there always trying to connect the two but there are also sites showing that even the Pope himself worships Satan. History is nothing more than His Story...
Q. You mentioned Halloween and I understand what you meant by not celebrating it, what about other holidays such as thanksgiving and Christmas?
A. Well I spoke of Halloween simply because I find it offensive to God. No different than if several guys put on white sheets and go to a black hood. Note I used to live in the hood and my mother lives there now thus the reference to hood. I find it offensive. As for thanksgiving. While admitting that the present celebration has some connection with the Pilgrims, where did these get the idea of a thanksgiving festival? Historians note that ‘harvest festivals’ were among the oldest known holidays. And there were several different harvest celebrations in existence at the time of the Pilgrims.
Of special interest is the fact that the Pilgrims did not flee directly from England to North America. They first fled to Holland. Although religiously free there, they were disappointed with the industrial way of life, the “new” language and their economic circumstances. So from Holland they sailed on The Mayflower to the “New World.” But, argue some, the time in Holland would have brought them in touch with European harvest festivals.
Special celebrations over good harvests had occurred in several of the early American colonies. Hence, the 1621 celebration was not unprecedented.
Eventually this holiday was observed annually in the New England area. However, it was not until 1789 that the first national Thanksgiving Day was proclaimed by George Washington. And, even after that precedent, this practice was not carried on by succeeding presidents. It is claimed that Thomas Jefferson condemned it during his two terms. Finally, as already noted, in 1863 Abraham Lincoln established a yearly national festival, which ensuing presidents have honored.
Why did some people oppose the idea? For one thing, many governors felt that it was an example of state interference with religion. Actually, in time the celebration itself became more political.
Not to mention what happened to the Indians after the meal. There is nothing really to celebrate since many men, woman, and children died.
Christmas well, I'll have to answer that one later but Jesus was not and I repeat not born on that date. I'll talk about that tomorrow. I want to thank you all for your questions, I know I didn't get to all of them. I do have them on a list and will answer them maybe every Friday or sometime during the week. Thank you.
Q. Why do I think that 9/11 was an inside job.
A. Well, if you haven't checked any of my posts on why then I suggest that you do. I also suggest that you just google search 9/11. There is always new information coming out about it. Keep an open mind when researching 9/11.
Q. Along time ago you talked about your son and a girl. What happened to that relationship.
A. Well they both had different priorities in life. Jesse wanted to devote his entire time serving God and his friendship with her was hurting him spiritually. He does care deeply about her but wanted to make sure his relationship with God was first.
Q. You say that Jesus is God's son but if you look at John 1:1 it states that he is God?
A. I have tried to explain this scripture many times. It's hard for some to believe that Jesus is the Son of God and not God himself. Keep this in mind. Jesus himself said he was created. The scriptures tell us that Jesus had a beginning thus being created. Someone had to create Jesus? The scriptures also tell us that God has always been. That alone should tell you that they are different. Father and Son.
Q. You say that you gave up many games, can you tell me what games you play now and what games you gave up?
A. I play wow, rockband, baskball on xbox. I used to play Urban Terror, Call of Duty, Quake series, Battlefield series. I gave those all up.
Q. What do you expect of people since you talk so much about your God?
A. I expect people to be themselves without closing the door or window to what might be truth. When I mentioned that I lived in the world that means that at a time I did study other religions before becoming a witness. I didn't have to do that but I did and each and every time someone comes along and tries to show me what they believe I just don't agree with them but I expect them to be respectful, all of us should be that way. If someone talks about going to Heaven, well I don't believe that we do and that scratches many religions of my belief meter. When they say we die and go to hell, I scratch them off my belief meter. It's ok to quote scripture and many do it but to understand what it means is an entire different thing. Even Jesus had to show many who read scriptures often that they didn't have a clear understanding.
Q. Did you know that the leader of the Watchtower was a freemason
A. I didn't answer this the last time it was asked so sorry I just forgot. Many ask about Charles Taze Russell. Many have tried to say that he was a freemason after his death. They even tried to say even back then that witnesses were a cult. Kinda like those who say Obama is a terrorist and never even met the man. But for Charles many of these things were said after his death. Freemasons, for their part, have stated that Russell was not a Freemason. They stated this not Witnesses and yes I know there are sites out there always trying to connect the two but there are also sites showing that even the Pope himself worships Satan. History is nothing more than His Story...
Q. You mentioned Halloween and I understand what you meant by not celebrating it, what about other holidays such as thanksgiving and Christmas?
A. Well I spoke of Halloween simply because I find it offensive to God. No different than if several guys put on white sheets and go to a black hood. Note I used to live in the hood and my mother lives there now thus the reference to hood. I find it offensive. As for thanksgiving. While admitting that the present celebration has some connection with the Pilgrims, where did these get the idea of a thanksgiving festival? Historians note that ‘harvest festivals’ were among the oldest known holidays. And there were several different harvest celebrations in existence at the time of the Pilgrims.
Of special interest is the fact that the Pilgrims did not flee directly from England to North America. They first fled to Holland. Although religiously free there, they were disappointed with the industrial way of life, the “new” language and their economic circumstances. So from Holland they sailed on The Mayflower to the “New World.” But, argue some, the time in Holland would have brought them in touch with European harvest festivals.
Special celebrations over good harvests had occurred in several of the early American colonies. Hence, the 1621 celebration was not unprecedented.
Eventually this holiday was observed annually in the New England area. However, it was not until 1789 that the first national Thanksgiving Day was proclaimed by George Washington. And, even after that precedent, this practice was not carried on by succeeding presidents. It is claimed that Thomas Jefferson condemned it during his two terms. Finally, as already noted, in 1863 Abraham Lincoln established a yearly national festival, which ensuing presidents have honored.
Why did some people oppose the idea? For one thing, many governors felt that it was an example of state interference with religion. Actually, in time the celebration itself became more political.
Not to mention what happened to the Indians after the meal. There is nothing really to celebrate since many men, woman, and children died.
Christmas well, I'll have to answer that one later but Jesus was not and I repeat not born on that date. I'll talk about that tomorrow. I want to thank you all for your questions, I know I didn't get to all of them. I do have them on a list and will answer them maybe every Friday or sometime during the week. Thank you.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Word up
I was thinking about this over the weekend because of what was mentioned to me a week ago. That is video game addiction. For some it can be just like a person who is addicted to drugs. You may deny it but it's real. I have read and written about video game addiction. I have known personally those who were addicted to video games.
Back in the day - Pac-Man, Asteroids, Space Invaders, Battlezone and Donkey Kong, video games have landed themselves not only in amusement arcades but also in corner drugstores, supermarkets, gas stations, fast-food parlors and nearly everywhere else that people congregate. This was before they entered into your home.
I remember stealing money from my mother just to play Donkey Kong jr. Pacman and games like it are in a different league compared to games today. Take for example Grand Theft Auto. The object of the game is to advance in a criminal organization by taking part in various crimes, such as prostitution and murder. Each of your actions has consequences. If you kill pedestrians in your stolen car, police officers chase you.
If you shoot one of them, the FBI gets involved. Kill an FBI agent, and the military seek to destroy you. Although the game is intended for those 17 and older, stores have been known to sell the game to younger children. Even 12-year-olds are expressing interest in playing. Reason I picked this game is because of what was said yesterday. Gabriel who is 5 years old, my son of course received a letter from another 5 year old in his class. After asking Gabriel in his letter a series of questions, one of the questions asked " What was your favorite video game ". His answer to his favorite game was " Grand Theft Auto 3 " I then said to myself, Wow this kid is 5 years old and his parents allow him to play this game?
At any age is this kind of game or games like it healthy for you? Spiritually speaking it's not. I often mentioned having a balance in life along with what entertains you. If you do play games make sure you do not neglect every other part of your life. For example, if you have a wife - you know that your wife has needs. Make sure those needs are met. If you have children, make sure you are playing with your kids. Last thing you want is your wife to leave you and your kids not knowing who their father was.
Is it real? Yes it is. One of the most popular games right now is World of Warcraft and since they just released WOTLK everyone is in a hurry to get to 80. Spend hours and hours and hours neglecting everything else in their life just to get to 80? It doesn't stop there. Now comes gearing up! Requires even more time. How are you going to do it? If you are to play games, you need to balance it out. If you have an addictive nature then maybe you shouldn't be playing at all.
Another popular game that was recently released was Call of Duty 5. I was a big fan of Call of Duty 4 and did play it for sometime before I deleted it and games like it. The scriptures don't spell everything out for us but there are guidelines we can follow of what to play and what not to play. For example you will not find a scripture that says not to smoke but there are guidelines and thus with games its the same thing. Use caution on what you do with your time. Before you know it, your kids are young men and women. Before you know it, your wife has left you or your husband has left you. Before you know it you are alone..................Till tomorrow....
Word up!!
Let me add because I was asked. This has nothing to do with me. Just pointing out the obvious. My family are very happy. Our relationship is great. I couldn't ask for a better wife and couldn't ask for better children. We are in the process of getting Jesse his first car!!
Back in the day - Pac-Man, Asteroids, Space Invaders, Battlezone and Donkey Kong, video games have landed themselves not only in amusement arcades but also in corner drugstores, supermarkets, gas stations, fast-food parlors and nearly everywhere else that people congregate. This was before they entered into your home.
I remember stealing money from my mother just to play Donkey Kong jr. Pacman and games like it are in a different league compared to games today. Take for example Grand Theft Auto. The object of the game is to advance in a criminal organization by taking part in various crimes, such as prostitution and murder. Each of your actions has consequences. If you kill pedestrians in your stolen car, police officers chase you.
If you shoot one of them, the FBI gets involved. Kill an FBI agent, and the military seek to destroy you. Although the game is intended for those 17 and older, stores have been known to sell the game to younger children. Even 12-year-olds are expressing interest in playing. Reason I picked this game is because of what was said yesterday. Gabriel who is 5 years old, my son of course received a letter from another 5 year old in his class. After asking Gabriel in his letter a series of questions, one of the questions asked " What was your favorite video game ". His answer to his favorite game was " Grand Theft Auto 3 " I then said to myself, Wow this kid is 5 years old and his parents allow him to play this game?
At any age is this kind of game or games like it healthy for you? Spiritually speaking it's not. I often mentioned having a balance in life along with what entertains you. If you do play games make sure you do not neglect every other part of your life. For example, if you have a wife - you know that your wife has needs. Make sure those needs are met. If you have children, make sure you are playing with your kids. Last thing you want is your wife to leave you and your kids not knowing who their father was.
Is it real? Yes it is. One of the most popular games right now is World of Warcraft and since they just released WOTLK everyone is in a hurry to get to 80. Spend hours and hours and hours neglecting everything else in their life just to get to 80? It doesn't stop there. Now comes gearing up! Requires even more time. How are you going to do it? If you are to play games, you need to balance it out. If you have an addictive nature then maybe you shouldn't be playing at all.
Another popular game that was recently released was Call of Duty 5. I was a big fan of Call of Duty 4 and did play it for sometime before I deleted it and games like it. The scriptures don't spell everything out for us but there are guidelines we can follow of what to play and what not to play. For example you will not find a scripture that says not to smoke but there are guidelines and thus with games its the same thing. Use caution on what you do with your time. Before you know it, your kids are young men and women. Before you know it, your wife has left you or your husband has left you. Before you know it you are alone..................Till tomorrow....
Word up!!
Let me add because I was asked. This has nothing to do with me. Just pointing out the obvious. My family are very happy. Our relationship is great. I couldn't ask for a better wife and couldn't ask for better children. We are in the process of getting Jesse his first car!!
Friday, November 14, 2008
The question asked
Yesterday I posted tons of info on what most likely will happen within the next four years. If a guy who has predicted what will happen in our future and has been correct tells us what's going to happen in our future again, I have confidence that it will happen.
It's no different than what the Bible tells us for our future. The topic is the question asked. The reason is because that was the exact question that was asked the other day. What attracted you to the truth?
As I heard several comments on what attracted others, I could help but think of what attracted me. I love my father very much. So much so that when he died I pulled him out the coffin just to give him a hug. I could not accept the fact that he was gone.
Because my father did black magic I was not sure if he went to Heaven. I felt that if the soul does go somewhere that he would have ended up in Hell. After all, when was the last time you heard any priest say, he is going to hell. He has no chance in Heaven.
Then I found out the truth about the condition of the dead and the possibility of their future return. At first I didn't believe it. What I was taught went against everything I was being taught. After all, we believe in an invisible God that we never saw. Kinda like Children who believe in Santa at first even though they never saw him. We believe in Jesus based on what we have read, we never saw him as well. So since I always had an open mind and always considered the possibility well, I looked into it.
What I learned not only brought me joy but also gave me the feeling of purpose. For the first time in my life I found out why were are here. Why were not created in Heaven first. Why we suffer and die. All these questions that plagued me.
The thought of seeing my father smile again is what attracted me. That is what I felt inside. You might reason that I would see him again once I die. One of the reasons why I don't believe that has nothing to do with scripture but common sense.
Let's say I die now at the age of 35. My wife would suffer. My children would suffer. As an angel I would see them suffer and have no power to do anything. I would hurt till the day they die and if my wife moved on to another, I would suffer.
Let's say my wife lived to the age of 90 that would mean for 55 years I would suffer watching her with another. Watching her get old. Watching her get sick. Seeing my children go through their issues. Then they all die and come up to Heaven and I can't hug them because we are all spirits now. You might reason that we would all be together but the cycle would always continue because now my children are watching their children suffer. It's hard for me to believe that God would setup that kind of system.
If God is a God of love which he himself says he is Love then that would not be loving of him. That is what we are taught. We die, we go to Heaven. Were bad, we go to hell. I was pleased to know that when we die, we are just asleep. Note what it mentions at Ecclesiastes 9:5,10.
For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.” Notice what it says in the new world translation
For the living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all, neither do they anymore have wages, because the remembrance of them has been forgotten.
They are not conscious at all. You would think that being an Angel perfect in all ways would remember your earthly life and be conscious of all that has happen. Scripture shows otherwise.
At Isaiah 25:8 the prophetic promise is made that God “will actually swallow up death forever. I trust in God that I will see my father again. I trust that he is the only one that can make this possible. Looking at the direction of the world condition, there is much to worry about.
The scriptures tell us to trust in God. To put his kingdom first. For my part, I shall do the best I can. Have a great weekend.
It's no different than what the Bible tells us for our future. The topic is the question asked. The reason is because that was the exact question that was asked the other day. What attracted you to the truth?
As I heard several comments on what attracted others, I could help but think of what attracted me. I love my father very much. So much so that when he died I pulled him out the coffin just to give him a hug. I could not accept the fact that he was gone.
Because my father did black magic I was not sure if he went to Heaven. I felt that if the soul does go somewhere that he would have ended up in Hell. After all, when was the last time you heard any priest say, he is going to hell. He has no chance in Heaven.
Then I found out the truth about the condition of the dead and the possibility of their future return. At first I didn't believe it. What I was taught went against everything I was being taught. After all, we believe in an invisible God that we never saw. Kinda like Children who believe in Santa at first even though they never saw him. We believe in Jesus based on what we have read, we never saw him as well. So since I always had an open mind and always considered the possibility well, I looked into it.
What I learned not only brought me joy but also gave me the feeling of purpose. For the first time in my life I found out why were are here. Why were not created in Heaven first. Why we suffer and die. All these questions that plagued me.
The thought of seeing my father smile again is what attracted me. That is what I felt inside. You might reason that I would see him again once I die. One of the reasons why I don't believe that has nothing to do with scripture but common sense.
Let's say I die now at the age of 35. My wife would suffer. My children would suffer. As an angel I would see them suffer and have no power to do anything. I would hurt till the day they die and if my wife moved on to another, I would suffer.
Let's say my wife lived to the age of 90 that would mean for 55 years I would suffer watching her with another. Watching her get old. Watching her get sick. Seeing my children go through their issues. Then they all die and come up to Heaven and I can't hug them because we are all spirits now. You might reason that we would all be together but the cycle would always continue because now my children are watching their children suffer. It's hard for me to believe that God would setup that kind of system.
If God is a God of love which he himself says he is Love then that would not be loving of him. That is what we are taught. We die, we go to Heaven. Were bad, we go to hell. I was pleased to know that when we die, we are just asleep. Note what it mentions at Ecclesiastes 9:5,10.
For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.” Notice what it says in the new world translation
For the living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all, neither do they anymore have wages, because the remembrance of them has been forgotten.
They are not conscious at all. You would think that being an Angel perfect in all ways would remember your earthly life and be conscious of all that has happen. Scripture shows otherwise.
At Isaiah 25:8 the prophetic promise is made that God “will actually swallow up death forever. I trust in God that I will see my father again. I trust that he is the only one that can make this possible. Looking at the direction of the world condition, there is much to worry about.
The scriptures tell us to trust in God. To put his kingdom first. For my part, I shall do the best I can. Have a great weekend.
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Economic 9/11
This is a mess folks. It's interesting to note that the date mentioned mentioned by the Mayan was 2012 which some say is the end of the world as we know it. Seeing how the books were destroyed it's hard to say what will happened year 2012. In the view he mentions 2012
This really is an Economic 9/11.This is a classic Titanic situation in the sense that what we saw with the Fannie and Freddie bailouts and the Bear Stearns bailouts and now the AIG request for more than forty billion more dollars from the federal government – it’s just like the Titanic where the rich and affluent were given the lifeboats and the rest of the people went under from steerage. The rich and powerful are too big to fail; the rest of us are too small to save.
The Feds cannot print enough money to save the day. We’re going into the worst depression that any living person has ever seen. It’s going to be worse than the Great Depression of 1929. I can and will promise you that.
Do you realize that Barack Obama recently said that he would not rescind the Bush tax cuts. He said this on ABC, September 7, 2008, IF the economy were in a recession. IF the economy is in RECESSION?! This is worse than a recession! We’re going into the greatest depression and people better beware.
I’ll tell you what I know other people are doing. They are taking their money out of the banks. People with a lot of money are moving it overseas into what they think are safer banks. LOL. There’s going to be a day here in the United States that the authorities are going to call a Bank Holiday. AIG is calling for more than $40 billion today. The Feds just bailed out Freddie Mac and Fannie Mac to the tune that could cost taxpayers up to $300 billion or more. Our national debt has been increased to at least $12 TRILLION Plus! Again - the Feds cannot print enough money to save the day.
You’re going to hear all those fat mouths out there that were saying that everything was OK, the FDIC was going to insure your money. Just like they did in Argentina and they did it in Brazil when their economies collapsed and their currencies collapsed and their economies were sinking. You’re not going to be able to get all your money out at one time. Our government is going to say, ‘It’s insured. Don’t worry about it, but we need to pause. Take a deep breath.’ Oh, boy, do they love that phrase! ‘Take a deep breath.’
September 13th the New York Times headlines story on the business page is to just pause and reflect. Don’t panic. Everything is OK. The ship is sinking and the best they can say is, ‘Doesn’t the band sound great!’
How is this the worst? Let's see how
1) In the 1929 Depression, not many people owned homes, so they weren’t carrying that heavy mortgage load. The people who did have homes did not have something called ‘home equity loans,’ which is more money owed on top of the other money. They used to have something else back then called a ‘second mortgage.’ If you had one, you were a loser.
2) Back in the 1929 Depression days, people didn’t have things called ‘credit cards.’
3) The United States didn’t have $14 Plus trillion worth of debt.
4) We still had a manufacturing base in the United States so that when WWII broke out and the economy improved afterwards, we were still able to produce more so than any other country in the world. But now, the U. S. off-shores so much manufacturing now.
5) Back in the Great Depression of 1929, the U. S. government was not $14 trillion in debt and they had a trade surplus, not a trade deficit.
6) We weren’t fighting two wars that have sapped already $2 trillion from our American treasury and it’s getting worse.
The American Dollar. Folks Keep your eyes open.
If you look at the markets today, what’s going up and what’s going down? The softer commodities are retreating and the only thing going up in the markets today is gold. It’s coming off its lows where it’s been battered down, but it’s up some $17.
What people I know are doing is taking their money and putting it into other currencies, particularly the Swiss franc, and putting it into more secure international banks, and betting against America on every level. And its only going to get worse. There is nothing to turn this around. What is the Federal Reserve going to do? Print more money?
When the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates not If when, they lower interest rates, you’re going to see the dollar plummet and yes I know they already have. If they keep interest rates the same, then we have the same situation we’re in now. They can’t raise interest rates. If they do, they will put the brakes on an already credit-squeezed economy and that will really push us into a really steep depression quicker than what anyone has seen. Looking across Europe, you can see the markets collapsing, along with the Russian market down 45%. There is no safety net. Ships do sink!
It’s about preserving what you have.In China, factory orders are plummeting. They have 1.2 billion people and millions of problems. So, they are not going to escape this global economic collapse either. There is no way out.
Remember the old fable about the grasshopper and the ant. The grasshopper played during the summer thinking it didn’t have to do anything to survive the cold winter coming. People are still acting like grasshoppers. What people are saying is, ‘I’m going to wait until after the elections to see what happens.’ To see what happens for what? The people running for office don’t have the economic skills.
So what will happen in 2009. Remember I posted this.
Take retail sales, for example. This Christmas 2008, you’re going to see major chains go bankrupt. If you can see Lehman Brothers go under – guess what? Macy’s, J. C. Penny, GAP and the rest of them could go down, too.
All these companies, like the leverage buyout firms, have been built on an economic model of growth and expansion. That means opening new stores in new locations, but not necessarily increasing in store sales. You’re going to see major bankruptcies. It’s going to happen. It has happened, remember C.City?
You’re also going to see violence go to levels we’ve never seen before. You’re going to start to see gangland mentality that is running through Mexico start seeping up north into the United States. The Mexican government cannot control the level of violence. And we’re going to start to see it happening here: more gangs, more kidnappings, more violence and crime. The knee jerk reaction, of course, will be more police on the streets and that is not going to solve the problem.
We’re also going to see more movements for the break up of the American government – not necessarily in 2009 and so on, but we can certainly see the secessionist movements that have been gaining more strength because the federal government cannot fix this problem. It’s too big.
Greenspan is the guy that’s behind this whole collapse. By lowering interest rates during the dotcom bubble of 2000. They lowered the interest rates to 46-year-lows and created the situation that exists now for all this cheap money and all the financial games. Greenspan is the Prince of Destruction. The Federal Reserve is what is behind the destruction of this country and now Greenspan is warning us! He’s the one who caused all this!
Ron Paul has informed the people that the Federal Reserve is basically a rogue organization. It’s a private bank, it’s not a federal agency. They have taken the power of the money printing press out of the hands of Congress (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5) that gives Congress the sole authority to print and regulate the money supply. And Alan Greenspan is the one that caused this Great Depression. He started it by bailing out the big guys following the 1987 Stock Market Crash, following the 1997 Asian currency crisis, following the 1998 long-term capital management bailout. This is what keeps happening – bailing out the big guys by printing cheap money because their friends are too big to fail.
The 9/11 attack happened and it was the greatest military strike in history, I don't care which side you think did it. It brought down the financial pillars of the United States figuratively and literally.
The United States as not recuperated from the great strike of 9/11 and the debacle of the dotcom crash. It was temporarily ameliorated by Greenspan by putting interest rates at 46-year-lows and creating the credit bubble. So, it’s over now.
The United States looks like to me what you see when a third world country starts going into chaos like any other failing empire. It’s going to be a very ugly scene. As I said, we’re going to see more crime. We’re going to see more federal intrusion into our lives. We are going to see more geopolitical turmoil. We’re going to start seeing our minds diverted from the financial crisis into more geopolitical affairs. We can also see by Election Day 2008 that the United States is involved in a major geopolitical confrontation, whether it is Iran or Russia.
You know, the Russians are really angry at America right now because of Georgia invading South Oscettia and Russia’s response!!
Start watching the gas spicket being turned going into the Ukraine and Europe. I’m not certain of the number, but I believe it is 40% to 60% of the natural gas that Europe uses comes out of Russia. You’re going to start seeing Russia turn off spickets. You’re going to see the same thing happen in Venezuela. Those countries are going to start making energy really difficult to get. They aren’t going to give their product away. At the end of the day, Russia and Venezuela are going to get more money for their petroleum products.
The U. S. has no leverage with anybody now. We’re leveraged out. We used to be able to play the financial card. We can’t play that anymore. We used to play the military card. We can’t play that anymore. The United States is losing third world street fights in Afghanistan and Iraq. I don’t care about people telling me the surge is working. That is fairy tale language. As soon as there is a little rest, they are going to attack again. There were major bombings again this last week and they are not going to stop until the United States is thrown out. So, now you have all these countries that have weapons of mass destruction. They are not going to bow to America. It’s not like the old days of Venezuela or Chile or Argentina or Bolivia getting out of hand and the United States sends down gunboat diplomacy.
Folks those days are over. They are going to fight back and not with bows and arrows and little weaponry. They are armed to the teeth. So, the U. S. has lost its military supremacy and its economic supremacy. Yes, the United States could obliterate any country and bomb them into the Stone Age. But that country, what’s left of it, will retaliate again.
There is still a hole in the ground after the 9/11 attacks. That’s a metaphor. If anybody thinks the American government has the wherewithal, the intelligence or the integrity to get anything done, there is still a hole in the ground seven years later, there are still levees that have not been properly re-built after Katrina and people still can’t vote in the United States and have their vote properly counted because the voting machines don’t work. That’s America now.
It’s ironic in the fact that the international community bought into the same myths as everyone else. It’s greed that ruined this country and it’s greed that is ruining others. They all played the quick money game.
Another irony is that people could thrive in these times because as the old is dying, something new is being born. If there is intelligence, integrity and dignity behind the next movement, we could move into a new Renaissance, a brighter time and not a dark one.
I don't know how long it will take to get out of this mess. As long as it took 1929 and that was a war. And unfortunately, that’s the way authorities will start thinking. The only thing more I can say for this country is that the American people need to regain their dignity and look at their own moral base and what they are accepting as truth and lies. The only thing that will save us is enlightened leadership. I think it has to come from the individual and move up.
And unless people change the way they are living their lives, nothing is going to change. These people, Obama, McCain, Biden and Palin aren’t my leaders. They couldn’t lead me across the street! When are the American people find their own strength and become their own leaders? Until individual people find their own greatness within, nothing is going to change.
To everybody out there, make provisions now like the ant did for a cold, brutal winter wherever you live. Things are going to get very tough. Don’t waste a dime you don’t need to waste. Preserve and Save.
Let me just add for those who were upset over the 700 Billion dollar payout not bailout look at this
http://www.forbes.com/home/2008/11/12/paulson-bernanke-fed-biz-wall-cx_lm_1112bailout.html
This really is an Economic 9/11.This is a classic Titanic situation in the sense that what we saw with the Fannie and Freddie bailouts and the Bear Stearns bailouts and now the AIG request for more than forty billion more dollars from the federal government – it’s just like the Titanic where the rich and affluent were given the lifeboats and the rest of the people went under from steerage. The rich and powerful are too big to fail; the rest of us are too small to save.
The Feds cannot print enough money to save the day. We’re going into the worst depression that any living person has ever seen. It’s going to be worse than the Great Depression of 1929. I can and will promise you that.
Do you realize that Barack Obama recently said that he would not rescind the Bush tax cuts. He said this on ABC, September 7, 2008, IF the economy were in a recession. IF the economy is in RECESSION?! This is worse than a recession! We’re going into the greatest depression and people better beware.
I’ll tell you what I know other people are doing. They are taking their money out of the banks. People with a lot of money are moving it overseas into what they think are safer banks. LOL. There’s going to be a day here in the United States that the authorities are going to call a Bank Holiday. AIG is calling for more than $40 billion today. The Feds just bailed out Freddie Mac and Fannie Mac to the tune that could cost taxpayers up to $300 billion or more. Our national debt has been increased to at least $12 TRILLION Plus! Again - the Feds cannot print enough money to save the day.
You’re going to hear all those fat mouths out there that were saying that everything was OK, the FDIC was going to insure your money. Just like they did in Argentina and they did it in Brazil when their economies collapsed and their currencies collapsed and their economies were sinking. You’re not going to be able to get all your money out at one time. Our government is going to say, ‘It’s insured. Don’t worry about it, but we need to pause. Take a deep breath.’ Oh, boy, do they love that phrase! ‘Take a deep breath.’
September 13th the New York Times headlines story on the business page is to just pause and reflect. Don’t panic. Everything is OK. The ship is sinking and the best they can say is, ‘Doesn’t the band sound great!’
How is this the worst? Let's see how
1) In the 1929 Depression, not many people owned homes, so they weren’t carrying that heavy mortgage load. The people who did have homes did not have something called ‘home equity loans,’ which is more money owed on top of the other money. They used to have something else back then called a ‘second mortgage.’ If you had one, you were a loser.
2) Back in the 1929 Depression days, people didn’t have things called ‘credit cards.’
3) The United States didn’t have $14 Plus trillion worth of debt.
4) We still had a manufacturing base in the United States so that when WWII broke out and the economy improved afterwards, we were still able to produce more so than any other country in the world. But now, the U. S. off-shores so much manufacturing now.
5) Back in the Great Depression of 1929, the U. S. government was not $14 trillion in debt and they had a trade surplus, not a trade deficit.
6) We weren’t fighting two wars that have sapped already $2 trillion from our American treasury and it’s getting worse.
The American Dollar. Folks Keep your eyes open.
If you look at the markets today, what’s going up and what’s going down? The softer commodities are retreating and the only thing going up in the markets today is gold. It’s coming off its lows where it’s been battered down, but it’s up some $17.
What people I know are doing is taking their money and putting it into other currencies, particularly the Swiss franc, and putting it into more secure international banks, and betting against America on every level. And its only going to get worse. There is nothing to turn this around. What is the Federal Reserve going to do? Print more money?
When the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates not If when, they lower interest rates, you’re going to see the dollar plummet and yes I know they already have. If they keep interest rates the same, then we have the same situation we’re in now. They can’t raise interest rates. If they do, they will put the brakes on an already credit-squeezed economy and that will really push us into a really steep depression quicker than what anyone has seen. Looking across Europe, you can see the markets collapsing, along with the Russian market down 45%. There is no safety net. Ships do sink!
It’s about preserving what you have.In China, factory orders are plummeting. They have 1.2 billion people and millions of problems. So, they are not going to escape this global economic collapse either. There is no way out.
Remember the old fable about the grasshopper and the ant. The grasshopper played during the summer thinking it didn’t have to do anything to survive the cold winter coming. People are still acting like grasshoppers. What people are saying is, ‘I’m going to wait until after the elections to see what happens.’ To see what happens for what? The people running for office don’t have the economic skills.
So what will happen in 2009. Remember I posted this.
Take retail sales, for example. This Christmas 2008, you’re going to see major chains go bankrupt. If you can see Lehman Brothers go under – guess what? Macy’s, J. C. Penny, GAP and the rest of them could go down, too.
All these companies, like the leverage buyout firms, have been built on an economic model of growth and expansion. That means opening new stores in new locations, but not necessarily increasing in store sales. You’re going to see major bankruptcies. It’s going to happen. It has happened, remember C.City?
You’re also going to see violence go to levels we’ve never seen before. You’re going to start to see gangland mentality that is running through Mexico start seeping up north into the United States. The Mexican government cannot control the level of violence. And we’re going to start to see it happening here: more gangs, more kidnappings, more violence and crime. The knee jerk reaction, of course, will be more police on the streets and that is not going to solve the problem.
We’re also going to see more movements for the break up of the American government – not necessarily in 2009 and so on, but we can certainly see the secessionist movements that have been gaining more strength because the federal government cannot fix this problem. It’s too big.
Greenspan is the guy that’s behind this whole collapse. By lowering interest rates during the dotcom bubble of 2000. They lowered the interest rates to 46-year-lows and created the situation that exists now for all this cheap money and all the financial games. Greenspan is the Prince of Destruction. The Federal Reserve is what is behind the destruction of this country and now Greenspan is warning us! He’s the one who caused all this!
Ron Paul has informed the people that the Federal Reserve is basically a rogue organization. It’s a private bank, it’s not a federal agency. They have taken the power of the money printing press out of the hands of Congress (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5) that gives Congress the sole authority to print and regulate the money supply. And Alan Greenspan is the one that caused this Great Depression. He started it by bailing out the big guys following the 1987 Stock Market Crash, following the 1997 Asian currency crisis, following the 1998 long-term capital management bailout. This is what keeps happening – bailing out the big guys by printing cheap money because their friends are too big to fail.
The 9/11 attack happened and it was the greatest military strike in history, I don't care which side you think did it. It brought down the financial pillars of the United States figuratively and literally.
The United States as not recuperated from the great strike of 9/11 and the debacle of the dotcom crash. It was temporarily ameliorated by Greenspan by putting interest rates at 46-year-lows and creating the credit bubble. So, it’s over now.
The United States looks like to me what you see when a third world country starts going into chaos like any other failing empire. It’s going to be a very ugly scene. As I said, we’re going to see more crime. We’re going to see more federal intrusion into our lives. We are going to see more geopolitical turmoil. We’re going to start seeing our minds diverted from the financial crisis into more geopolitical affairs. We can also see by Election Day 2008 that the United States is involved in a major geopolitical confrontation, whether it is Iran or Russia.
You know, the Russians are really angry at America right now because of Georgia invading South Oscettia and Russia’s response!!
Start watching the gas spicket being turned going into the Ukraine and Europe. I’m not certain of the number, but I believe it is 40% to 60% of the natural gas that Europe uses comes out of Russia. You’re going to start seeing Russia turn off spickets. You’re going to see the same thing happen in Venezuela. Those countries are going to start making energy really difficult to get. They aren’t going to give their product away. At the end of the day, Russia and Venezuela are going to get more money for their petroleum products.
The U. S. has no leverage with anybody now. We’re leveraged out. We used to be able to play the financial card. We can’t play that anymore. We used to play the military card. We can’t play that anymore. The United States is losing third world street fights in Afghanistan and Iraq. I don’t care about people telling me the surge is working. That is fairy tale language. As soon as there is a little rest, they are going to attack again. There were major bombings again this last week and they are not going to stop until the United States is thrown out. So, now you have all these countries that have weapons of mass destruction. They are not going to bow to America. It’s not like the old days of Venezuela or Chile or Argentina or Bolivia getting out of hand and the United States sends down gunboat diplomacy.
Folks those days are over. They are going to fight back and not with bows and arrows and little weaponry. They are armed to the teeth. So, the U. S. has lost its military supremacy and its economic supremacy. Yes, the United States could obliterate any country and bomb them into the Stone Age. But that country, what’s left of it, will retaliate again.
There is still a hole in the ground after the 9/11 attacks. That’s a metaphor. If anybody thinks the American government has the wherewithal, the intelligence or the integrity to get anything done, there is still a hole in the ground seven years later, there are still levees that have not been properly re-built after Katrina and people still can’t vote in the United States and have their vote properly counted because the voting machines don’t work. That’s America now.
It’s ironic in the fact that the international community bought into the same myths as everyone else. It’s greed that ruined this country and it’s greed that is ruining others. They all played the quick money game.
Another irony is that people could thrive in these times because as the old is dying, something new is being born. If there is intelligence, integrity and dignity behind the next movement, we could move into a new Renaissance, a brighter time and not a dark one.
I don't know how long it will take to get out of this mess. As long as it took 1929 and that was a war. And unfortunately, that’s the way authorities will start thinking. The only thing more I can say for this country is that the American people need to regain their dignity and look at their own moral base and what they are accepting as truth and lies. The only thing that will save us is enlightened leadership. I think it has to come from the individual and move up.
And unless people change the way they are living their lives, nothing is going to change. These people, Obama, McCain, Biden and Palin aren’t my leaders. They couldn’t lead me across the street! When are the American people find their own strength and become their own leaders? Until individual people find their own greatness within, nothing is going to change.
To everybody out there, make provisions now like the ant did for a cold, brutal winter wherever you live. Things are going to get very tough. Don’t waste a dime you don’t need to waste. Preserve and Save.
Let me just add for those who were upset over the 700 Billion dollar payout not bailout look at this
http://www.forbes.com/home/2008/11/12/paulson-bernanke-fed-biz-wall-cx_lm_1112bailout.html
WOTLK
With all that is happening I forgot to mention that WOTLK was released today. The long awaited DeathKnight is finally here. I've read what they can do and what they are about. Also the level cap of course is 80. For those who have been waiting for something new well WOTLK will do it for you.
I have seen some of the new instances and it looks simply amazing. But my love right now is Rockband....
Of Course here is a video of the Guitar
Drums:
Woot!!!
I have seen some of the new instances and it looks simply amazing. But my love right now is Rockband....
Of Course here is a video of the Guitar
Drums:
Woot!!!
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Idol worship?
Is the cross an Idol? An idol is an image, a representation of anything, or a symbol that is an object of passionate devotion, whether material or imagined. Generally speaking, idolatry is the veneration, love, worship, or adoration of an idol. It is usually practiced toward a real or supposed higher power, whether such power is believed to have animate existence (as a human, an animal, or an organization) or is inanimate (as a force or lifeless object of nature). Idolatry generally involves some form, ceremony, or ritual.
The Scriptures do not sanction the use of images as a means to address God in prayer. Such a practice runs counter to the principle that those seeking to serve God must worship him with spirit and truth. He tolerates no mixing of idolatrous practices with true worship, as is illustrated by his condemnation of calf worship, although the Israelites had attached his name thereto. God does not share his glory with graven images.
Acts of idolatry referred to in the Bible included such revolting practices as ceremonial prostitution, child sacrifice, drunkenness, and self-laceration to the point of causing blood to flow. Idols were venerated by partaking of food and drink in festivals or ceremonies in their honor by bowing and sacrificing to them, by song and dance before them, and even by a kiss. Idolatry was also committed by arranging a table of food and drink for false gods, by making drink offerings, sacrificial cakes, and sacrificial smoke, and by weeping in religious ceremony. Certain actions, such as tattooing the flesh, making cuttings upon the flesh, imposing baldness on the forehead, cutting the sidelocks, and destroying the extremity of the beard, were prohibited by the Law, possibly, at least in part, because of being linked with prevailing idolatrous practices of neighboring peoples.
Then there are the more subtle forms of idolatry. Covetousness is idolatry , since the object of an individual’s cravings diverts affection from the Creator and thus, in effect, becomes an idol. Instead of serving God in faithfulness, a person can become a slave to his belly, that is, to fleshly desire or appetite, and make this his god. Since love for the Creator is demonstrated by obedience, rebellion and pushing ahead presumptuously are comparable to acts of idolatry.
Many church buildings are filled with images of Jesus, of Mary and of the “saints.” Hundreds of people are seen daily bowing down before these images.People thus bowing down profess to be bound by the Ten Commandments, yet one of these says: “You must not make for yourself a carved image or a form like anything that is in the heavens above or that is on the earth underneath or that is in the waters under the earth. You must not bow down to them nor be induced to serve them, because I Jehovah your God am a God exacting exclusive devotion.”—Ex. 20:4, 5.
Now if a persons says that it's fine to bow down in front of a cross then really what are you doing? Aren't you doing the same thing that those in Moses's time did? Show me in the bible where it states to create a cross like Jesus and for people to bow down before it? You won't find it.
So why bow down to a cross and did Jesus die on a cross? The traditionally shaped cross has long been accepted by many as the symbol of the Christian religion. Is that what the Bible and the facts of history show? According to Webster’s dictionary a cross is “a structure, typically an upright supporting a horizontal beam, anciently used in the execution of malefactors.” In the Bible the Greek word usually rendered cross is stauros. Its Latin equivalent is crux. Was the stauros or crux on which Christ died a traditionally shaped cross?
The Encyclopædia Britannica, 1907 and 1942 editions, under the term “cross” states that Christ is “generally believed” to have died on such a cross, that at best it is only “by general tradition” that the matter is established. And concerning the terms stauros and crux we are told that ‘stauros properly means merely a stake.’ “In Livy [Roman historian shortly before Christ’s ministry] even, crux means a mere stake.” “The Hebrews have no word for Cross more definite than ‘wood.
Clearly there is no Scriptural support for the traditional cross as a symbol of Christianity. Then how can its adoption by professed Christians be accounted for? It was borrowed from the surrounding pagans. It is another one of the many paganisms that the early apostate Christians adopted so as to appeal to the pagans and to be more like them. In this they followed the example of the Israelites who wanted a king so as to be like the nations round about. Note that none of those even Paul carried a cross.
So is it possible that maybe using the cross really is idol worship? You be the judge
The Scriptures do not sanction the use of images as a means to address God in prayer. Such a practice runs counter to the principle that those seeking to serve God must worship him with spirit and truth. He tolerates no mixing of idolatrous practices with true worship, as is illustrated by his condemnation of calf worship, although the Israelites had attached his name thereto. God does not share his glory with graven images.
Acts of idolatry referred to in the Bible included such revolting practices as ceremonial prostitution, child sacrifice, drunkenness, and self-laceration to the point of causing blood to flow. Idols were venerated by partaking of food and drink in festivals or ceremonies in their honor by bowing and sacrificing to them, by song and dance before them, and even by a kiss. Idolatry was also committed by arranging a table of food and drink for false gods, by making drink offerings, sacrificial cakes, and sacrificial smoke, and by weeping in religious ceremony. Certain actions, such as tattooing the flesh, making cuttings upon the flesh, imposing baldness on the forehead, cutting the sidelocks, and destroying the extremity of the beard, were prohibited by the Law, possibly, at least in part, because of being linked with prevailing idolatrous practices of neighboring peoples.
Then there are the more subtle forms of idolatry. Covetousness is idolatry , since the object of an individual’s cravings diverts affection from the Creator and thus, in effect, becomes an idol. Instead of serving God in faithfulness, a person can become a slave to his belly, that is, to fleshly desire or appetite, and make this his god. Since love for the Creator is demonstrated by obedience, rebellion and pushing ahead presumptuously are comparable to acts of idolatry.
Many church buildings are filled with images of Jesus, of Mary and of the “saints.” Hundreds of people are seen daily bowing down before these images.People thus bowing down profess to be bound by the Ten Commandments, yet one of these says: “You must not make for yourself a carved image or a form like anything that is in the heavens above or that is on the earth underneath or that is in the waters under the earth. You must not bow down to them nor be induced to serve them, because I Jehovah your God am a God exacting exclusive devotion.”—Ex. 20:4, 5.
Now if a persons says that it's fine to bow down in front of a cross then really what are you doing? Aren't you doing the same thing that those in Moses's time did? Show me in the bible where it states to create a cross like Jesus and for people to bow down before it? You won't find it.
So why bow down to a cross and did Jesus die on a cross? The traditionally shaped cross has long been accepted by many as the symbol of the Christian religion. Is that what the Bible and the facts of history show? According to Webster’s dictionary a cross is “a structure, typically an upright supporting a horizontal beam, anciently used in the execution of malefactors.” In the Bible the Greek word usually rendered cross is stauros. Its Latin equivalent is crux. Was the stauros or crux on which Christ died a traditionally shaped cross?
The Encyclopædia Britannica, 1907 and 1942 editions, under the term “cross” states that Christ is “generally believed” to have died on such a cross, that at best it is only “by general tradition” that the matter is established. And concerning the terms stauros and crux we are told that ‘stauros properly means merely a stake.’ “In Livy [Roman historian shortly before Christ’s ministry] even, crux means a mere stake.” “The Hebrews have no word for Cross more definite than ‘wood.
Clearly there is no Scriptural support for the traditional cross as a symbol of Christianity. Then how can its adoption by professed Christians be accounted for? It was borrowed from the surrounding pagans. It is another one of the many paganisms that the early apostate Christians adopted so as to appeal to the pagans and to be more like them. In this they followed the example of the Israelites who wanted a king so as to be like the nations round about. Note that none of those even Paul carried a cross.
So is it possible that maybe using the cross really is idol worship? You be the judge
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Video Tapes of plane that hit Pentagon?
85 videos!!!
The videos taken from the Pentagon area after the 9/11 attacks were mentioned in the Maguire declaration, where FBI Special Agent, Jacqueline Maguire responded to a request from Scott Bingham.
In Summary:
* She determined that the FBI had 85 videotaptes that might be relevant. Of those, 56 "of these videotapes did not show either the Pentagon building, the Pentagon crash site, or the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11."
* Of the 29 remaining videotapes, 16 "did not show the Pentagon crash site and did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon."
* Of the 13 remaining tapes which showed the Pentagon crash site, 12 "only showed after the impact of Flight 77."
* The videotape taken from the Citgo gas station did not show the impact.
* No videotapes were located from the Sheraton Hotel, though she located a videotape from the Doubletree Hotel.
A list of all the videotapes is available, which shows many of these videotapes do not have footage of the Pentagon at all. Instead, many have footage of the WTC, some are security video tapes taken from a Kinko's in Florida, etc. Some that show the Pentagon were taken days after the attacks, and some in the evening of 9/11/2001.
The security camera footage taken from around the Pentagon included the Citgo, the Doubletree, and the Pentagon parking lot. There was also video from cameras at Reagan National Airport parking garage. Both video files show smoke in the distance coming from direction of Pentagon. Another video came from a DEA HQ security camera atop 700 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA. The camera was repositioned after attack to show post-crash footage of Pentagon.
Footage taken after the attack included home video filmed by a tourist traveling past Pentagon and then by AP photographer who borrowed the camera, and video taken by a NBC4 Washington reporter.
The list of 85 videos
Five videotapes were recovered from the post-attack Pentagon crime scene and submitted to the FBI Laboratory in Quantico.
13 videos were obtained by the Defense Protective Services (DPS) - Pentagon Police - on 9/25/2001 from individual filming Pentagon site from Boundary Channel Drive. These included footage from the WTC site in the days after the attcks.
* One (1) Beta video tape - interviews in NYC
* One (1) DVCAM tape labeled "Twin Towers, World Trade Center" - NYC/WTC
* One (1) DVCAM tape - suburban setting, unknown individuals, dated 9/12-13
* One (1) DVCAM tape - NYC/WTC, 9/21-22
* One (1) DVCAM tape - NYC/WTC, 9/22-23
* One (1) DVCAM tape - NYC 9/23
* One (1) DVCAM tape - interviews in NYC; 10 seconds of Pentagon footage, but not crash site
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
8 videos were received on 10/11/2001 at Quantico. These videos were collected during consent search of residence in Avanel, New Jersey. Pending case on subject.
* One (1) damaged Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
Videos received on 10/15/2001 at Quantico. These videos were collected from surveillance cameras at multiple Kinko's in South Florida.
* One (1) TDK 1-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
Video received on 10/22/2001 at Quantico. This video was recovered from garbage at residenced in Neenah, Wisconsin by the Neenah Police Department. Investigation on suspect has been closed.
* One (1) damaged VHS video tape and housing
Received at Washington Field Office Command Post
These two video tapes included footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene taken by DOD media pool photographers, and were obtained from Navy Rear Admiral Craig Quigley.
* One (1) Betacam BCT-30G video cassette, labeled "1 of 2" & "early 6pm 9/11/01"
* One (1) Betacam BCT-30G video cassette, labeled "2 of 2" & "early pm 9/11/01"
Also received at the Washington Field Office Command Post:
* One (1) VHS video cassette - witness interviews near Pentagon after the attack
* One (1) VHS video cassette, labeled "9/11/2001" - footage of post Pentagon crime scene, obtained from Chief Mastin, Prince William County
* One (1) TDK Hi8 MP 120 video casette, wrapped in Pentagon map and labeled on back "1/29/1952 Mohan Shresesa 8/2/2018 Todoroki Japan 9/17/01 3:00 hr Fern/So. Rotary" - Home video taken from car, dated 9/17/2001,showing post-crash Pentagon crime scene very briefly from road (~10 seconds)
* One (1) FujiFilm DP121 video cassette, labeled "WJLA-TV" - miscellaneous footage from news reporter, dated 9/18/2001
* One (1) Sony MP120 8mm video cassette - Home video, DC sightseeing
* One (1) TDK HG Ultimate TC-30 video cassette - Home video, unknown date, showing brief footage of Pentagon (not crash site)
* One (1) Maxell DVM60SE mini digital video cassette - Home video, dated 9/17/2001, showing brief footage of Pentagon (not crash site)
* One (1) Sony Hi8 video cassette - Home video obtained by DPS on 9/11/2001 showing ~6 seconds of Pentagon footage (not crash site)
* One (1) TDK Hi8 MP 120 video cassette - Home video obtained by DPS on 9/21/2001, showing post-crash Pentagon crime scene
* One (1) JVC MP120 8mm video cassette - Home video obtained by DPS on 9/21/2001, showing brief footage of Pentagon (not crash site)
Videos filmed on 9/26/2001 by FBI Forensic Audio-Visual Analysis Unit (FAVIAU) of post-crash Pentagon crime scene.
* One (1) original SONY 40 min. Digital Betacam video tape
* One (1) original SONY 40 min. Digital Betacam video tape
Videos submitted to FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, under cover of communication dated 2/19/2002, all depicting WTC footage.
* One (1) Betacam video tape
* One (1) HDCAM video tape
* One (1) Betacam SP video tape
* One (1) Betacam SP video tape
* One (1) Mini DV video tape maked in part Antonio M.
* One (1) DVC PRO video tape
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1056 COPY 5A of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1056 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1471 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1788 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1729 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1808 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1813 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B530 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B729 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1563 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1051 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1787 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B2406 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1276 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "CNN RE: BURN VICTIM..."
* One VHS video tape marked in part "NIGHTLINE 2/15/2002"
Videos submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico, under communication dated 5/13/2002.
* One (1) Sony SDX1-25C video tape
* One (1) Sony SDX1-25C video tape
* One (1) TDK 8mm video tape
Video obtained by FBI on 9/28/2001 and submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico on 5/28/2002. Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 showing footage of WTC after attacks, obtained by Suffolk County, New York Police Department.
* One Hi 8mm video cassette tape from Eileen McMahon
Video obtained by FBI on 9/13/2001 and submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico on 5/28/2002. Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 showing footage of second plane hitting WTC and aftermath.
* One Mini DV 60 video cassette tape
Video submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico under cover of communication dated 9/22/2001. Obtained by FBI NK from Dime Savings Bank, Nutley, New Jersey
* One TDK T-160 VHS video tape
Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 by NBC4 Washington reporter, with footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene shortly after attack. Provided to FBI on 9/12/2001.
* One (1) home Video of the terrorist attack on the Pentagon.
Video from DEA HQ security camera atop 700 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA. Camera repositioned after attack to show post-crash footage of Pentagon. Provided to FBI on 9/12/2001.
* One (1) videotape
Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 by tourist traveling past Pentagon and then by AP photographer who borrowed the camera. Footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene shortly after attack. Provided to FBI on 9/12/2001.
* One (1) videotape
Copy of home video filmed on 9/11/2001 by AP photographer using camera borrowed from nearby motorist. Footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene shortly after attack. Provided to FBI on 9/12/2001.
* One (1) duplicate video cassette tape dated 9/11/01
Video from cameras at Reagan National Airport parking garage. Both video files show smoke in the distance coming from direction of Pentagon. Obtained by FBI on 9/13/2001.
* One (1) CD containing 2 video files
Video from security camera at Citgo Gas Station, 801 S. Joyce Street, Arlington, Virginia. Submitted to FAVIAU to determine if video showed impact of plane into Pentagon. Determined not to show impact. Obtained by FBI on 9/11/2001.
* One (1) JVC EHG Hi-Fi videocassette, labeled Day 11 Quarters K
Video from security camera at Doubletree Hotel, 300 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, Virginia. Security video showing rotating footage from different camera locations at hotel; no camera captures impact of plane into Pentagon.
* One (1) TDK video tape marked "11C"
Images captured by two separate cameras at the entrance to the Pentagon Mall Terrace parkinng lot. Images capture the impact of the plane into the Pentagon from two different cameras. Obtained from the Pentagon Force Protection Agency via USA/EDVA.
* One (1) CD-ROM
Question is.....How come we were only shown maybe two videos if I'm not mistaken and those videos did not show a plane? Don't you think that if a plane was coming that several hundred cameras would have captured them? Open your eyes.................Change is coming...........
The videos taken from the Pentagon area after the 9/11 attacks were mentioned in the Maguire declaration, where FBI Special Agent, Jacqueline Maguire responded to a request from Scott Bingham.
In Summary:
* She determined that the FBI had 85 videotaptes that might be relevant. Of those, 56 "of these videotapes did not show either the Pentagon building, the Pentagon crash site, or the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11."
* Of the 29 remaining videotapes, 16 "did not show the Pentagon crash site and did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon."
* Of the 13 remaining tapes which showed the Pentagon crash site, 12 "only showed after the impact of Flight 77."
* The videotape taken from the Citgo gas station did not show the impact.
* No videotapes were located from the Sheraton Hotel, though she located a videotape from the Doubletree Hotel.
A list of all the videotapes is available, which shows many of these videotapes do not have footage of the Pentagon at all. Instead, many have footage of the WTC, some are security video tapes taken from a Kinko's in Florida, etc. Some that show the Pentagon were taken days after the attacks, and some in the evening of 9/11/2001.
The security camera footage taken from around the Pentagon included the Citgo, the Doubletree, and the Pentagon parking lot. There was also video from cameras at Reagan National Airport parking garage. Both video files show smoke in the distance coming from direction of Pentagon. Another video came from a DEA HQ security camera atop 700 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA. The camera was repositioned after attack to show post-crash footage of Pentagon.
Footage taken after the attack included home video filmed by a tourist traveling past Pentagon and then by AP photographer who borrowed the camera, and video taken by a NBC4 Washington reporter.
The list of 85 videos
Five videotapes were recovered from the post-attack Pentagon crime scene and submitted to the FBI Laboratory in Quantico.
13 videos were obtained by the Defense Protective Services (DPS) - Pentagon Police - on 9/25/2001 from individual filming Pentagon site from Boundary Channel Drive. These included footage from the WTC site in the days after the attcks.
* One (1) Beta video tape - interviews in NYC
* One (1) DVCAM tape labeled "Twin Towers, World Trade Center" - NYC/WTC
* One (1) DVCAM tape - suburban setting, unknown individuals, dated 9/12-13
* One (1) DVCAM tape - NYC/WTC, 9/21-22
* One (1) DVCAM tape - NYC/WTC, 9/22-23
* One (1) DVCAM tape - NYC 9/23
* One (1) DVCAM tape - interviews in NYC; 10 seconds of Pentagon footage, but not crash site
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
* One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
8 videos were received on 10/11/2001 at Quantico. These videos were collected during consent search of residence in Avanel, New Jersey. Pending case on subject.
* One (1) damaged Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
* One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
Videos received on 10/15/2001 at Quantico. These videos were collected from surveillance cameras at multiple Kinko's in South Florida.
* One (1) TDK 1-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
* One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
Video received on 10/22/2001 at Quantico. This video was recovered from garbage at residenced in Neenah, Wisconsin by the Neenah Police Department. Investigation on suspect has been closed.
* One (1) damaged VHS video tape and housing
Received at Washington Field Office Command Post
These two video tapes included footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene taken by DOD media pool photographers, and were obtained from Navy Rear Admiral Craig Quigley.
* One (1) Betacam BCT-30G video cassette, labeled "1 of 2" & "early 6pm 9/11/01"
* One (1) Betacam BCT-30G video cassette, labeled "2 of 2" & "early pm 9/11/01"
Also received at the Washington Field Office Command Post:
* One (1) VHS video cassette - witness interviews near Pentagon after the attack
* One (1) VHS video cassette, labeled "9/11/2001" - footage of post Pentagon crime scene, obtained from Chief Mastin, Prince William County
* One (1) TDK Hi8 MP 120 video casette, wrapped in Pentagon map and labeled on back "1/29/1952 Mohan Shresesa 8/2/2018 Todoroki Japan 9/17/01 3:00 hr Fern/So. Rotary" - Home video taken from car, dated 9/17/2001,showing post-crash Pentagon crime scene very briefly from road (~10 seconds)
* One (1) FujiFilm DP121 video cassette, labeled "WJLA-TV" - miscellaneous footage from news reporter, dated 9/18/2001
* One (1) Sony MP120 8mm video cassette - Home video, DC sightseeing
* One (1) TDK HG Ultimate TC-30 video cassette - Home video, unknown date, showing brief footage of Pentagon (not crash site)
* One (1) Maxell DVM60SE mini digital video cassette - Home video, dated 9/17/2001, showing brief footage of Pentagon (not crash site)
* One (1) Sony Hi8 video cassette - Home video obtained by DPS on 9/11/2001 showing ~6 seconds of Pentagon footage (not crash site)
* One (1) TDK Hi8 MP 120 video cassette - Home video obtained by DPS on 9/21/2001, showing post-crash Pentagon crime scene
* One (1) JVC MP120 8mm video cassette - Home video obtained by DPS on 9/21/2001, showing brief footage of Pentagon (not crash site)
Videos filmed on 9/26/2001 by FBI Forensic Audio-Visual Analysis Unit (FAVIAU) of post-crash Pentagon crime scene.
* One (1) original SONY 40 min. Digital Betacam video tape
* One (1) original SONY 40 min. Digital Betacam video tape
Videos submitted to FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, under cover of communication dated 2/19/2002, all depicting WTC footage.
* One (1) Betacam video tape
* One (1) HDCAM video tape
* One (1) Betacam SP video tape
* One (1) Betacam SP video tape
* One (1) Mini DV video tape maked in part Antonio M.
* One (1) DVC PRO video tape
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1056 COPY 5A of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1056 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1471 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1788 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1729 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1808 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1813 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B530 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B729 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1563 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1051 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1787 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B2406 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1276 COPY 5 of 5"
* One VHS video tape marked in part "CNN RE: BURN VICTIM..."
* One VHS video tape marked in part "NIGHTLINE 2/15/2002"
Videos submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico, under communication dated 5/13/2002.
* One (1) Sony SDX1-25C video tape
* One (1) Sony SDX1-25C video tape
* One (1) TDK 8mm video tape
Video obtained by FBI on 9/28/2001 and submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico on 5/28/2002. Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 showing footage of WTC after attacks, obtained by Suffolk County, New York Police Department.
* One Hi 8mm video cassette tape from Eileen McMahon
Video obtained by FBI on 9/13/2001 and submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico on 5/28/2002. Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 showing footage of second plane hitting WTC and aftermath.
* One Mini DV 60 video cassette tape
Video submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico under cover of communication dated 9/22/2001. Obtained by FBI NK from Dime Savings Bank, Nutley, New Jersey
* One TDK T-160 VHS video tape
Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 by NBC4 Washington reporter, with footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene shortly after attack. Provided to FBI on 9/12/2001.
* One (1) home Video of the terrorist attack on the Pentagon.
Video from DEA HQ security camera atop 700 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA. Camera repositioned after attack to show post-crash footage of Pentagon. Provided to FBI on 9/12/2001.
* One (1) videotape
Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 by tourist traveling past Pentagon and then by AP photographer who borrowed the camera. Footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene shortly after attack. Provided to FBI on 9/12/2001.
* One (1) videotape
Copy of home video filmed on 9/11/2001 by AP photographer using camera borrowed from nearby motorist. Footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene shortly after attack. Provided to FBI on 9/12/2001.
* One (1) duplicate video cassette tape dated 9/11/01
Video from cameras at Reagan National Airport parking garage. Both video files show smoke in the distance coming from direction of Pentagon. Obtained by FBI on 9/13/2001.
* One (1) CD containing 2 video files
Video from security camera at Citgo Gas Station, 801 S. Joyce Street, Arlington, Virginia. Submitted to FAVIAU to determine if video showed impact of plane into Pentagon. Determined not to show impact. Obtained by FBI on 9/11/2001.
* One (1) JVC EHG Hi-Fi videocassette, labeled Day 11 Quarters K
Video from security camera at Doubletree Hotel, 300 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, Virginia. Security video showing rotating footage from different camera locations at hotel; no camera captures impact of plane into Pentagon.
* One (1) TDK video tape marked "11C"
Images captured by two separate cameras at the entrance to the Pentagon Mall Terrace parkinng lot. Images capture the impact of the plane into the Pentagon from two different cameras. Obtained from the Pentagon Force Protection Agency via USA/EDVA.
* One (1) CD-ROM
Question is.....How come we were only shown maybe two videos if I'm not mistaken and those videos did not show a plane? Don't you think that if a plane was coming that several hundred cameras would have captured them? Open your eyes.................Change is coming...........
Monday, November 10, 2008
Welcome to Monday
How to lower population? I call this the disappearing male.
The Disappearing Male is about one of the most important, and least publicized, issues facing the human species: the toxic threat to the male reproductive system.
The last few decades have seen steady and dramatic increases in the incidence of boys and young men suffering from genital deformities, low sperm count, sperm abnormalities and testicular cancer.
At the same time, boys are now far more at risk of suffering from ADHD, autism, Tourette’s syndrome, cerebral palsy, and dyslexia.
The Disappearing Male takes a close and disturbing look at what many doctors and researchers now suspect are responsible for many of these problems: a class of common chemicals that are ubiquitous in our world.
Found in everything from shampoo, sunglasses, meat and dairy products, carpet, cosmetics and baby bottles, they are called “hormone mimicking” or “endocrine disrupting” chemicals and they may be starting to damage the most basic building blocks of human development.
I read this article and I quote this from Dr. Herbert Needleman who said “We are conducting a vast toxicological experiment in which our children and our children’s children are the experimental subjects.”
It's scary to think that they would do this but trust me it is happening.
Update: Notice what is said at the end of this video
The Disappearing Male is about one of the most important, and least publicized, issues facing the human species: the toxic threat to the male reproductive system.
The last few decades have seen steady and dramatic increases in the incidence of boys and young men suffering from genital deformities, low sperm count, sperm abnormalities and testicular cancer.
At the same time, boys are now far more at risk of suffering from ADHD, autism, Tourette’s syndrome, cerebral palsy, and dyslexia.
The Disappearing Male takes a close and disturbing look at what many doctors and researchers now suspect are responsible for many of these problems: a class of common chemicals that are ubiquitous in our world.
Found in everything from shampoo, sunglasses, meat and dairy products, carpet, cosmetics and baby bottles, they are called “hormone mimicking” or “endocrine disrupting” chemicals and they may be starting to damage the most basic building blocks of human development.
I read this article and I quote this from Dr. Herbert Needleman who said “We are conducting a vast toxicological experiment in which our children and our children’s children are the experimental subjects.”
It's scary to think that they would do this but trust me it is happening.
Update: Notice what is said at the end of this video
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Leave New York On 9/11
I know I posted many things over the years about 9/11 but I don't ever recall talking much about those who knew in advance what was about to take place.
According to a report by Jeremy R. Hammond of the Foreign Policy Journal, senior executives of a major U.S. corporation were warned by a former CIA operative to leave New York on September 11, 2001, the latest smoking gun to add to a bulging stack of examples concerning specific prior knowledge of the attacks.
The article cites an anonymous source who worked under a managing director as number two at a European branch of the media giant Warner Bros. The source’s boss was close friends with a senior executive who worked at the head office in L.A. and had also formerly worked for the CIA.
During the memorial arrangements for a senior director from a foreign office who had died, the L.A. executive rejected September 11th as a date for the service because “something big is happening that day” and the top executives from the New York office would all be traveling out of the city.
When asked further about this big event, the executive replied that it was a confidential matter and disclosed no further details, except to say that it was “not corporate”.
The source told the Journal, “I had no reason to think that the ‘event’ could be anything more than perhaps a junket, an out of town think tank exercise or whatever – I remember that these possibilities ran through my mind.”
But after 9/11, thinking back upon the conversation, he grew more curious and tried to ascertain where the board members had been that day. They had indeed been out of New York, he says, traveling not to one location, but each to their own destination. Destinations included overseas locations such as Paris, London, and Amsterdam.
Foreign Policy Journal has not been able to verify the location of individuals on 9/11 or other aspects of the story concerning any potential warning received or given by any Time Warner executives, but did confirm the source’s position at the foreign branch office, the name and position of that office’s managing director, and the name and position of the senior executive from the Los Angeles office.
The corporate media has given limited coverage to reports of general prior knowledge about 9/11, while almost universally ignoring specific examples of foreknowledge.
Perhaps the most blatant example of specific prior knowledge is the fact that, as Newsweek reported in its September 13th 2001 issue, top brass Pentagon officials were warned the night before the attacks and cancelled a trip scheduled for the next day.
Warnings about a big event happening in New York were widespread in the weeks and days before the attacks.
In a story entitled Some Got Warning: Don’t Go Downtown on Sept. 11, the New York Daily News reported, “Some Middle Easterners in the New York area were warned ahead of time to stay out of lower Manhattan the morning of Sept. 11,” noting that federal investigators received tips about overheard conversations in which people were “boasting about or warning about coming attacks.”
Another case involved a Palestinian boy at the New Utrecht High School in Brooklyn. On September 6th, 2001, the boy looked out of his classroom window towards lower Manhattan and said, “Do you see those two buildings?” while pointing at the WTC twin towers. “They won’t be standing there next week.”
This was not an “urban legend” as some have claimed, it has been proven in triplicate by numerous mainstream media reports and acknowledged by federal authorities and the FBI.
This was just one example amongst several reports of schoolchildren in the New York area circulating knowledge of the attacks before they happened. If school kids knew that a major attack was about to take place, how on earth could the most sophisticated intelligence apparatus in the world have failed to pick up on it?
German police confirmed that an Iranian man frantically tried to warn U.S. authorities of an attack on the eve of 9/11, attempting to call them from his deportation cell.
Another proven example of specific prior knowledge that the establishment has attempted to sideline as an “urban myth” is the story concerning the Israeli instant messaging company, Odigo.
A report by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, which was later confirmed by the Washington Post, related how employees of Odigo were warned specifically about the attack via instant messages two hours in advance.
Mayor of San Francisco Willie Brown was set to fly into New York on the morning of September 11. However, he got a call from what he described as his ‘airport security’ late September 10th advising against flying due to a security threat. Brown awoke on September 11th to scenes of the WTC on fire and his flight was cancelled.
A record number of ‘put’ options, speculation that the stock of a company will fall, were placed on American and United Airlines in the days preceding September 11th. This despite a September 10th Reuters report stating ‘airline stocks set to fly.’
Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United
Airlines, but only 396 call options. On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls.
The investigation as to which criminals benefited from advance knowledge of the terrorist attack led straight to Alex Brown/Deutsche Bank - chaired up until 1997 by executive director of the CIA, Buzzy Krongard.
Everyone in America feels OJ killed his wife, why? Because of all the evidence against him. Well, isn't it clear by now all of the evidence presented over years concerning 9/11 deserves a real investigation?
I'll tell you this and when it happens you will not say Oh he was just crazy. When a Bio-Attacks happen here and one that will be worse than the spanish flu, one that will wipe out 80 percent of population remember what I posted here today.
It's also interesting to note that compared to what I believe in meaning God. I see it playing out right before my eyes. I'll give you an example. We believe that after Armageddon, the wicked will be wiped off the planet with only the great crowd remaining on earth to rebuild the earth. Great crowd which is found in the Book of Revelation and it says that no man was able to number this crowd which could also mean that after this virus is released those in charge will not know how many people will survive. I didn't connect the two but understand this, there has always been a connection with what's going on and the bible as if what's going on is the exact blue print of what is printed in the bible. The scriptures tell us that the road to life is cramped and narrow and few are the ones finding it. Wide is that road leading off into destruction.
It popped into my head today talking about vaccinations with a friend. He had a theory that maybe they are giving vaccinations to protect the coming epidemic that will take place. I reasoned that if 80 percent or more were to be wiped out of the planet, it wouldn't make sense since the majority of folks in the United States alone get vaccinated. It's all theory but it makes the most sense. Kill people without having to destroy property and since Vaccinations weaken not help the immune system it would be perfect to release a deadly agent. How would they do this? Look in your skies.
Even a member of Congress mentioned Chemtrail but is this the way that we are removed. Hard to say but if I were to kill of millions of people this is how I would do it.....
According to a report by Jeremy R. Hammond of the Foreign Policy Journal, senior executives of a major U.S. corporation were warned by a former CIA operative to leave New York on September 11, 2001, the latest smoking gun to add to a bulging stack of examples concerning specific prior knowledge of the attacks.
The article cites an anonymous source who worked under a managing director as number two at a European branch of the media giant Warner Bros. The source’s boss was close friends with a senior executive who worked at the head office in L.A. and had also formerly worked for the CIA.
During the memorial arrangements for a senior director from a foreign office who had died, the L.A. executive rejected September 11th as a date for the service because “something big is happening that day” and the top executives from the New York office would all be traveling out of the city.
When asked further about this big event, the executive replied that it was a confidential matter and disclosed no further details, except to say that it was “not corporate”.
The source told the Journal, “I had no reason to think that the ‘event’ could be anything more than perhaps a junket, an out of town think tank exercise or whatever – I remember that these possibilities ran through my mind.”
But after 9/11, thinking back upon the conversation, he grew more curious and tried to ascertain where the board members had been that day. They had indeed been out of New York, he says, traveling not to one location, but each to their own destination. Destinations included overseas locations such as Paris, London, and Amsterdam.
Foreign Policy Journal has not been able to verify the location of individuals on 9/11 or other aspects of the story concerning any potential warning received or given by any Time Warner executives, but did confirm the source’s position at the foreign branch office, the name and position of that office’s managing director, and the name and position of the senior executive from the Los Angeles office.
The corporate media has given limited coverage to reports of general prior knowledge about 9/11, while almost universally ignoring specific examples of foreknowledge.
Perhaps the most blatant example of specific prior knowledge is the fact that, as Newsweek reported in its September 13th 2001 issue, top brass Pentagon officials were warned the night before the attacks and cancelled a trip scheduled for the next day.
Warnings about a big event happening in New York were widespread in the weeks and days before the attacks.
In a story entitled Some Got Warning: Don’t Go Downtown on Sept. 11, the New York Daily News reported, “Some Middle Easterners in the New York area were warned ahead of time to stay out of lower Manhattan the morning of Sept. 11,” noting that federal investigators received tips about overheard conversations in which people were “boasting about or warning about coming attacks.”
Another case involved a Palestinian boy at the New Utrecht High School in Brooklyn. On September 6th, 2001, the boy looked out of his classroom window towards lower Manhattan and said, “Do you see those two buildings?” while pointing at the WTC twin towers. “They won’t be standing there next week.”
This was not an “urban legend” as some have claimed, it has been proven in triplicate by numerous mainstream media reports and acknowledged by federal authorities and the FBI.
This was just one example amongst several reports of schoolchildren in the New York area circulating knowledge of the attacks before they happened. If school kids knew that a major attack was about to take place, how on earth could the most sophisticated intelligence apparatus in the world have failed to pick up on it?
German police confirmed that an Iranian man frantically tried to warn U.S. authorities of an attack on the eve of 9/11, attempting to call them from his deportation cell.
Another proven example of specific prior knowledge that the establishment has attempted to sideline as an “urban myth” is the story concerning the Israeli instant messaging company, Odigo.
A report by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, which was later confirmed by the Washington Post, related how employees of Odigo were warned specifically about the attack via instant messages two hours in advance.
Mayor of San Francisco Willie Brown was set to fly into New York on the morning of September 11. However, he got a call from what he described as his ‘airport security’ late September 10th advising against flying due to a security threat. Brown awoke on September 11th to scenes of the WTC on fire and his flight was cancelled.
A record number of ‘put’ options, speculation that the stock of a company will fall, were placed on American and United Airlines in the days preceding September 11th. This despite a September 10th Reuters report stating ‘airline stocks set to fly.’
Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United
Airlines, but only 396 call options. On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls.
The investigation as to which criminals benefited from advance knowledge of the terrorist attack led straight to Alex Brown/Deutsche Bank - chaired up until 1997 by executive director of the CIA, Buzzy Krongard.
Everyone in America feels OJ killed his wife, why? Because of all the evidence against him. Well, isn't it clear by now all of the evidence presented over years concerning 9/11 deserves a real investigation?
I'll tell you this and when it happens you will not say Oh he was just crazy. When a Bio-Attacks happen here and one that will be worse than the spanish flu, one that will wipe out 80 percent of population remember what I posted here today.
It's also interesting to note that compared to what I believe in meaning God. I see it playing out right before my eyes. I'll give you an example. We believe that after Armageddon, the wicked will be wiped off the planet with only the great crowd remaining on earth to rebuild the earth. Great crowd which is found in the Book of Revelation and it says that no man was able to number this crowd which could also mean that after this virus is released those in charge will not know how many people will survive. I didn't connect the two but understand this, there has always been a connection with what's going on and the bible as if what's going on is the exact blue print of what is printed in the bible. The scriptures tell us that the road to life is cramped and narrow and few are the ones finding it. Wide is that road leading off into destruction.
It popped into my head today talking about vaccinations with a friend. He had a theory that maybe they are giving vaccinations to protect the coming epidemic that will take place. I reasoned that if 80 percent or more were to be wiped out of the planet, it wouldn't make sense since the majority of folks in the United States alone get vaccinated. It's all theory but it makes the most sense. Kill people without having to destroy property and since Vaccinations weaken not help the immune system it would be perfect to release a deadly agent. How would they do this? Look in your skies.
Even a member of Congress mentioned Chemtrail but is this the way that we are removed. Hard to say but if I were to kill of millions of people this is how I would do it.....
I feel sick should I get a shot?
As mentioned I will discuss at length vaccinations. Our Government expect us to go on blind faith and take these shots without any long term study. The rise of Autism and other health effects that seem to be coming from vaccinations is hard to imagine.
Let’s look at what was found in the common vaccinations:
Ethylene Glycol: Ethylene Glycol is nothing more than the technical name for anti-freeze, the same stuff that you put inside your car engine. I don’t think I have to tell you what would happen if you ingest antifreeze.
Thimerosal: This is a mercury derived disinfectant and preservative which is used in a majority of the vaccinations and can result in brain injury over a long period of time leading into Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s Disease, lack of memory, sluggish brain performance and also is known to induce auto-immune diseases such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, ALS as well as altering and depleting the immune system from working efficiently. Young ones have this removed from their flu shots but who knows if its in any other shots
Phenol: Phenol is most commonly used as a disinfectant, also used as a dye, is listened as a carcinogenic agent (cancer-causing) agent and is also known as carbolic acid.
Neomycin and Streptomycin: These compounds are used as antibiotics which have side effects to include severe allergic reactions in some people. It always puzzled me why they are putting two different forms of antibiotics in a viral vaccine.
Aluminum: Aluminum accumulates in the skin, bones, brain and kidneys and can cause Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Aluminum has also caused cancer in laboratory mice. It is commonly used as an additive in most vaccinations.
Formaldehyde: Formaldehyde is used as a preservative. It is also classified as a carcinogenic (cancer-causing agent) and causes the body fluids to become acidic in nature. Formaldehyde will start to preserve your tissues within the body.
I hope that when your doctor starts telling you that it is time for your annual flu vaccine you will present this material to him and ask him how all of these ingredients are going to prevent you from getting the flu. I’ll be very interested in knowing what his answer is to that question. As a side note just to let you know what is being injected to your body, these vaccines are strained through animal or human tissues like chicken embryos, monkey kidney tissue and embryonic guinea pig cells, to name a few.
While you may sit here and tell me why I should get my kids vaccinated, I'll ask why are these cancer causing agents thrown into these so-called vaccinations. Just ask yourself a question. Why is it that cancer is now every one and two now instead of every one and 10 back then and if you go even further back, it was one in 150 etc.. As time moves on we have to figure what is causing all of this. Sure we can look at what we eat, what we drink, the cars we drive, etc..But what study are they doing today to figure out what is causing all of it? Yes they are trying to find a cure or are they? I don't know but wouldn't it make sense if you looked at what was causing it in the first place and then remove that, that you would slowly start to see the numbers change in our favor? Problem is there is so many things that can cause cancer and if you remove them from our products I'm sure the economy would go from bad to worse. Well, I don't know how bad it will get. I'm sure it's going to get worse.
Do they test on humans? They sure do. They have in the past and they are testing now as I'm typing this. One that comes to mind is The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment that lasted forty years between 1932 and 1972. By the end of the experiment, 28 of the men had died directly of syphilis, 100 were dead of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected, and 19 of their children had been born with congenital syphilis. How had these men been induced to endure a fatal disease in the name of science? To ensure that the men would show up for a painful and potentially dangerous spinal tap, the PHS doctors misled them with a letter full of promotional hype: “Last Chance for Special Free Treatment.” The fact that autopsies would eventually be required was also concealed.
In 1990, a survey found that 10 percent of African Americans believed that the U.S. government created AIDS as a plot to exterminate blacks, and another 20 percent could not rule out the possibility that this might be true. As preposterous and paranoid as this may sound, at one time the Tuskegee experiment must have seemed equally far-fetched.
Who could imagine the government, all the way up to the Surgeon General of the United States, deliberately allowing a group of its citizens to die from a terrible disease for the sake of an ill-conceived experiment? In light of this and many other shameful episodes in our history, African Americans' widespread mistrust of the government and society in general should not be a surprise to anyone.
Should it shock anyone if I say that Aids was created to Target those in Africa and the Gay community? You think that all of it just pops up somehow? Common sense folks. No virus just happens. If you believe the government that AIDS is hard to catch then you are going to die even sooner than the rest of us. The common cold is a virus. Have you ever had a cold? How did you catch it? Where did it start? You don't really know, do you? If the cold virus were fatal how many people would there be left in the world?
Yellow fever is a virus. You catch it from mosquito bites. Malaria is a parasite also carried by mosquitoes. It is many times larger than the AIDS virus (like comparing a pinhead to a moose head) yet the mosquito easily carries this large organism to man. The tuberculosis germ, also, much larger than the AIDS virus, can be transmitted by fomites (inanimate objects such as towels). The AIDS virus can live for as long as 10 days on a dry plate. You can't understand this murder mystery unless you learn a little virology.
Many viruses grow in animals and many grow in humans, but most of the viruses that affect animals don't affect humans. There are exceptions, of course, such as yellow fever and small pox. There are some viruses in animals that cause very lethal cancer in those animals, but do not affect man or other animals. The bovine leukemia virus (BLV), for example, is lethal to cows but not humans. There is another virus that occurs in sheep called sheep visna virus which is also non-reactive in man. These deadly viruses are "retro viruses" meaning that they can change the genetic composition of cells that they enter. Think about this
The World Health Organization, in published articles, called for scientists to work with these deadly agents and attempt to make a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans: "And attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus."
That's AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is "Let's cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency."
Why would anyone want to do this? If you destroy the T-cell system of man you destroy man. Is it even remotely possible that the World Health Organization would want to develop a virus that would wipe out the human race?
If their new virus creation worked, the WHO stated, then many terrible and fatal infectious viruses could be made even more terrible and more malignant. Does this strike you as being a peculiar goal for a health organization?
Sometimes Americans believe in conspiracies and sometimes they don't. Was there a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy? Twenty-five years later the debate still continues, and people keep changing their minds. One day it's yes, the next day it's no-depending on what was served for breakfast or how the stock market did the day before.
But it doesn't take a bad breakfast to see an amazing concatenation of events involving Russian and Chinese communist nationals, the World Health Organization, the National Cancer Institute and the AIDS pandemic.
But what about the green monkey? Some of the best virologist in the world and many of those directly involved in AIDS research, such as Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier, have said that the green monkey may be the culprit. You know the story: A green monkey bit a native on the behind and, bam-AIDS all over central Africa.
There is a fatal flaw here. It is very strange. Because Gallo, Montagnier and these other virologists know that the AIDS virus doesn't occur naturally in monkeys. In fact it doesn't occur naturally in any animal.
AIDS started practically simultaneously in the United States, Haiti, Brazil, and Central Africa. (Was the green monkey a jet pilot?) Examination of the gene structure of the green monkey cells proves that it is not genetically possible to transfer the AIDS virus from monkeys to man by natural means. Because of the artificial nature of the AIDS virus it will not easily transfer from man to man until it has become very concentrated in the body fluids through repeated injections from person to person, such as drug addicts, and through high multiple partner sexual activity such as that which takes place in Africa and among homosexuals. After repeated transfer it can become an "natural" infection for man, which it has.
Also - The AIDS virus didn't exist in the United States before 1978. You can check back in any hospital and no stored blood samples can be found anywhere that exhibit the AIDS virus before that date. What happened in 1978 and beyond to cause AIDS to burst upon the scene and devastate the homosexual segment of our population? It was the introduction of the hepatitis B vaccine which exhibits the exact epidemiology of AIDS.
The Centers for Disease Control reported in 1981 that four percent of those receiving the hepatitis-vaccine were AIDS-infected. In 1984 they admitted to 60 percent. Now they refuse to give out figures at all because they don't want to admit that 100 percent of hepatitis vaccine receivers are infected with AIDS.
Where is the data on the hepatitis vaccine studies? FDA? CDC? No, the U.S Department of Justice has it buried where you will never see it. What has the government told us about AIDS?
* It's a homosexual disease-WRONG. (The homosexuals certainly spread it but the primary responsibility wasn't theirs.)
* It's related to anal intercourse only-WRONG.
* Only a small percentage of those testing positive for AIDS would get the disease-WRONG.
* It came from the African green-back monkey-WRONG.
* It came from the cytomegalovirus-WRONG.
* It was due to popping amyl nitrate with sex-WRONG.
* It was started 400 years ago by the Portuguese-WRONG.
* You can't get it from insects-WRONG.
* The virus can't live outside the body-WRONG.
You want me or should I say expect me to trust vaccinations? Or trust that their test will not harm me? As mentioned in the beginning, next time you go to your doctor ask them what shot they are giving you and what's inside, how is it made, how is it tested, how is it stored. Like I said you get more information on your food than you do a vaccine.
Sorry for the wall of text, it's just how I explain things. Till tomorrow....
Man is not meant to direct his own step. Tomorrow I will discuss population....
Let’s look at what was found in the common vaccinations:
Ethylene Glycol: Ethylene Glycol is nothing more than the technical name for anti-freeze, the same stuff that you put inside your car engine. I don’t think I have to tell you what would happen if you ingest antifreeze.
Thimerosal: This is a mercury derived disinfectant and preservative which is used in a majority of the vaccinations and can result in brain injury over a long period of time leading into Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s Disease, lack of memory, sluggish brain performance and also is known to induce auto-immune diseases such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, ALS as well as altering and depleting the immune system from working efficiently. Young ones have this removed from their flu shots but who knows if its in any other shots
Phenol: Phenol is most commonly used as a disinfectant, also used as a dye, is listened as a carcinogenic agent (cancer-causing) agent and is also known as carbolic acid.
Neomycin and Streptomycin: These compounds are used as antibiotics which have side effects to include severe allergic reactions in some people. It always puzzled me why they are putting two different forms of antibiotics in a viral vaccine.
Aluminum: Aluminum accumulates in the skin, bones, brain and kidneys and can cause Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Aluminum has also caused cancer in laboratory mice. It is commonly used as an additive in most vaccinations.
Formaldehyde: Formaldehyde is used as a preservative. It is also classified as a carcinogenic (cancer-causing agent) and causes the body fluids to become acidic in nature. Formaldehyde will start to preserve your tissues within the body.
I hope that when your doctor starts telling you that it is time for your annual flu vaccine you will present this material to him and ask him how all of these ingredients are going to prevent you from getting the flu. I’ll be very interested in knowing what his answer is to that question. As a side note just to let you know what is being injected to your body, these vaccines are strained through animal or human tissues like chicken embryos, monkey kidney tissue and embryonic guinea pig cells, to name a few.
While you may sit here and tell me why I should get my kids vaccinated, I'll ask why are these cancer causing agents thrown into these so-called vaccinations. Just ask yourself a question. Why is it that cancer is now every one and two now instead of every one and 10 back then and if you go even further back, it was one in 150 etc.. As time moves on we have to figure what is causing all of this. Sure we can look at what we eat, what we drink, the cars we drive, etc..But what study are they doing today to figure out what is causing all of it? Yes they are trying to find a cure or are they? I don't know but wouldn't it make sense if you looked at what was causing it in the first place and then remove that, that you would slowly start to see the numbers change in our favor? Problem is there is so many things that can cause cancer and if you remove them from our products I'm sure the economy would go from bad to worse. Well, I don't know how bad it will get. I'm sure it's going to get worse.
Do they test on humans? They sure do. They have in the past and they are testing now as I'm typing this. One that comes to mind is The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment that lasted forty years between 1932 and 1972. By the end of the experiment, 28 of the men had died directly of syphilis, 100 were dead of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected, and 19 of their children had been born with congenital syphilis. How had these men been induced to endure a fatal disease in the name of science? To ensure that the men would show up for a painful and potentially dangerous spinal tap, the PHS doctors misled them with a letter full of promotional hype: “Last Chance for Special Free Treatment.” The fact that autopsies would eventually be required was also concealed.
In 1990, a survey found that 10 percent of African Americans believed that the U.S. government created AIDS as a plot to exterminate blacks, and another 20 percent could not rule out the possibility that this might be true. As preposterous and paranoid as this may sound, at one time the Tuskegee experiment must have seemed equally far-fetched.
Who could imagine the government, all the way up to the Surgeon General of the United States, deliberately allowing a group of its citizens to die from a terrible disease for the sake of an ill-conceived experiment? In light of this and many other shameful episodes in our history, African Americans' widespread mistrust of the government and society in general should not be a surprise to anyone.
Should it shock anyone if I say that Aids was created to Target those in Africa and the Gay community? You think that all of it just pops up somehow? Common sense folks. No virus just happens. If you believe the government that AIDS is hard to catch then you are going to die even sooner than the rest of us. The common cold is a virus. Have you ever had a cold? How did you catch it? Where did it start? You don't really know, do you? If the cold virus were fatal how many people would there be left in the world?
Yellow fever is a virus. You catch it from mosquito bites. Malaria is a parasite also carried by mosquitoes. It is many times larger than the AIDS virus (like comparing a pinhead to a moose head) yet the mosquito easily carries this large organism to man. The tuberculosis germ, also, much larger than the AIDS virus, can be transmitted by fomites (inanimate objects such as towels). The AIDS virus can live for as long as 10 days on a dry plate. You can't understand this murder mystery unless you learn a little virology.
Many viruses grow in animals and many grow in humans, but most of the viruses that affect animals don't affect humans. There are exceptions, of course, such as yellow fever and small pox. There are some viruses in animals that cause very lethal cancer in those animals, but do not affect man or other animals. The bovine leukemia virus (BLV), for example, is lethal to cows but not humans. There is another virus that occurs in sheep called sheep visna virus which is also non-reactive in man. These deadly viruses are "retro viruses" meaning that they can change the genetic composition of cells that they enter. Think about this
The World Health Organization, in published articles, called for scientists to work with these deadly agents and attempt to make a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans: "And attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus."
That's AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is "Let's cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency."
Why would anyone want to do this? If you destroy the T-cell system of man you destroy man. Is it even remotely possible that the World Health Organization would want to develop a virus that would wipe out the human race?
If their new virus creation worked, the WHO stated, then many terrible and fatal infectious viruses could be made even more terrible and more malignant. Does this strike you as being a peculiar goal for a health organization?
Sometimes Americans believe in conspiracies and sometimes they don't. Was there a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy? Twenty-five years later the debate still continues, and people keep changing their minds. One day it's yes, the next day it's no-depending on what was served for breakfast or how the stock market did the day before.
But it doesn't take a bad breakfast to see an amazing concatenation of events involving Russian and Chinese communist nationals, the World Health Organization, the National Cancer Institute and the AIDS pandemic.
But what about the green monkey? Some of the best virologist in the world and many of those directly involved in AIDS research, such as Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier, have said that the green monkey may be the culprit. You know the story: A green monkey bit a native on the behind and, bam-AIDS all over central Africa.
There is a fatal flaw here. It is very strange. Because Gallo, Montagnier and these other virologists know that the AIDS virus doesn't occur naturally in monkeys. In fact it doesn't occur naturally in any animal.
AIDS started practically simultaneously in the United States, Haiti, Brazil, and Central Africa. (Was the green monkey a jet pilot?) Examination of the gene structure of the green monkey cells proves that it is not genetically possible to transfer the AIDS virus from monkeys to man by natural means. Because of the artificial nature of the AIDS virus it will not easily transfer from man to man until it has become very concentrated in the body fluids through repeated injections from person to person, such as drug addicts, and through high multiple partner sexual activity such as that which takes place in Africa and among homosexuals. After repeated transfer it can become an "natural" infection for man, which it has.
Also - The AIDS virus didn't exist in the United States before 1978. You can check back in any hospital and no stored blood samples can be found anywhere that exhibit the AIDS virus before that date. What happened in 1978 and beyond to cause AIDS to burst upon the scene and devastate the homosexual segment of our population? It was the introduction of the hepatitis B vaccine which exhibits the exact epidemiology of AIDS.
The Centers for Disease Control reported in 1981 that four percent of those receiving the hepatitis-vaccine were AIDS-infected. In 1984 they admitted to 60 percent. Now they refuse to give out figures at all because they don't want to admit that 100 percent of hepatitis vaccine receivers are infected with AIDS.
Where is the data on the hepatitis vaccine studies? FDA? CDC? No, the U.S Department of Justice has it buried where you will never see it. What has the government told us about AIDS?
* It's a homosexual disease-WRONG. (The homosexuals certainly spread it but the primary responsibility wasn't theirs.)
* It's related to anal intercourse only-WRONG.
* Only a small percentage of those testing positive for AIDS would get the disease-WRONG.
* It came from the African green-back monkey-WRONG.
* It came from the cytomegalovirus-WRONG.
* It was due to popping amyl nitrate with sex-WRONG.
* It was started 400 years ago by the Portuguese-WRONG.
* You can't get it from insects-WRONG.
* The virus can't live outside the body-WRONG.
You want me or should I say expect me to trust vaccinations? Or trust that their test will not harm me? As mentioned in the beginning, next time you go to your doctor ask them what shot they are giving you and what's inside, how is it made, how is it tested, how is it stored. Like I said you get more information on your food than you do a vaccine.
Sorry for the wall of text, it's just how I explain things. Till tomorrow....
Man is not meant to direct his own step. Tomorrow I will discuss population....
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Life is amazing
I discussed Vaccinations with one of my brothers yesterday who didn't know why I felt the way that I do. I asked him the question to see if he had any idea on why I did not vaccinate my kids. I understand that parents will vaccinate their kids and I understand their worry if an when and outbreak happens.
Some or should I say many parents think something is wrong with us if we don't vaccinate our children. Well, let me ask you this. When you go food shopping, do you look at the label of what it contains? You get to decide if you are going to purchase it or not based on if it's healthy for you or not. You are told all that's in it so you can make that decision.
I want to know what's in these shots that they are saying that's good for me so I can make a decision. I want to know why there isn't or hasn't been a study on what the long term effects of these shots can have on people. For example, did you know that Detergent is in the flu shot? If you didn't then you need to stay informed. I work in the field of common sense. I use that logic in life. They say there is no connection to Autism and vaccinations. Well let's see. My kid was fine till he or she received these shots. Ok so if it's not the shots then what else was my child doing that could have caused this reaction? Could it be the baby food that he or she was eating? I doubt it. Most cases that I've read mentioned clearly that it only happened after receiving vaccinations so as a parent wouldn't you like to know what's in these shots before you put them in your children?
I do and will post information on it. Stay informed.
Some or should I say many parents think something is wrong with us if we don't vaccinate our children. Well, let me ask you this. When you go food shopping, do you look at the label of what it contains? You get to decide if you are going to purchase it or not based on if it's healthy for you or not. You are told all that's in it so you can make that decision.
I want to know what's in these shots that they are saying that's good for me so I can make a decision. I want to know why there isn't or hasn't been a study on what the long term effects of these shots can have on people. For example, did you know that Detergent is in the flu shot? If you didn't then you need to stay informed. I work in the field of common sense. I use that logic in life. They say there is no connection to Autism and vaccinations. Well let's see. My kid was fine till he or she received these shots. Ok so if it's not the shots then what else was my child doing that could have caused this reaction? Could it be the baby food that he or she was eating? I doubt it. Most cases that I've read mentioned clearly that it only happened after receiving vaccinations so as a parent wouldn't you like to know what's in these shots before you put them in your children?
I do and will post information on it. Stay informed.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Who was Job?
The book of Job draws back the veil of invisibility, and we are provided a view of a meeting of angels that took place before Jehovah God in heaven. There Jehovah reminds Satan, who is also present, that there is “no one like [Job] in the earth, a man blameless and upright, fearing God and turning aside from bad.” Clearly, an issue exists that involves Job’s integrity. But it is not a new one. The issue was implied when Satan turned Adam and Eve away from God and, in effect, said: ‘Just give me the chance, and I can turn anybody away from serving you.
But who was Job? Job was an outstanding man in history. Not only did he possess great material wealth but he was respected as a compassionate judge and leader. The Bible says that he “came to be the greatest of all the Orientals.” He is noted, along with Noah and Daniel, as a very righteous man. The Bible also features Job as an example for Christians to follow, thus showing that he was an actual person in history.
Job lived in the land of Uz, in what is now Arabia. Although not an Israelite, Job was a worshiper of Jehovah, something that Jehovah drew to Satan’s attention. God’s statement that “there is no one like him in the earth, a man blameless and upright,” reveals that there was no other outstanding servant of God living at that time. Thus, Job’s testing by Satan must have occurred while his distant cousins, the Israelites, were in slavery in Egypt—sometime during the years following the death of the outstanding integrity keeper Joseph in 1657 B.C.E. and before Moses entered upon his course of integrity.
Moses evidently wrote the book of Job. But how could he have learned about Job’s testing? Well, after Moses was forced to leave Egypt in 1553 B.C.E. he settled in Midian, not far from the land of Uz. At that time, Job was living out the final 140 years of life with which Jehovah blessed him. Later, when the Israelites were near Uz toward the end of their wilderness journey, Moses could have heard about the last years of Job’s life and his death.
When Job was tested, his knowledge of God and his purposes was limited, since no part of the Bible had yet been recorded. However, Job would have known something about Jehovah’s dealings with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph. This is because Job was evidently a descendant of Abraham’s brother Nahor, through Nahor’s firstborn son Uz. Furthermore, the brother of Uz was Bethuel, the father of Isaac’s wife Rebekah and the great-grandfather of Joseph. Job no doubt came to treasure whatever knowledge he had of Jehovah’s communications with Abraham and his descendants, and he was anxious to please Jehovah. Thus Job became a man of outstanding integrity, a man blameless and completely devoted to Jehovah.
Not long after Joseph’s death in Egypt, Job’s integrity became a subject of controversy between Jehovah God and Satan in the invisible heavens. Yet Job had no knowledge of this controversy that centered around his integrity. And it is, in particular, his ignorance regarding why he was suffering that makes his unbreakable integrity so remarkable. For the benefit of all God’s servants afterward, however, Jehovah had Moses record the details of the controversy regarding Job’s integrity.
So what happened to Job?
Again Satan challenged Job’s integrity saying that he can turn anyone away from serving God. Jehovah accepts Satan’s challenge. He trusts Job’s integrity completely, answering Satan: “Look! Everything that he has is in your hand. Only against him himself do not thrust out your hand!” Satan strikes quickly against Job. Raiding Sabeans take off with Job’s 1,000 oxen and 500 donkies, killing all their attendants except one. Next, Satan sends a fire from heaven to consume Job’s 7,000 sheep along with their attendants, sparing only one of the men. Then Satan causes three bands of Chaldeans to take off with Job’s 3,000 camels, killing all but one of the attendants. Finally, Satan sends a great wind that strikes the house where Job’s ten children are feasting, and they all die. Afterward, in quick succession, the survivors of these disasters report the terrible news to Job
What calamities! Even if Job understood who had caused them, they would be difficult to bear. But he did not. He did not know that he was the center of a controversy in heaven and that Jehovah was using him to demonstrate that there are people who will hold to their integrity despite all the unjust suffering that Satan may bring upon them. Yet, stricken with grief and even thinking that somehow God was responsible for his losses, Job said: “Jehovah himself has given, and Jehovah himself has taken away. Let the name of Jehovah continue to be blessed.” Yes, “in all this Job did not sin or ascribe anything improper to God.”
How humiliating for Satan, at another meeting of angels, to be reminded by Jehovah regarding Job: “Even yet he is holding fast his integrity”! But Satan does not give up. He now challenges that if he is given the opportunity to strike Job physically, Job will curse God to his face. Trusting in Job’s integrity even to this extent, Jehovah gives permission, only warning Satan not to take Job’s life. So Satan ‘strikes Job with a malignant boil from the sole of his foot to the crown of his head. Job is reduced to such a disgustingly miserable state that his relatives and friends shy away, and former acquaintances mock him.
Then yet another blow! The faith of Job’s wife weakens. She says to him: “Are you yet holding fast your integrity? Curse God and die!” But he tells her: “As one of the senseless women speaks, you speak also. Shall we accept merely what is good from the true God and not accept also what is bad?” As the account says, “In all this Job did not sin with his lips.” And when you remember that the reason for his suffering has been concealed from Job, how truly remarkable his integrity is!
Truly, Job was a remarkable man of integrity! He had no way of knowing that he was being made the target of Satan’s wicked challenge. This emphasizes his integrity all the more because even though he believed that all his suffering was from God, still he would not deny God or curse him. What a lesson for us, since we do know the source of the tests of our integrity! Surely, we should be moved to imitate Job’s example and go forward in Jehovah’s work regardless of anything God’s Adversary can bring against us.
We will be tested by those in the world, by those who are friends, and by those who are family. Question is when the test comes no matter what it is, how will you do? Will you keep your integrity to God? Will you allow things in this world to stop you? I recall as mentioned a few blogs ago that I was afraid on how I was going to be looked at. That all changed when I put my complete trust in God. I felt he was with me all the way and yes till this very day I’m tested. Use Job as an example of not allowing anything or anyone to come between you and God….Peace….
But who was Job? Job was an outstanding man in history. Not only did he possess great material wealth but he was respected as a compassionate judge and leader. The Bible says that he “came to be the greatest of all the Orientals.” He is noted, along with Noah and Daniel, as a very righteous man. The Bible also features Job as an example for Christians to follow, thus showing that he was an actual person in history.
Job lived in the land of Uz, in what is now Arabia. Although not an Israelite, Job was a worshiper of Jehovah, something that Jehovah drew to Satan’s attention. God’s statement that “there is no one like him in the earth, a man blameless and upright,” reveals that there was no other outstanding servant of God living at that time. Thus, Job’s testing by Satan must have occurred while his distant cousins, the Israelites, were in slavery in Egypt—sometime during the years following the death of the outstanding integrity keeper Joseph in 1657 B.C.E. and before Moses entered upon his course of integrity.
Moses evidently wrote the book of Job. But how could he have learned about Job’s testing? Well, after Moses was forced to leave Egypt in 1553 B.C.E. he settled in Midian, not far from the land of Uz. At that time, Job was living out the final 140 years of life with which Jehovah blessed him. Later, when the Israelites were near Uz toward the end of their wilderness journey, Moses could have heard about the last years of Job’s life and his death.
When Job was tested, his knowledge of God and his purposes was limited, since no part of the Bible had yet been recorded. However, Job would have known something about Jehovah’s dealings with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph. This is because Job was evidently a descendant of Abraham’s brother Nahor, through Nahor’s firstborn son Uz. Furthermore, the brother of Uz was Bethuel, the father of Isaac’s wife Rebekah and the great-grandfather of Joseph. Job no doubt came to treasure whatever knowledge he had of Jehovah’s communications with Abraham and his descendants, and he was anxious to please Jehovah. Thus Job became a man of outstanding integrity, a man blameless and completely devoted to Jehovah.
Not long after Joseph’s death in Egypt, Job’s integrity became a subject of controversy between Jehovah God and Satan in the invisible heavens. Yet Job had no knowledge of this controversy that centered around his integrity. And it is, in particular, his ignorance regarding why he was suffering that makes his unbreakable integrity so remarkable. For the benefit of all God’s servants afterward, however, Jehovah had Moses record the details of the controversy regarding Job’s integrity.
So what happened to Job?
Again Satan challenged Job’s integrity saying that he can turn anyone away from serving God. Jehovah accepts Satan’s challenge. He trusts Job’s integrity completely, answering Satan: “Look! Everything that he has is in your hand. Only against him himself do not thrust out your hand!” Satan strikes quickly against Job. Raiding Sabeans take off with Job’s 1,000 oxen and 500 donkies, killing all their attendants except one. Next, Satan sends a fire from heaven to consume Job’s 7,000 sheep along with their attendants, sparing only one of the men. Then Satan causes three bands of Chaldeans to take off with Job’s 3,000 camels, killing all but one of the attendants. Finally, Satan sends a great wind that strikes the house where Job’s ten children are feasting, and they all die. Afterward, in quick succession, the survivors of these disasters report the terrible news to Job
What calamities! Even if Job understood who had caused them, they would be difficult to bear. But he did not. He did not know that he was the center of a controversy in heaven and that Jehovah was using him to demonstrate that there are people who will hold to their integrity despite all the unjust suffering that Satan may bring upon them. Yet, stricken with grief and even thinking that somehow God was responsible for his losses, Job said: “Jehovah himself has given, and Jehovah himself has taken away. Let the name of Jehovah continue to be blessed.” Yes, “in all this Job did not sin or ascribe anything improper to God.”
How humiliating for Satan, at another meeting of angels, to be reminded by Jehovah regarding Job: “Even yet he is holding fast his integrity”! But Satan does not give up. He now challenges that if he is given the opportunity to strike Job physically, Job will curse God to his face. Trusting in Job’s integrity even to this extent, Jehovah gives permission, only warning Satan not to take Job’s life. So Satan ‘strikes Job with a malignant boil from the sole of his foot to the crown of his head. Job is reduced to such a disgustingly miserable state that his relatives and friends shy away, and former acquaintances mock him.
Then yet another blow! The faith of Job’s wife weakens. She says to him: “Are you yet holding fast your integrity? Curse God and die!” But he tells her: “As one of the senseless women speaks, you speak also. Shall we accept merely what is good from the true God and not accept also what is bad?” As the account says, “In all this Job did not sin with his lips.” And when you remember that the reason for his suffering has been concealed from Job, how truly remarkable his integrity is!
Truly, Job was a remarkable man of integrity! He had no way of knowing that he was being made the target of Satan’s wicked challenge. This emphasizes his integrity all the more because even though he believed that all his suffering was from God, still he would not deny God or curse him. What a lesson for us, since we do know the source of the tests of our integrity! Surely, we should be moved to imitate Job’s example and go forward in Jehovah’s work regardless of anything God’s Adversary can bring against us.
We will be tested by those in the world, by those who are friends, and by those who are family. Question is when the test comes no matter what it is, how will you do? Will you keep your integrity to God? Will you allow things in this world to stop you? I recall as mentioned a few blogs ago that I was afraid on how I was going to be looked at. That all changed when I put my complete trust in God. I felt he was with me all the way and yes till this very day I’m tested. Use Job as an example of not allowing anything or anyone to come between you and God….Peace….
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)